Skip to main content
×
Home

Human kinship, from conceptual structure to grammar

  • Doug Jones (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Research in anthropology has shown that kin terminologies have a complex combinatorial structure and vary systematically across cultures. This article argues that universals and variation in kin terminology result from the interaction of (1) an innate conceptual structure of kinship, homologous with conceptual structure in other domains, and (2) principles of optimal, “grammatical” communication active in language in general. Kin terms from two languages, English and Seneca, show how terminologies that look very different on the surface may result from variation in the rankings of a universal set of constraints. Constraints on kin terms form a system: some are concerned with absolute features of kin (sex), others with the position (distance and direction) of kin in “kinship space,” others with groups and group boundaries (matrilines, patrilines, generations, etc.). Also, kin terms sometimes extend indefinitely via recursion, and recursion in kin terminology has parallels with recursion in other areas of language. Thus the study of kinship sheds light on two areas of cognition, and their phylogeny. The conceptual structure of kinship seems to borrow its organization from the conceptual structure of space, while being specialized for representing genealogy. And the grammar of kinship looks like the product of an evolved grammar faculty, opportunistically active across traditional domains of semantics, syntax, and phonology. Grammar is best understood as an offshoot of a uniquely human capacity for playing coordination games.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Aissen J. (1999) Markedness and subject choice in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17:673711.
Archangeli D. & Langendoen D. T., ed. (1997) Optimality theory: An overview. Blackwell.
Bermúdez-Otero R. & Börjars K. (2006) Markedness in phonology and syntax: The problem of grounding. Lingua 116:710–56.
Bierwisch M. (1996) How much space gets into language? In: Language and space, ed. Bloom P., Peterson M. A., Nadel L. & Garrett M. F., pp. 3176. MIT Press.
Bloom P. (2000) How children learn the meanings of words. MIT Press.
Blutner R., Hoop H. D. & Hendriks P. (2006) Optimal communication. Center for the Study of Language and Information.
Buchler I. & Selby H. A. (1968) Kinship and social organization: An introduction to theory and method. Macmillan.
Carsten J. (1997) The heat of the hearth: The process of kinship in a Malay fishing community. Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
Dahl Ö. & Koptjevskaja-Tamm M. (2001) Kinship in grammar. In: Dimensions of possession, ed. Baron I., Herslund M. & Sørenson F., pp. 201–25. John Benjamins.
D'Andrade R. G. (1971) Procedures for predicting kinship terminology from features of social organization. In: Explorations in mathematical anthropology, ed. Kay P., pp. 6075. MIT Press.
Diesendruck G. & Markson L. (2001) Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: A pragmatic account. Developmental Psychology 37:630–44.
Evans N. (1999) Kinship verbs. In: Approaches to the typology of word classes, ed. Vogel P. M. & Comrie B.. Mouton de Gruyter.
Fox R. (1967) Kinship and marriage: An anthropological perspective. Penguin.
Frank S. A. (1998) Foundations of social evolution. Princeton University Press.
Goodenough W. (1965) Yankee kinship terminology: A problem in componential analysis. American Anthropologist 67(5):259–87.
Goodenough W. (1967) Componential analysis. Science 67:1203–209.
Gould S. (2000) A new system for the formal analysis of kinship. University Press of America.
Greenberg J. H. (1966) Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. Mouton.
Greenberg J. H. (1975) Research on language universals. Annual Review of Anthropology 4:7594.
Greenberg J. H. (1990) Universals of kinship terminology: Their nature and the problem of their explanation. In: On language: Selected writings of Joseph Greenberg, ed. Denning K. & Kemmer S., pp. 310–27. Stanford University Press.
Grimshaw J. (2005) Words and structure. Center for the Study of Words and Information.
Hage P. (1997) Unthinkable categories and the fundamental laws of kinship. American Ethnologist 24:652–67.
Hage P. (2001) Marking theory and kinship analysis. Anthropological Theory 1:197211.
Hauser M. D., Chomsky N. & Fitch T. (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569–79.
Heck F. & Müller G. (2006) Extremely local optimization. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Western Conference of Linguistics, vol. 17, ed. Bainbridge E. & Agbayani B., pp. 170–82. Department of Linguistics, California State University, Fresno.
Hirschfeld L. (1989) Rethinking the acquisition of kin terms. International Journal of Behavioral Development 12(4):541–68.
Hurford J. (2003) The neural basis of predicate-argument structure. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26:261–83.
Hurford J. (2007) The origins of meaning. Oxford.
Jackendoff R. (1983) Semantics and cognition. MIT Press.
Jackendoff R. (1991) Parts and boundaries. Cognition 41:945.
Jackendoff R. (2002) Foundations of language:Bbrain, meaning, grammar, and evolution. Oxford University Press.
Jones D. (2003a) The generative psychology of kinship, Part I: Cognitive universals and evolutionary psychology. Evolution and Human Behavior 24:303–19.
Jones D. (2003b) The generative psychology of kinship: Part II. Generating variation from universal building blocks with optimality theory. Evolution and Human Behavior 24:320–50.
Jones D. (2004) The universal psychology of kinship: Evidence from language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(5):211–15.
Jones D. (2010) Grammars of kinship and color: Cognitive universals and optimal communication. In: Kinship, language, and prehistory: Per Hage and the renaissance in kinship studies, ed. Jones D. & Milicic B., pp. 196211. University of Utah.
Kay P. (1975) The generative analysis of kinship semantics: A reanalysis of the Seneca data. Foundations of Language 13:201–14.
Kay P. & Maffi L. (1999) Color appearance and the emergence and evolution of basic color lexicons. American Anthropologist 101:743–60.
Keesing R. M. (1975) Kin groups and social structure. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Kroeber A. L. (1909) Classificatory systems of relationship. Journal of The Royal Anthropological Institute 39:7784.
Kronenfeld D. B. (1996) Plastic glasses and church fathers: Semantic extension from the ethnoscience tradition. Oxford University Press.
Kronenfeld D. B. (2006) Issues in the classification of kinship terminologies: Toward a new typology. Anthropos 101:203–19.
Kronenfeld D. B. (2009) Fanti kinship and the analysis of kinship terminologies. University of Illinois Press.
Leaf M. J. (2006) Experimental-formal analysis of kinship. Ethnology 45(4):305–30.
Legendre G., Grimshaw J. & Vikner S., ed. (2001) Optimality-theoretic syntax. MIT Press.
Legendre G., Sorace A. & Smolensky P. (2006) The optimality theory – harmonic grammar connection. In: The harmonic mind: From neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar, vol. 2: Linguistic and philosophical implications, ed. Smolensky P. & Legendre G., pp. 339402. MIT Press.
Lehman F. K. (Hlaing F. K. L. Chit) (1993) The relationship between genealogical and terminological structure in kinship terminologies. Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 4:95122.
Lehman F. K. (Hlaing F. K. L. Chit) (2001) Aspects of a formalist theory of kinship: The functional basis of genealogical roots and some extensions in generalized alliance theory. Anthropological Theory 1:212–38.
Levinson S. C. (2006a) Matrilineal clans and kin terms on Rossel Island. Anthropological Linguistics 48(1):143.
Levinson S. C. (2006b) On the human “interaction engine.” In: Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction, ed. Enfield N. J. & Levinson S. C., pp. 3969. Berg.
Levinson S. C. & Wilkins D. P. (2006) Patterns in the data: Towards a semantic typology of spatial descriptions. In: Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, ed. Levinson S. C. & Wilkins D. P., pp. 512–52. Cambridge University Press.
Lévi-Strauss C. (1963) Structural anthropology. Basic Books.
Lévi-Strauss C. (1969) The elementary structures of kinship. Beacon.
Lounsbury F. (1964a) The structural analysis of kinship semantics. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Linguistics, ed. Hunt H. G.. pp. 1073–93. Mouton.
Lounsbury F. (1964b) The formal analysis of Crow- and Omaha-type kinship terminologies. In: Explorations in cultural anthropology: Essays in honor of George Peter Murdock, ed. Goodenough W. H., pp. 351–93. McGraw-Hill.
McCarthy J. J. (2001) A thematic survey of optimality theory. Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy J. J. (2007a) Hidden generalizations: Phonological opacity in optimality theory. Equinox.
Morgan L. H. (1954/1851) League of the Ho-de'-no–sau-nee, or Iroquois (2 volumes) Human Relations Area Files.
Morgan L. H. (1997/1871) Systems of consanguinity and affinity of the human family. University of Nebraska Press.
Müller G. (2003) Local versus global optimization in syntax: A case study. www.uni-leipzig.de/~muellerg/mu36.pdf.
Murdock G. P. (1970) Kin term patterns and their distribution. Ethnology 9(2):165208.
Needham R. (1958) A structural analysis of Purum society. American Anthropologist 60:75101.
Nerlove S. & Romney A. K. (1967) Sibling terminology and cross-sex behavior. American Anthropologist 69:179–87.
Palmer R. A. (1934) The North American Indians: An account of the American Indians north of Mexico, compiled from the original sources. Smithsonian.
Parkin R. (1997) Kinship: An introduction to basic concepts. Blackwell.
Pinker S. (1989) Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. MIT Press.
Pinker S. (2007) The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. Viking.
Prince A. (2007) Let the decimal system do it for you: A very simple utility function for OT. Rutgers Optimality Archive #943–1207. roa.rutgers.edu.
Prince A. & Smolensky P. (2004/1993) Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Blackwell.
Read D. (1984) An algebraic account of the American kinship terminology. Current Anthropology 25:417–49.
Read D. (2001a) Formal analysis of kinship terminologies and its relationship to what constitutes kinship. Anthropological Theory 1(2):239–67.
Read D. (2001b) What is kinship? In: The cultural analysis of kinship: The legacy of David Schneider and its implications for anthropological relativism, ed. Feinberg R. & Ottenheimer M., pp. 78117. University of Illinois Press.
Romney A. K. & D'Andrade R. (1964) Cognitive aspects of English kinship. American Anthropologist 67:146–70.
Scheffler H. W. (1968) Australian kin classification. Cambridge University Press.
Scheffler H. W. & Lounsbury F. G. (1971) A study in structural semantics: The Siriono kinship system. Prentice-Hall.
Schneider D. (1984) A critique of the study of kinship. University of Michigan Press.
Seyfarth R. & Cheney D. (2008) Primate social knowledge and the origins of language. Mind and Society 7:129–42.
Shapiro W. (2008) What human kinship is primarily about: Toward a critique of the new kinship studies. Social Anthropology 16:137–53.
Smolensky P. & Legendre G. (2006) Harmony optimization and the computational architecture of the mind/brain. In: The harmonic mind: From neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar, vol. 1: Cognitive architecture, ed. Smolensky P. & Legendre G., pp. 361. MIT Press.
Sousa P. (2003) The fall of kinship: Towards an epidemiological explanation. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3(4):265303.
Sperber D. & Wilson D. (1995/1986) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell.
Stone L. (2000) Kinship and gender: An introduction. Westview.
Talmy L. (2000a) The relation of grammar to cognition. In: Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. I, ed. Talmy L., pp. 2196. Cambridge University Press.
Talmy L. (2000b) How language structures space. In: Toward a cognitive semantics, vol. I, ed. Talmy L.. pp. 177254. Cambridge University Press.
Tesar B. & Smolensky P. (2000) Learnability in optimality theory. MIT Press.
Tomasello M., Carpenter M., Call J., Behne T. & Moll H. (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28:675735.
Trautmann T. R. (1987) Lewis Henry Morgan and the invention of kinship. University of California.
Wallace A. F. C. & Atkins J. (1960) The meaning of kinship terms. American Anthropologist 62:5780.
Wierzbicka A. (1996) Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford University Press.
Woolford E. (1984) Universals and role options in kinship terminology: A synthesis of three formal approaches. American Ethnologist 11:771–90.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 64 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 172 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.