Skip to main content

The dynamics of development: Challenges for Bayesian rationality

  • Nils Straubinger (a1), Edward T. Cokely (a1) and Jeffrey R. Stevens (a1)

Oaksford & Chater (O&C) focus on patterns of typical adult reasoning from a probabilistic perspective. We discuss implications of extending the probabilistic approach to lifespan development, considering the role of working memory, strategy use, and expertise. Explaining variations in human reasoning poses a challenge to Bayesian rational analysis, as it requires integrating knowledge about cognitive processes.

Hide All
Anderson, J. R. (1991a) Is human cognition adaptive? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 14:471–84; discussion 485–517.
Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M. & Lindenberger, U. (1999) Lifespan psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology 50:471507.
Brighton, H. & Gigerenzer, G. (2008) Bayesian brains and cognitive mechanisms: Harmony or dissonance? In: The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science, ed. Chater, N. & Oaksford, M., pp. 189208, Oxford University Press.
Cokely, E. T., Kelley, C. M. & Gilchrist, A. L. (2006) Sources of individual differences in working memory: Contributions of strategy to capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 13:991–97.
Conlin, J. A., Gathercole, S. E. & Adams, J. W. (2005) Children's working memory: Investigating performance limitations in complex span tasks. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 90:303–17.
Dick, F., Leech, R., Moses, P. & Saccuman, M. C. (2006) The interplay of learning and development in shaping neural organization. Developmental Science 9:1417.
Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N., Hoffmann, R. R. & Feltovich, P. J. (2006) Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance. Cambridge University Press.
Ericsson, K. A. & Kintsch, W. (1995) Long-term working memory. Psychological Review 102:211–45.
Ericsson, K. A. & Lehmann, A. C. (1996) Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Reviews in Psychology 47:273305.
Falk, R. & Wilkening, F. (1998) Children's construction of fair chances: Adjusting probabilities. Developmental Psychology 34:1340–57.
Galotti, K. M., Komatsu, L. K. & Voelz, S. (1997) Children's differential performance on deductive and inductive syllogisms. Developmental Psychology 33:7078.
Howe, M. L. & Rabinowitz, F. M. (1996) Reasoning from memory: A lifespan inquiry into the necessity of remembering when reasoning about class inclusion. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 61:142.
Kyllonen, P. C. & Christal, R. E. (1990) Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence 14:389433.
Markovits, H. & Barrouillet, P. (2002) The development of conditional reasoning: A mental model account. Developmental Review 22:536.
Navarro, D. J., Griffiths, T. L., Steyvers, M. & Lee, M. D. (2006) Modeling individual differences using Dirichlet processes. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 50:101–22.
Oaksford, M. & Chater, N. (2007) Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford University Press.
Piaget, J. & Inhelder, B. (1975) The origin of the idea of chance in children. W. W. Norton.
Shultz, T. R. (2007) The Bayesian revolution approaches psychological development. Developmental Science 10:357–64.
Sobel, D. M., Tenenbaum, J. B. & Gopnik, A. (2004) Children's causal inferences from indirect evidence: Backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers. Cognitive Science 28:303–33.
Sternberg, R. J. (1999) Intelligence as developing expertise. Contemporary Educational Psychology 24:359–75.
Verhaeghen, P. & Salthouse, T. A. (1997) Meta-analyses of age-cognition relations in adulthood: Estimates of linear and nonlinear age effects and structural models. Psychological Bulletin 122:231–49.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed