Skip to main content Accessibility help

The importance of ontogenetic change in typical and atypical development

  • Tessa M. Dekker (a1) and Annette Karmiloff-Smith (a1)


The compelling case that Anderson makes for neural reuse and against modularity as organizing principle of the brain is further supported by evidence from developmental disorders. However, to provide a full evolutionary-developmental theory of neural reuse that encompasses both typical and atypical development, Anderson's “massive redeployment hypothesis” (MRH) could be further constrained by considering brain development across ontogeny.



Hide All
Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Mills, D., Galaburda, A. & Korenberg, J. R. (1999) Bridging cognition, the brain and modular genetics: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Trends in Neuroscience 22:197207.
Brown, J., Johnson, M. H., Paterson, S., Gilmore, R., Gsödl, M., Longhi, E. & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2003) Spatial representation and attention in toddlers with Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. Neuropsychologia 41:1037–46.
Dehaene, S. (2005) Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The “neuronal recycling” hypothesis. In: From monkey brain to human brain, ed. Dehaene, S., Duhamel, J.-R., Hauser, M. D. & Rizolatti, G., pp. 133–57. MIT Press.
Elsabbagh, M., Cohen, H., Cohen, M., Rosen, S. & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (in press) Severity of hyperacusis predicts individual differences in speech perception in Williams syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.
Han, S. & Northoff, G. (2008) Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: A transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 9:646–54.
Johnson, M. H. (2001) Functional brain development in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2:475–83.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1998) Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2:389–98.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2009) Nativism versus neuroconstructivism: Rethinking the study of developmental disorders. Developmental Psychology 45(1):5663.
Karmiloff-Smith, A., Thomas, M. S. C., Annaz, D., Humphreys, K., Ewing, S., Brace, N., van Duuren, M., Pike, G., Grice, S. & Campbell, R. (2004) Exploring the Williams syndrome face processing debate: The importance of building developmental trajectories. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45:1258–74.
Orban, G. A., Van Essen, D. & Vanduffel, W. (2004) Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:315–24.
Paterson, S. J., Brown, J. H., Gsodl, M. K., Johnson, M. H. & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1999) Cognitive modularity and genetic disorders. Science 286:2355–58.
Pinker, S. (1999) Words and rules: The ingredients of language. Basic Books.
Rossen, M., Klima, E. S., Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A. & Jones, W. (1996) Interaction between language and cognition: Evidence from Williams syndrome. In: Language, learning, and behavior disorders: Developmental, biological, and clinical perspectives, ed. Beitchman, J. H., Cohen, N., Konstantareas, M. & Tannock, R., pp 367–92. Cambridge University Press.
Southgate, V. & Hamilton, A. F. (2008) Unbroken mirrors: Challenging a theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12:225–29.
Van Herwegen, J., Ansari, D., Xu, F. & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2008) Small and large number processing in infants and toddlers with Williams syndrome. Developmental Science 11:637–43.
von Melchner, L., Pallas, L. L. & Sur, M. (2000) Visual behavior mediated by retinal projections directed to the auditory pathway. Nature (London) 404:871–76.

The importance of ontogenetic change in typical and atypical development

  • Tessa M. Dekker (a1) and Annette Karmiloff-Smith (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed