Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology

  • John R. Hibbing (a1), Kevin B. Smith (a2) and John R. Alford (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

Disputes between those holding differing political views are ubiquitous and deep-seated, and they often follow common, recognizable lines. The supporters of tradition and stability, sometimes referred to as conservatives, do battle with the supporters of innovation and reform, sometimes referred to as liberals. Understanding the correlates of those distinct political orientations is probably a prerequisite for managing political disputes, which are a source of social conflict that can lead to frustration and even bloodshed. A rapidly growing body of empirical evidence documents a multitude of ways in which liberals and conservatives differ from each other in purviews of life with little direct connection to politics, from tastes in art to desire for closure and from disgust sensitivity to the tendency to pursue new information, but the central theme of the differences is a matter of debate. In this article, we argue that one organizing element of the many differences between liberals and conservatives is the nature of their physiological and psychological responses to features of the environment that are negative. Compared with liberals, conservatives tend to register greater physiological responses to such stimuli and also to devote more psychological resources to them. Operating from this point of departure, we suggest approaches for refining understanding of the broad relationship between political views and response to the negative. We conclude with a discussion of normative implications, stressing that identifying differences across ideological groups is not tantamount to declaring one ideology superior to another.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Differences in negativity bias underlie variations in political ideology
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
AckermanJ. M., NoceraC. C. & BarghJ. A. (2010) Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science 328(5986):1712–15.
AdornoT. W., Frenkel-BrunswikE., LevinsonD. J. & SanfordR. N. (1950) The authoritarian personality. Harper.
AlfordJ. R., FunkC. L. & HibbingJ. R. (2005) Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review 99(2):153–67.
AltemeyerB. (1981) Right-wing authoritarianism. University of Manitoba Press.
AltemeyerB. (1996) The authoritarian specter. Harvard University Press.
AlwinD. F. & KrosnickJ. A. (1991) Aging, cohorts, and the stability of sociopolitical orientations over the life span. American Journal of Sociology 97:169–95.
AmodioD. M., JostJ. T., MasterS. L. & YeeC. M. (2007) Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience 10(10):1246–47. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn1979.
ApicellaC. L. & CesariniD. A. (2011) Testosterone response and political donations: Winner loser effects in the 2008 presidential election. In: Man is by nature a political animal: Evolution, biology and politics, ed. Hatemi P. K. & McDermott R., pp. 261–72. University of Chicago Press.
AronE. N. (1996) The highly sensitive person. Broadway Books.
AtranS. (2012) God and the ivory tower. Foreign Policy Available at: http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2012/08/06/god_and_the_ivory_tower?page=full, 08-08-2012.
BaumeisterR. F., BratslavskyE., FinkenauerC. & VohsK. D. (2001) Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology 5(4):323–70.
BellD. (1960) The end of ideology: On the exhaustion of political ideas in the fifties. Harvard University Press.
BellE., SchermerJ. A. & VernonP. A. (2009) The origins of political attitudes and behaviours: An analysis using twins. Canadian Journal of Political Science 42(4):855–79.
BenjaminD. L., CesariniD., MatthijsJ. H. M., DawesC. T., KoellingerP. D., MagunssonP. K. E., ChabrisC. F., ConleyD., LaibsonD., JohannessonM. & VisscherP. M. (2012) The genetic architecture of economic and political preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 109(21):8026–31. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120666109.
BergerJ., MeredithM. & WheelerS. C. (2008) Contextual priming: Where people vote affects how they vote. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 105(26):8846–49.
BlockJ. & BlockJ. H. (2006) Nursery school personality and political orientation two decades later. Journal of Research in Personality 40:734–49.
BobbioN. (1996) Left & right: The significance of a political distinction. University of Chicago Press.
BonannoG. A. & JostJ. T. (2006) Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 28(4):311–23.
BouchardT. J.Jr. (2009) Authoritarianism, religiousness and conservatism: Is “obedience to authority” the explanation for their clustering, universality and evolution? In: The biological evolution of religious mind and behaviour, ed. Voland E. & Schiefenhövel W., pp. 165–80. Springer.
BouchardT. J. & McGueM. (2003) Genetic and environmental influences on human psychological differences. Journal of Neurobiology 54(1):445.
BraderT. (2006) Campaigning for hearts and minds: How emotional appeals in political ads work. University of Chicago Press.
BussD. M. & GreilingH. (1999) Adaptive individual differences. Journal of Personality 67(2):209–43.
CacioppoJ. T., PettyR. E., FeinsteinJ. A. & JarvisW. B. G. (1996) Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation. Psychological Bulletin 119:197253.
CacioppoJ. T. & VisserP. S. (2003) Political psychology and social neuroscience: Strange bedfellows or comrades in arms? Political Psychology 24(4):647–56.
CapraraG. V., BarbaranelliC. & ZimbardoP. G. (1999) Personality profiles and political parties. Political Psychology 20(1):175–97.
CarminesE. G. & StimsonJ. A. (1990) Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton University Press.
CarraroL., CastelliL. & MacchiellaC. (2011) The automatic conservative: Ideology-based attentional asymmetries in the processing of valenced information. PLoS ONE 6(11):e26456. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0026456.
CarsayT. & LaymanG. (2002) Party polarization and “conflict extension” in the American electorate. American Journal of Political Science 46(4):786802.
CastanoE., LeidnerB., BonacossaA., NikkahJ., PerrullR., SpencerB. & HumphreyN. (2011) Ideology, fear of death, and death anxiety. Political Psychology 32:601–21.
CastelliL. & CarraroL. (2011) Ideology is related to basic cognitive processes involved in attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47:1013–16.
CharneyE. (2008) Politics, genetics, and ‘greedy reductionism.’ Perspectives on Politics 6(2):299320.
CharneyE. & EnglishW. (2012) Candidate genes and political behavior. American Political Science Review 106(1):134.
ChirumboloA., AreniA. & SensalesG. (2004) Need for cognitive closure and politics: Voting, political attitudes, and attributional style. International Journal of Psychology 39(4):245–53.
CochranG. & HarpendingH. (2009) The 10,000 year explosion. Basic Books.
CohenS. & HamrickN. (2003) Stable individual differences in physiological response to stressors: Implications for stress-elicited changes in immune related health. Brain, Behavior & Immunity 17(6):407–14.
ConverseP. E. (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: Ideology and discontent, ed. Apter D. E., pp. 206–61. Free Press of Glencoe.
CulottaE. (2012) Roots of racism. Science 336:825–27.
DambrumM., DespresG. & GuimondS. (2003) On the multifaceted nature of prejudice: Psychophysiological responses to ingroup and outgroup ethnic stimuli. Current Research in Social Psychology 8:187206.
DawsonM. E., SchellA. M. & FilionD. L. (2007) The electrodermal system. In: Handbook of psychophysiology, ed. Cacioppo J. T., Tassinary L. G. & Berntson G. G.. Cambridge University Press.
De DreuC. K. W., GreerL. L., Van KleefG. A., SalviS. & HandgraafM. J. J. (2011) Oxytocin promotes human ethnocentrism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108:1262–66.
DeppeK. D., StoltenbergS. F., SmithK. B. & HibbingJ. R. (2013) Candidate genes and voter turnout: Further evidence on the role of 5-HTTLPR. American Political Science Review 107(2):375–81.
De WeerthC. & Van GeertP. (2002) A longitudinal study of basal cortisol in infants. Infant Behavior and Development 25(4): 375–98.
DoddM. D., BalzerA., JacobsC. M., GruszczynskiM. W., SmithK. B. & HibbingJ. R. (2012) The political left rolls with the good; the political right confronts the bad. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Biological Sciences 367(1589):640–49.
Echebarria-EchabeA. & Fernandez-GuedeE. (2006) Effects of terrorism on attitudes and ideological orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology 36(2):259–65.
EmersonR. W. (1903) The complete works of Ralph Waldo Emerson. Houghton Mifflin.
FedericoC., GolecA. & DialJ. (2005) The relationship between need for closure and support for military action against Iraq: Moderating effects of national attachment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31:621–32.
FeldmanS. (2003) Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. In: Oxford handbook of political psychology, ed. Sears D. O., Huddy L. & Jervis J., pp. 477508. Oxford University Press.
FeldmanS. & StennerK. (1997) Perceived threat and authoritarianism. Political Psychology 18(4):741–70.
