Skip to main content Accessibility help

Inferring cognition from action: Does martyrdom imply its motive?

  • David J. Weiss (a1) and Jie Weiss (a2)


Drawing inferences about the decision utilities of suicide terrorists from their final action is tempting, but hazardous. Direct elicitation of those utilities would be more informative, but is infeasible. Substituting examination of archival materials for elicitation makes the assumption that leaders and bombers have similar utilities. Insight regarding the beliefs of terrorist leaders might be available from observations of recruitment strategies.



Hide All
Fischhoff, B. (1991) Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? American Psychologist 46:p835–47.
Keeney, G. L. & von Winterfeldt, D. (2010) Identifying and structuring the objectives of terrorists. Risk Analysis 30:1803–16.
Lankford, A. (2013c) The myth of martyrdom: What really drives suicide bombers, rampage shooter, and other self-destructive killers. Palgrave Macmillan.
Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84:231–59.
Weiss, J. W. & Weiss, D. J. (2012) Irrational: At the moment. Synthese 189:173–83.
Weiss, J. W., Weiss, D. J. & Edwards, W. (2010) A descriptive multi-attribute utility model for everyday decisions. Theory and Decision 68:101–14.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed