Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:36:12.569Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defending explanatory coherence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Paul Thagard
Paul Thagard
Affiliation:
Cognitive Science Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08542, Electronic mail: pault@clarity.princeton.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Author's Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 745 - 748
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, R. J. (1986) Reconceptualizing civil trials. Boston University Law Review 66:401–37. [CRC]Google Scholar
Brilmayer, L. (1986) Second-order evidence and Bayesian logic. Boston University Law Review 66:673–91. [CRC]Google Scholar
Cohen, L. J. (1986) The role of evidential weight in criminal proof. Boston University Law Review 66:635–49. [CRC]Google Scholar
Collins, H., (1985) Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. Sage Press. [LR]Google Scholar
Dietrich, E. (1989) Is Thagard's theory of explanatory coherence the new logical positivism? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(3):473. [SMD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, J. A. & Ballard, D. H. (1982) Connectionist models and their properties. Cognitive Science 6:205–54. [NC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giere, R. N. (1989) What does explanatory coherence explain? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(3):475. [SMD, LR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorman, M. E. (1989) Artificial epistemology? Social Studies of Science 19:374–80. [LR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guerlac, H. (1981) Lavoisier. In: Dictionary of scientific biography. Scribner. [SMD]Google Scholar
Harman, G. (1986) Change in view: Principles of reasoning. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [CRC]Google Scholar
Hinton, G. E. & Sejnowski, T. J. (1986) Learning and relearning in Boltzmann machines. In: Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructures of cognition, vol. 1: Foundations, ed. Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L.. MIT Press. [NC]Google Scholar
Hobbs, J. R. (1989) Are explanatory coherence and connectionist models necessary? Commentary on Thagard, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:476–77. [NC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, F. L. (1985) Lavoisier and the chemistry of life. University of Wisconsin Press. [LR]Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. & Thagard, P. (1989) Analogical mapping by constraint satisfaction. Cognitive Science 13:295–355. [PT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopfield, J. J. (1982) Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational properties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 79:2554–58. [NC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, D. H. (1986) Do we need a calculus of weight to understand proof beyond a reasonable doubt? Boston University Law Review 66:657–72. [CRC]Google Scholar
Lavoisier, A.-L. (1862/1777) Oeuvres de Lavoisier, tome II 1862. Originally published 1777. [LR]Google Scholar
Lempert, R. (1986) The new evidence scholarship: Analyzing the process of proof. Boston University Law Review 66:439–77. [CRC]Google Scholar
McDermott, D. (1989) Optimization and connectionism are two different things. Commentary on Thagard, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:483–84. [NC, PT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, G. & Thagard, P. (in press a). Copernicus, Ptolemy, and explanatory coherence. In: Cognitive models of science, Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science, vol. 15, ed. Giere, R.. University of Minnesota Press. [PT]Google Scholar
(in press b) Newton, Descartes, and explanatory coherence. In: Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice, ed. Duschl, R. & Hamilton, R.. SUNY Press. [PT]Google Scholar
O'Rorke, P. (1989) Coherence and abduction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(3):484. [CRC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paulus, P. B., ed. (1989) Psychology of group influence. Erlbaum. [SMD]Google Scholar
Pearl, J. (1988) Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems. Morgan Kaufman. [PT]Google Scholar
Perrin, C. E. (1989) Document, text and myth: Lavoisier's crucial year revisited. British Journal of the History of Science 22:3–25. [SMD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinch, T. (1985) Toward an analysis of scientific observation: The externality and evidential context of observational reports in physics. Social Studies of Science 15:3–36. [LR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, L. (1991a) Setting the table. In: The structure of scientific arguments, ed. Dear, Peter. University of Pennsylvania Press. [LR] (1991b) A word and the world: The significance of naming the calorimeter. his (June). [LR]Google Scholar
Schank, P. & Ranney, M. (1991) The psychological fidelity of ECHO. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum. [PT]Google Scholar
Sintonen, M. (1989) Theory autonomy and future promise. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(3):488. [CRC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolensky, P. (1986) Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundations of harmony theory. In: Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructures of cognition, vol. 1: Foundations, ed. Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L.. MIT Press. [NC]Google Scholar
Thagard, P. (1988) Computational philosophy of science. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [CRC, PT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989t) Explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:435–502. [CRC, NC, SMD, LR, PT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1989r) Extending explanatory coherence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:490–99. [PT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990) The conceptual structure of the chemical revolution. Philosophy of Science 57:183–209. [LR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(in press a) Conceptual revolutions. Princeton University Press. [PT]Google Scholar
(in press b) The dinosaur debate: Explanatory coherence and the problem of competing hypotheses. In: Philosophy and AI: Essays at the interface, ed. Pollock, J. & Cummins, R.. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [PT]Google Scholar
(submitted) Probabilistic networks and explanatory coherence. Submitted to a volume on abductive inference. [PT]Google Scholar
(forthcoming) Adversarial problem solving: Modeling an opponent using explanatory coherence. Unpublished manuscript, Princeton University. [PT]Google Scholar
Thagard, P. & Nowak, G. (1990) The conceptual structure of the geological revolution. In: Computational models of discovery and theory formation, ed. Shrager, J. & Langley, P.. Morgan Kaufman. [PT]Google Scholar
Thagard, P., Holyoak, K., Nelson, G. & Gochfeld, D. (1990) Analog retrieval by constraint satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence 46:259–310. [PT]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wetherick, N. E. (1989) Psychology, or sociology of science? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(3):489. [SMD]CrossRefGoogle Scholar