FigueredoA. J., GladdenP., VasquesG., WolfP. S. A. W. & JonesD. N. (2009) Evolutionary theories of personality. In: Cambridge handbook of personality psychology: Part IV, biological perspectives, ed. Corr P. J. & Matthews G., pp. 265–74. Cambridge University Press.
FincherC. L. & ThornhillR. (2012) Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35(2):6179.
FiorinaM. P. (2005) Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. Longman.
FodorE. M., WickD. P., HartsenK. M. & PreveR. M. (2008) Right-wing authoritarianism in relation to proposed judicial action, electromyographic response, and affective attitudes toward a schizophrenic mother. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38(1):215–33.
FowlerJ. H., BakerL. A. & DawesC. T. (2008) Genetic variation in political participation. American Political Science Review 102(2):233–48.
FowlerJ. H. & DawesC. T. (2008) Two genes predict voter turnout. Journal of Politics 70(3):579–94.
FowlerJ. H. & DawesC. T. (2013) In defense of genopolitics. American Political Science Review 107(2):362–74.
FraleyR. C., GriffinB. N., BelskyJ. & RoismanG. I. (2012) Developmental antecedents of political ideology: A longitudinal investigation from birth to age 18 years. Psychological Science 23:1425–31.
FukuyamaF. (1992) The end of history and the last man. Free Press.
GaldiS., ArcuriL. & GawronskiB. (2008) Automatic mental associations predict future choices of undecided decision-makers. Science 321(5892):1100–102.
GerberA. S., GreenD. P. & SchacharR. (2003) Voting may be habit-forming: Evidence from a randomized field experiment. American Journal of Political Science 47(3):540–50.
GerberA. S., HuberG. A., DohertyD., DowlingC. M. & HaS. E. (2010) Personality and political attitudes: Relationships across issue domains and political contexts. American Political Science Review 104(01):111–33.
GervaisW. M. & NorenzayanA. (2012) Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science 336:493–96.
GolecA. (2002) Need for cognitive closure and political conservatism: Studies on the nature of the relationship. Polish Psychological Bulletin 33:512.
GolecA., CislakA. & WesolowskaE. (2010) Political conservatism, need for cognitive closure, and intergroup hostility. Political Psychology 3(44):521–41.
GoslingS. D., RentfrowP. J. & SwannW. B. (2003) A very brief measure of the big-five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality 37(6):504–28.
GrahamJ., HaidtJ. & NosekB. (2009) Liberals and conservatives use different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96:1029–46.
HaidtJ. & GrahamJ. (2007) When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research 20(1):98116.
HaidtJ. & JosephC. (2004) Intuitive ethics: How innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues. Daedalus 133(4):5566.
HaidtJ., McCauleyC. & RozinP. (1994) Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences 16(5):701–13.
HansenC. H. & HansenR. D. (1988) Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54:917–24.
HatemiP. K., AlfordJ. R., HibbingJ. R., MartinN. G. & EavesL. J. (2009) Is there a “party” in your genes? Political Research Quarterly 62(3):584600.
HatemiP. K., GillespieN. A., EavesL. J., MaherB. S., WebbB. T., HeathA. C., MedlandS. E., SmythD. C., BeebyH. N., GordonS. D., MontgomeryG. W., ZhuG., ByrneE. M. & MartinN. G. (2011) A genome-wide analysis of liberal and conservative political attitudes. Journal of Politics 73(1):115.
HatemiP. K., McDermottR., EavesL. J., KendlerK. S. & NealeM. C. (2013) Fear as a disposition and an emotional state. American Journal of Political Science 57:279–93.
HatemiP. K., MedlandS., MorleyK., HeathA. C. & MartinN. G. (2007) The genetics of voting: An Australian twin study. Behavior Genetics 37(3):435–48.
HelzerE. G. & PizarroD. A. (2011) Dirty liberals! Reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science 22(4):517–22.
HenigR. M. (2009) Understanding the anxious mind. The New York Times, October 4. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/04/magazine/04anxiety-t.html.
HetheringtonM. J. & WeilerJ. D. (2009) Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. Cambridge University Press.
HirshJ. B., DeYoungC. G., XuX. & PetersonJ. B. (2010) Compassionate liberals and polite conservatives: Associations of agreeableness with political ideology and moral values. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36(5):655–64.
