Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Don't throw the baby out with the math water: Why discounting the developmental foundations of early numeracy is premature and unnecessary

  • Kevin Muldoon (a1), Charlie Lewis (a2) and Norman Freeman (a3)

We see no grounds for insisting that, because the concept natural number is abstract, its foundations must be innate. It is possible to specify domain general learning processes that feed into more abstract concepts of numerical infinity. By neglecting the messiness of children's slow acquisition of arithmetical concepts, Rips et al. present an idealized, unnecessarily insular, view of number development.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

E. Margolis & S. Laurence (2008) How to learn the natural numbers: Inductive inference and the acquisition of number concepts. Cognition 106:924–39.

K. Muldoon , C. Lewis & N. H. Freeman (2003) Putting counting to work: Preschoolers' understanding of cardinal extension. International Journal of Educational Research 39:695718.

K. P. Muldoon , C. Lewis & J. Towse (2005) Because it's there! Why children count, rather than infer, corresponding sets. Cognitive Development 20:472–91.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 14 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 85 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.