Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 9
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Holliday, Shabnam J. 2016. The legacy of subalternity and Gramsci’s national–popular: populist discourse in the case of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Third World Quarterly, Vol. 37, Issue. 5, p. 917.


    Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira and Taggart, Paul 2016. Dealing with populists in government: a framework for analysis. Democratization, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 201.


    Ragazzoni, David 2016. Review. Global Discourse, Vol. 6, Issue. 1-2, p. 210.


    Herkman, Juha 2015. THE LIFE CYCLE MODEL AND PRESS COVERAGE OF NORDIC POPULIST PARTIES. Journalism Studies, p. 1.


    De Koster, Willem Achterberg, Peter Van der Waal, Jeroen Van Bohemen, Samira and Kemmers, Roy 2014. Progressiveness and the New Right: The Electoral Relevance of Culturally Progressive Values in the Netherlands. West European Politics, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 584.


    Wear, Rae 2014. Astroturf and populism in Australia: The Convoy of No Confidence. Australian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 49, Issue. 1, p. 54.


    Lepik, Krista and Carpentier, Nico 2013. Articulating the visitor in public knowledge institutions. Critical Discourse Studies, Vol. 10, Issue. 2, p. 136.


    De Cleen, Benjamin and Carpentier, Nico 2010. Contesting the populist claim on “the people” through popular culture: the 0110 concerts versus the Vlaams Belang. Social Semiotics, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 175.


    Meyer, John M. 2008. Populism, paternalism and the state of environmentalism in the US. Environmental Politics, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 219.


    ×

Epistemological requirements for a cognitive psychology of real people

  • John Campion (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X05270012
  • Published online: 01 February 2005
Abstract

Pothos's analysis is difficult to relate to real human mental processes. He tackles four quite different areas of psychology and adduces evidence from a large number of paradigms. Yet despite this very large scope, he employs a single, simplistic descriptive framework. An epistemological analysis, supported by illustrations from real world decision-making, shows that this steers us away from, rather than towards, an understanding of real human cognitive processes.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×