HuddyL. & FeldmanS. (2011) Americans respond politically to 9/11: Understanding the impact of the terrorist attacks and their aftermath. American Psychologist 66(6):455–67.
HuddyL., FeldmanS. & WeberC. (2007) The political consequences of perceived threat and felt insecurity. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614(1):131–53.
HuizengaN. A. T. M., KoperJ. W., de LangeP., PolsH. A. P., StolkR. P., GrobbeeD. E., de JongF. H. & LambertsS. W. J. (1998) Interperson variability but intraperson stability of baseline plasma cortisol concentrations, and its relation to feedback sensitivity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis to a low dose of dexamethasone in elderly individuals. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 83(1):4754.
InbarY., PizarroD. A. & BloomP. (2009a) Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition and Emotion 23(4):714–25.
InbarY., PizarroD. A. & BloomP. (2012a) Disgusting smells cause decreased liking of gay men. Emotion 12:2337.
InbarY., PizarroD. A., IyerR. & HaidtJ. (2012b) Disgust sensitivity, political conservatism, and voting. Social Psychological and Personality Science 3(5):537–44.
InbarY., PizarroD. A., KnobeJ. & BloomP. (2009b) Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion 9:435–39.
InzlichtM., McGregorI., HirshJ. B. & NashK. (2009) Neural markers of religious conviction. Psychological Science 20(3):385–92.
IyerR., KolevaS., GrahamJ., DittoP. H. & HaidtJ. (2012) Understanding libertarian morality: The psychological roots of an individualist ideology. PLos ONE 7(8):e42366.
JacobyW. G. (2009) Ideology and vote choice in the 2004 election. Electoral Studies 28(4):584–94.
Janoff-BulmanR. (2009) To provide or protect: Motivational bases of political liberalism and conservatism. Psychological Inquiry 20:120–28.
JencksC. (1980) Heredity, environment, and public policy reconsidered. American Sociological Review 45:723–36.
JenningsM. K. & NiemiR. G. (1968) The transmission of political values from parent to child. American Political Science Review 62(1):169–84.
JostJ. T. (2006) The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist 61(7):651–70.
JostJ. T. & AmodioD. M. (2012) Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motivation and Emotion 36:5564.
JostJ. T., FitzsimonsG. & KayA. C. (2004) The ideological animal. In: Handbook of experimental psychology, ed. Greenberg J., Koole S. L. & Pyszczynski T., pp. 263–83. Guilford.
JostJ. T., GlaserJ., KruglanskiA. W. & SullowayF. J. (2003) Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin 129(3):339–75.
JostJ. T., KruglanskiA. W. & SimonL. (1999) Effects of epistemic motivation on conservatism, intolerance, and other system justifying attitudes. In: Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge, ed. Thompson L., Messick D. M. & Levine J. M., pp. 91116. Erlbaum.
JostJ. T., NosekB. A. & GoslingS. D. (2008) Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science 3:126–36.
KahnemanD. & TverskyA. (1984) Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist 39(4):341–50.
KanaiR., FeildenT., FirthC. & ReesG. (2011) Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology 21:677–80.
KemmelmeierM. (1997) Need for closure and political orientation among German university students. Journal of Social Psychology 137(6):787–89.
KlemmensenR., HatemiP. K., HoboltS. B., PetersenI., SkyttheA. & Norgaard.A. S. (2012) The genetics of political participation, civic duty and political efficacy across cultures. Journal of Theoretical Politics 24(3):409–27.
KnutsonK. M., WoodJ. N., SpampinatoM. V. & GrafmanJ. (2006) Politics on the brain: An fMRI investigation. Social Neuroscience 1(1):2540.
KosfeldM., HeinrichsM., ZakP. J., FischbacherU. & FehrE. (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans. Nature 435:673–76.
KossowskaM. & Van HielA. (2003) The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology 24(3):501–18.
KruglanskiA. W., WebtserD. M. & KlemA. (1993) Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65(5):861–76.
LakoffG. (2002) Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think. University of Chicago Press.
LandauM. J., SolomonS. & GreenbergJ. (2004) Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30:1136–50.
LaponceJ.A. (1981) Left and right: The topography of political perceptions. University of Toronto Press.
