Skip to main content Accesibility Help

Consequences of the Now-or-Never bottleneck for signed versus spoken languages

  • Karen Emmorey (a1)

Signed and spoken languages emerge, change, are acquired, and are processed under distinct perceptual, motor, and memory constraints. Therefore, the Now-or-Never bottleneck has different ramifications for these languages, which are highlighted in this commentary. The extent to which typological differences in linguistic structure can be traced to processing differences provides unique evidence for the claim that structure is processing.

Hide All
Aronoff, M., Meir, I. & Sandler, W. (2005) The paradox of sign language morphology. Language 81(2):301–44.
Bellugi, U., Klima, E. S. & Siple, P. (1975) Remembering in signs. Cognition 3:93–25.
Brentari, D. (1998) A prosodic model of sign language phonology. The MIT Press.
Cowan, N. (2000) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:87185.
Cutler, A., Hawkins, J. A. & Gilligan, G. (1985) The suffixing preference: A processing explanation. Linguistics 23:723–58.
Emmorey, K. (1995) Processing the dynamic visual-spatial morphology of signed languages. In: Morphological aspects of language processing: Cross-linguistic perspectives, ed. Feldman, L. M., pp. 2954. Erlbaum.
Emmorey, K., Bosworth, R. & Kraljic, T. (2009) Visual feedback and self-monitoring of sign language. Journal of Memory and Language 61:398–11.
Hall, M. & Bavelier, D. (2009) Short-term memory stages in sign versus speech: The source of the serial span discrepancy. Cognition 120:5466.
Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., Cutler, A. & Butterfield, S. (1997) The possible word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 34:191–43.
Orfanidou, E., Morgan, G., Adam, R. & McQueen, J. (2010) Recognition of signed and spoken language: Different sensory inputs, the same segmentation procedure. Journal of Memory and Language 62:272–83.
Sandler, W. (1986) The spreading hand autosegment of American Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 50:128.
Sandler, W., Aronoff, M., Meir, I. & Padden, C. (2011) The gradual emergence of phonological form in a new language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29:503–43.
Supalla, S. (1991) Manually coded English: The modality question in signed language development. In: Theoretical issues in sign language research, ed. Siple, P. & Fischer, S. D., pp. 85109. University of Chicago Press.
Supalla, S. & McKee, C. (2002) The role of manually coded English in language development of deaf children. In: Modality and structure in signed and spoken languages, ed. Meier, R. P., Cormier, K. & Quinto-Pozos, D., pp. 143–65. Cambridge University Press.
Wilson, M. & Emmorey, K. (1997) A visual-spatial “phonological loop” in working memory: Evidence from American Sign Language. Memory and Cognition 25(3):313–20.
Wilson, M. & Emmorey, K. (1998) A “word length effect” for sign language: Further evidence on the role of language in structuring working memory. Memory and Cognition 26(3):584–90.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed