Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Minds, brains, and programs

  • John R. Searle (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This article can be viewed as an attempt to explore the consequences of two propositions. (1) Intentionality in human beings (and animals) is a product of causal features of the brain. I assume this is an empirical fact about the actual causal relations between mental processes and brains. It says simply that certain brain processes are sufficient for intentionality. (2) Instantiating a computer program is never by itself a sufficient condition of intentionality. The main argument of this paper is directed at establishing this claim. The form of the argument is to show how a human agent could instantiate the program and still not have the relevant intentionality. These two propositions have the following consequences: (3) The explanation of how the brain produces intentionality cannot be that it does it by instantiating a computer program. This is a strict logical consequence of 1 and 2. (4) Any mechanism capable of producing intentionality must have causal powers equal to those of the brain. This is meant to be a trivial consequence of 1. (5) Any attempt literally to create intentionality artificially (strong AI) could not succeed just by designing programs but would have to duplicate the causal powers of the human brain. This follows from 2 and 4.

“Could a machine think?” On the argument advanced here only a machine could think, and only very special kinds of machines, namely brains and machines with internal causal powers equivalent to those of brains. And that is why strong AI has little to tell us about thinking, since it is not about machines but about programs, and no program by itself is sufficient for thinking.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. W. Frey (1977) An introduction to computer chess. In: Chess skill in man and machine, ed. P. W. Frey . New York, Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag. [RP]

W. G. Lycan (forthcoming) Form, function, and feel. Journal of Philosophy. [NB, WGL]

E. Panofsky (1954) Galileo as a critic of the arts. The Hague: Martínus Nijhoff. [JCM]

K. R. Popper & J. C. Eccles (1977) The self and its brain. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. [JCE, GM]

H. Putnam (1975a) The meaning of “meaning.” In: Mind, language and reality. Cambridge University Press. [NB, WGL]

H. Putnam (1975b) The nature of mental states. In: Mind, language and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [NB]

H. Putnam (1975c) Philosophy and our mental life. In: Mind, language and reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [MM]

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score