Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Musolino, Julien Chunyo, Gitana and Landau, Barbara 2010. Uncovering Knowledge of Core Syntactic and Semantic Principles in Individuals With Williams Syndrome. Language Learning and Development, Vol. 6, Issue. 2, p. 126.


    Karmiloff-Smith, Annette Brown, Janice Grice, Sarah and Paterson, Sarah 2003. Dethroning the Myth: Cognitive Dissociations and Innate Modularity in Williams Syndrome. Developmental Neuropsychology, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 227.


    Karmiloff-Smith, Annette 1998. Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 2, Issue. 10, p. 389.


    ×

Constructivism, nativism, and explanatory adequacy

  • Derek Bickerton (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X97231584
  • Published online: 01 December 1997
Abstract

Constructivism is the most recent in a long line of failed attempts to discredit nativism. It seeks support from true (but irrelevant) facts, wastes its energy on straw men, and jumps logical gaps; but its greatest weakness lies in its failure to match nativism's explanation of a wide range of disparate phenomena, particularly in language acquisition.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×