Lewis-BeckM. S., NadeauR. & EliasA. (2008) Economics, party, and the vote: Causality issues and panel data. American Journal of Political Science 52(1):8495.
LiebermanM. D., SchreiberD. & OchsnerK. N. (2003) Is political thinking like riding a bicycle? How cognitive neuroscience can inform research on political thinking. Political Psychology 24(4):681704.
LieneschM. (1982) Right-wing religion: Christian conservatism as a political movement. Political Science Quarterly 97(3):403–25.
LodgeM. & HamillR. (1986) A partisan schema for political information processing. American Political Science Review 80(2):505–20.
LodgeM. & TaberC. S. (2005) The automaticity of affect for political leaders, groups, and issues: An experimental test of the hot cognition hypothesis. Political Psychology 26(3):455–82.
LodgeM. & TaberC. S. (2013) The rationalizing voter. Cambridge University Press.
LykkenD. (1999) Happiness: What studies of twins show us about nature, nurture, and the happiness set point. Golden Books.
MadsenD. (1985) A biochemical property relating to power seeking in humans. American Political Science Review 79(2):448–57.
MarcusG. W., NewmanR. & MackuenM. (2000) Affective intelligence and political judgment. University of Chicago Press.
MarcusG. W., SullivanJ. L., Theiss-MorseE. & WoodS. (1995) With malice toward some: How people make civil liberties judgments. Cambridge University Press.
MartinN. G., EavesL. J., HeathA. C., JardineR., FeingoldL. M. & EysenckH. J. (1986) Transmission of social attitudes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 15:4364–68.
McCartyN. M., PooleK. T. & RosenthalH. (2006) Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press.
McCloskeyH. (1958) Conservatism and personality. American Political Science Review 52(1):2745.
McCraeR. R. (1996) Social consequences of experiential openness. Psychological Bulletin 120(3):323–37.
McDermottR., JohnsonD., CowdenJ. & RosenS. (2007) Testosterone and aggression in a simulated crisis game. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 614(1):1533.
McDermottR., TingleyD., CowdenJ., FrazzettoG. & JohnsonD. (2009) Monoamine Oxidase A gene (MAOA) predicts behavioral aggression following provocation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(7):2118–23.
McLeanS. P., GarzaJ. P., WiebeS. A., DoddM. D., SmithK. B., HibbingJ. R. & EspyK. A. (in press) Applying the flanker task to political psychology. Political Psychology. DOI: 10.1111/pops.12056.
MerelmanR. M. (1971) The development of policy thinking in adolescence. American Political Science Review 65(4):1033–47.
MillJ. S. (1991) On liberty. In: On liberty and other essays, ed. Gray J., pp. 1128. Oxford University Press.
MondakJ. J. & HalperinK. D. (2008) A framework for the study of personality and political behavior. British Journal of Political Science 38(2):335–62.
MondakJ. J., HibbingM. V., CanacheD., SeligsonM. A. & AndersonM. R. (2010) Personality and civic engagement: An integrative framework for the study of trait effects on political behavior. American Political Science Review 104(1):85110.
NailP. R. & McGregorI. (2009) Conservative shift among liberals and conservatives following 9/11/013. Social Justice Research 22(2–3):231–40.
NeimanJ. L. (2012) Political ideology, personality and the correlations with tastes and preferences for music, art, literature and food. Unpublished manuscript, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 2012.
NettleD. (2006) The evolution of personality variation in humans and other animals. American Psychologist 61(6):622–31.
NiemiR. G. & JenningsM. K. (1991) Issues and inheritance in the formation of party identification. American Journal of Political Science 35(4):970–88.
NorrisC. J., LarsenJ. T., CrawfordL. E. & CacioppoJ. T. (2011) Better (or worse) for some than others: Individual differences in the positivity offset and negativity bias. Journal of Research in Personality 45:100–11.
NosekB. A., GrahamJ. & HawkinsC. B. (2010) Implicit political cognition. In: Handbook of implicit social cognition, ed. Gawronski B. & Payne B. K., pp. 548–64. Guilford.
OxleyD. R., SmithK. B., AlfordJ. R., HibbingM. V., MillerJ. L., ScaloraM., HatemiP. K. & HibbingJ. R. (2008) Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science 321(5896):1667–70.
PetersenM. B. (2009) Public opinion and evolved heuristics: The role of category-based inference. Journal of Cognition and Culture 9(3):367–89.
PinkerS. (2002) The blank slate: The modern denial of human nature. Viking.
PinkerS. (2011) The better angels of our nature. Penguin.
PiurkoY., SchwartzS. & DavidovE. (2011) Basic personal values and the meaning of left-right political orientations in 20 countries. Political Psychology 32(40):537–61.
PlutzerE. (2002) Becoming a habitual voter: Inertia, resources, and growth in young adulthood. American Political Science Review 96(1):4156.
PrattoF., SidaniusJ., StallworthL. M. & MalleB. F. (1994) Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67(4):741–63.
PriorM. (2010) You've either got it or you don't? The stability of political interest over the life cycle. Journal of Politics 72(3):747–66.
PruittJ. N. & RiechertS. E. (2011) How within-group behavioral variation and task efficiency enhance fitness in a social group. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278:1209–15.
RedlawskD. P. (2006) Feeling politics: Emotion in political information processing. Macmillan.
RentfrowP. J., JostJ. T., GoslingS. D. & PotterJ. (2009) Statewide differences in personality predict voting patterns in 1996–2004 U. S. presidential elections. In: Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification, ed. Jost J. T., Kay A. C. & Thorisdottir H., pp. 314–47. Oxford University Press.
RockM. S. & Janoff-BulmanR. (2010) Where do we draw our lines? Politics, rigidity, and the role of self-regulation. Social Psychological and Personality Science 1(1):2633.
RozinR. & RoyzmanE. B. (2001) Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review 4:296320.
RutchickA. M. (2010) Deus ex machina: The influence of polling place on voting behavior. Political Psychology 31(2):209–25.
SargentM. (2004) Less thought, more punishment: Need for cognition predicts support for punitive responses to crime. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30(11):1485–93.
SchallerM. & NeubergS. L. (2008) Intergroup prejudices and intergroup conflicts. In: Foundations of evolutionary psychology, ed. Crawford C. & Krebs D. L., pp. 399412. Erlbaum.
SchreiberD. M., FonzoG., SimmonsA. N., DawesC. T., FlaganT., FowlerJ. H. & PaulusM. P. (2013) Red brain, blue brain: Evaluative processes differ in Democrats and Republicans. PLoS ONE 8:e52970.
SchnallS., HaidtJ., CloreG. L. & JordanA. H. (2008) Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34(8):1096–109.
SchwartzS. (2006) A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology 5(2–3):137–82.
SchwartzS. H. (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In: Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25, ed. Zanna M. P., pp. 165. Academic Press.
SchwartzS. H., CapraraG. V. & VecchioneM. (2010) Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology 31(3):421–52.
SearsD. O. & FunkC. L. (1999) Evidence of the long-term persistence of adults' political predispositions. The Journal of Politics 61(01):128.
SettleJ. E., DawesC. T., ChristakisN. A. & FowlerJ. H. (2010) Friendships moderate an association between a Dopamine gene variant and political ideology. Journal of Politics 72(4):1189–98.
ShookN. J. & FazioR. H. (2009) Political ideology, exploration of novel stimuli, and attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45(4):995–98.
SidaniusJ. & PrattoF. (2001) Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
SmithK. B. & HatemiP. K. (2013) OLS is AOK for ACE: A regression-based approach to synthesizing political science and behavioral genetics models. Political Behavior 35:383408. doi: 10.1007/s11109-012-9192-2.
SmithK. B., OxleyD. R., HibbingM. V., AlfordJ. R. & HibbingJ. R. (2011) Disgust sensitivity and the neurophysiology of left-right political orientations. PloS ONE 6(10):19.
SowellT. (1987) A conflict of visions: Ideological origins of political struggles. Quill.
StantonS. J., BeehnerJ. C., SainiE. K., KuhnC. M. & LabarK. S. (2009) Dominance, politics, and physiology: Voters' testosterone changes on the night of the 2008 United States presidential election. PLoS ONE 4(10):e7543. Available at: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0007543.
StantonS. J., LaBarK. S., SainiE. K., KuhnC. M. & BeehnerJ. C. (2010) Stressful politics: Voters' cortisol responses to the outcome of the 2008 United States presidential election. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35(5):768–74.
StennerK. (2005) The authoritarian dynamic. Cambridge University Press.
SullivanD. G. & MastersD. R. (1988) Happy warriors: Leaders' facial displays, viewers' emotions, and political support. American Journal of Political Science 32(2):345–68.
TetlockP. E. & MitchellG. (1993) Liberal and conservative approaches to justice: Conflicting psychological portraits. In: Psychological perspectives on justice; Theory and Applications, ed. Mellers B. A. & Baron J., pp. 234–55. Cambridge University Press.
ThorisdottirH., JostJ. T., LiviatanI. & ShroutP. E. (2007) Psychological needs and values underlying left-right political orientations: Cross-national evidence from Eastern and Western Europe. Public Opinion Quarterly 71(2):175203.
ThornhillR., FincherC. L. & AranD. (2009) Parasites, democratization, and the liberalization of values across contemporary countries. Biological Reviews 84(1):113–31.
TomkinsS. S. (1963) Left and right: A basic dimension of ideology and personality. In: The study of lives, ed. White R. W., pp. 388411. Atherton.
ToobyJ. & CosmidesL. (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture, ed. Barkow J. H., Cosmides L. & Tooby J., pp. 19136. Oxford University Press.
TyburJ. M., LiebermanD. & GriskeviciusV. (2009) Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97(1):103–22.
TyburJ. M., MerrimanL. A., CaldwellA. E., McDonaldM. W. & NavarreteC. D. (2010) Extending the behavioral immune system to political psychology: Are political conservatism and disgust sensitivity really related? Evolutionary Psychology 8:599616.
ValentinoN. A., HutchingsV. L., BanksA. J. & DavisA. K. (2008) Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology 29(2):247–73.
van HielA., PandelaereM. & DuriezB. (2004) The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: Differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30(7):824–37.
VanmanE. J., SaltzJ., NathanL. & WarrenJ. (2004) Racial discrimination by low-prejudiced whites: Facial movements as implicit measures of attitudes related to behavior. Psychological Science 15:711–14.
VigilJ. M. (2010) Political leanings vary with facial expression processing and psychosocial functioning. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 13:547–58.
WadeN. (2011) Depth of the kindness hormone appears to know some bounds. The New York Times, January 10.
WahlkeJ. C. (1979) Pre-Behavioralism in political science. American Political Science Review 73(1):931.
Waismel-ManorI., IfergaineG. & CohenH. (2011) When endocrinology and democracy collide: Emotions, cortisol and voting at national elections. European Neuropsychopharmacology 21(11):789–95.
WeaverJ. (1992) Two kinds: The genetic origin of conservatives and liberals. Baird.
WeisbergH. F. (1974) Dimensionland: An excursion into spaces. American Journal of Political Science 18(4):743–76.
WestenD., BlagovP. S., HarenskiK., KiltsC. & HamannS. (2006) Neural bases of motivated reasoning: An fMRI study of emotional constraints on partisan political judgment in the 2004 U. S. presidential election. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(11):1947–58.
WheatleyT. & HaidtJ. (2005) Hypnotically induced disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science 16(10):780–84.
WillG. (2003) Conservative psychosis. Townhall.com. Available at: http://townhall.com/columnists/georgewill/2003/08/10/conservative_psychosis/page/full/.
WilsonG. D. (1973) The psychology of conservatism. Academic Press.
WilsonG. D. (1990) Ideology and humor preferences. International Political Science Review 11(4):461–72.
WilsonG. D., AusmanJ. & MatthewsT. R. (1973) Conservatism and art preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 25(2):286–88.
WilsonG. D. & PattersonJ. R. (1968) A new measure of conservatism. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 7(4):264–69.
YoungE. (2009) Why we're liberal, why we're conservative: A cognitive theory on the origins of ideological thinking. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Political Science, Stony Brook University. Available at: http://dspace.sunyconnect.suny.edu/bitstream/handle/1951/52392/000000880.sbu.pdf?sequence=1.
ZajoncR. B. (1980) Social psychology: An experimental approach. Brooks/Cole.
ZallerJ. (1992) The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 880
Total number of PDF views: 2294 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 10687 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.