Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 120
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bigelow, Eric and Piantadosi, Steven T. 2016. A Large Dataset of Generalization Patterns in the Number Game. Journal of Open Psychology Data, Vol. 4, Issue. 1, p. 4.


    Hsu, Anne S. Horng, Andy Griffiths, Thomas L. and Chater, Nick 2016. When Absence of Evidence Is Evidence of Absence: Rational Inferences From Absent Data. Cognitive Science, p. n/a.


    Johnson, Samuel G.B. Rajeev-Kumar, Greeshma and Keil, Frank C. 2016. Sense-making under ignorance. Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 89, p. 39.


    Shahbazi, Reza Raizada, Rajeev and Edelman, Shimon 2016. Similarity, kernels, and the fundamental constraints on cognition. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 70, p. 21.


    Siedenburg, Kai Jones-Mollerup, Kiray and McAdams, Stephen 2016. Acoustic and Categorical Dissimilarity of Musical Timbre: Evidence from Asymmetries Between Acoustic and Chimeric Sounds. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,


    Archangeli, Diana and Pulleyblank, Douglas 2015. Phonology without universal grammar. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,


    Butler, Lucas P. Schmidt, Marco F. H. Bürgel, Jessica and Tomasello, Michael 2015. Young children use pedagogical cues to modulate the strength of normative inferences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 33, Issue. 4, p. 476.


    Cooper, Richard P. and Peebles, David 2015. Beyond Single-Level Accounts: The Role of Cognitive Architectures in Cognitive Scientific Explanation. Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. 7, Issue. 2, p. 243.


    Dunsmoor, Joseph E. and Murphy, Gregory L. 2015. Categories, concepts, and conditioning: how humans generalize fear. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 73.


    Falmagne, Jean-Claude and Lee, Michael D. 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.


    Gerken, LouAnn and Knight, Sara 2015. Infants generalize from just (the right) four words. Cognition, Vol. 143, p. 187.


    Gerken, LouAnn Dawson, Colin Chatila, Razanne and Tenenbaum, Josh 2015. Surprise! Infants consider possible bases of generalization for a single input example. Developmental Science, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 80.


    Gershman, Samuel J Norman, Kenneth A and Niv, Yael 2015. Discovering latent causes in reinforcement learning. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 5, p. 43.


    Harispe, Sébastien Ranwez, Sylvie Janaqi, Stefan and Montmain, Jacky 2015. Semantic Similarity from Natural Language and Ontology Analysis. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Heit, Evan 2015. Brain Imaging, Forward Inference, and Theories of Reasoning. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 8,


    Helie, Sebastien Ell, Shawn W. Filoteo, J. Vincent and Maddox, W. Todd 2015. Criterion learning in rule-based categorization: Simulation of neural mechanism and new data. Brain and Cognition, Vol. 95, p. 19.


    Hoffman, Donald D. Singh, Manish and Prakash, Chetan 2015. Probing the interface theory of perception: Reply to commentaries. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 22, Issue. 6, p. 1551.


    Kolodny, Oren and Edelman, Shimon 2015. The problem of multimodal concurrent serial order in behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 56, p. 252.


    Lidz, Jeffrey and Gagliardi, Annie 2015. How Nature Meets Nurture: Universal Grammar and Statistical Learning. Annual Review of Linguistics, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 333.


    Michael, E. de Gardelle, V. Nevado-Holgado, A. and Summerfield, C. 2015. Unreliable Evidence: 2 Sources of Uncertainty During Perceptual Choice. Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 937.


    ×

Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference

  • Joshua B. Tenenbaum (a1) and Thomas L. Griffiths (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000061
  • Published online: 01 August 2001
Abstract

Shepard has argued that a universal law should govern generalization across different domains of perception and cognition, as well as across organisms from different species or even different planets. Starting with some basic assumptions about natural kinds, he derived an exponential decay function as the form of the universal generalization gradient, which accords strikingly well with a wide range of empirical data. However, his original formulation applied only to the ideal case of generalization from a single encountered stimulus to a single novel stimulus, and for stimuli that can be represented as points in a continuous metric psychological space. Here we recast Shepard's theory in a more general Bayesian framework and show how this naturally extends his approach to the more realistic situation of generalizing from multiple consequential stimuli with arbitrary representational structure. Our framework also subsumes a version of Tversky's set-theoretic model of similarity, which is conventionally thought of as the primary alternative to Shepard's continuous metric space model of similarity and generalization. This unification allows us not only to draw deep parallels between the set-theoretic and spatial approaches, but also to significantly advance the explanatory power of set-theoretic models.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: