Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Human kinship, from conceptual structure to grammar

  • Doug Jones (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Research in anthropology has shown that kin terminologies have a complex combinatorial structure and vary systematically across cultures. This article argues that universals and variation in kin terminology result from the interaction of (1) an innate conceptual structure of kinship, homologous with conceptual structure in other domains, and (2) principles of optimal, “grammatical” communication active in language in general. Kin terms from two languages, English and Seneca, show how terminologies that look very different on the surface may result from variation in the rankings of a universal set of constraints. Constraints on kin terms form a system: some are concerned with absolute features of kin (sex), others with the position (distance and direction) of kin in “kinship space,” others with groups and group boundaries (matrilines, patrilines, generations, etc.). Also, kin terms sometimes extend indefinitely via recursion, and recursion in kin terminology has parallels with recursion in other areas of language. Thus the study of kinship sheds light on two areas of cognition, and their phylogeny. The conceptual structure of kinship seems to borrow its organization from the conceptual structure of space, while being specialized for representing genealogy. And the grammar of kinship looks like the product of an evolved grammar faculty, opportunistically active across traditional domains of semantics, syntax, and phonology. Grammar is best understood as an offshoot of a uniquely human capacity for playing coordination games.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Ö. Dahl & M. Koptjevskaja-Tamm (2001) Kinship in grammar. In: Dimensions of possession, ed. I. Baron , M. Herslund & F. Sørenson , pp. 201–25. John Benjamins.

R. Jackendoff (2002) Foundations of language:Bbrain, meaning, grammar, and evolution. Oxford University Press.

S. C. Levinson & D. P. Wilkins (2006) Patterns in the data: Towards a semantic typology of spatial descriptions. In: Grammars of space: Explorations in cognitive diversity, ed. S. C. Levinson & D. P. Wilkins , pp. 512–52. Cambridge University Press.

J. J. McCarthy (2001) A thematic survey of optimality theory. Cambridge University Press.

A. Prince & P. Smolensky (2004/1993) Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Blackwell.

D. Schneider (1984) A critique of the study of kinship. University of Michigan Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 19
Total number of PDF views: 38 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 112 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.