Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 496
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Buckwalter, Wesley 2016. Intuition Fail: Philosophical Activity and the Limits of Expertise. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 92, Issue. 2, p. 378.

    Fragkos, Konstantinos C. Tsagris, Michail and Frangos, Christos C. 2016. Exploring the Distribution for the Estimator of Rosenthal's ‘Fail-Safe’ Number of Unpublished Studies in Meta-analysis. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, p. 00.

    Li, Zheng and Rubie-Davies, Christine Margaret 2016. Teachers matter: expectancy effects in Chinese university English-as-a-foreign-language classrooms. Studies in Higher Education, p. 1.

    Cilliers, Jacobus Dube, Oeindrila and Siddiqi, Bilal 2015. The white-man effect: How foreigner presence affects behavior in experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol. 118, p. 397.

    DerSimonian, Rebecca and Laird, Nan 2015. Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemporary Clinical Trials, Vol. 45, p. 139.

    Dragioti, Elena Dimoliatis, Ioannis Fountoulakis, Konstantinos N. and Evangelou, Evangelos 2015. A systematic appraisal of allegiance effect in randomized controlled trials of psychotherapy. Annals of General Psychiatry, Vol. 14, Issue. 1,

    Firestone, Chaz and Scholl, Brian J. 2015. Can you experience ‘top-down’ effects on perception?: The case of race categories and perceived lightness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 22, Issue. 3, p. 694.

    Friedrich, Alena Flunger, Barbara Nagengast, Benjamin Jonkmann, Kathrin and Trautwein, Ulrich 2015. Pygmalion effects in the classroom: Teacher expectancy effects on students' math achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 41, p. 1.

    Haas, Henriette S. Pisarzewska Fuerst, Maja Tönz, Patrick and Gubser-Ernst, Jutta 2015. Analyzing the Psychological and Social Contents of Evidence-Experimental Comparison between Guessing, Naturalistic Observation, and Systematic Analysis. Journal of Forensic Sciences, Vol. 60, Issue. 3, p. 659.

    Kim, Hyun Sik 2015. Foregone opportunities: unveiling teacher expectancy effects in kindergarten using counterfactual predictions. Social Psychology of Education, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 273.

    Ko, Andrew J. LaToza, Thomas D. and Burnett, Margaret M. 2015. A practical guide to controlled experiments of software engineering tools with human participants. Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 110.

    Lee, Dabae Arthur, Ian T. and Morrone, Anastasia S. 2015. Using video surveillance footage to support validity of self-reported classroom data. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, p. 1.

    Lynn, Michael and Kwortnik, Robert J. 2015. The effects of tipping policies on customer satisfaction: A test from the cruise industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 51, p. 15.

    Melia, Michael Schmidt, Martin Geissler, Britta König, Jochem Krahn, Ulrike Ottersbach, Hans Jürgen Letzel, Stephan and Muttray, Axel 2015. Measuring mechanical pain: The refinement and standardization of pressure pain threshold measurements. Behavior Research Methods, Vol. 47, Issue. 1, p. 216.

    Mizala, Alejandra Martínez, Francisco and Martínez, Salomé 2015. Pre-service elementary school teachers' expectations about student performance: How their beliefs are affected by their mathematics anxiety and student's gender. Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 50, p. 70.

    Moloney, Paul 2015. Critical Psychotherapy, Psychoanalysis and Counselling.

    Moola, Sandeep Munn, Zachary Sears, Kim Sfetcu, Raluca Currie, Marian Lisy, Karolina Tufanaru, Catalin Qureshi, Rubab Mattis, Patrick and Mu, Peifan 2015. Conducting systematic reviews of association (etiology). International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare, Vol. 13, Issue. 3, p. 163.

    Rivard, Jillian R. Pena, Michelle M. and Schreiber Compo, Nadja 2015. “Blind” interviewing: Is ignorance bliss?. Memory, p. 1.

    Rosenthal, Robert 2015. Reflections on the origins of meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, Vol. 6, Issue. 3, p. 240.

    Rosnow, Ralph L. and Strohmetz, David B. 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.


Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studies

  • Robert Rosenthal (a1) and Donald B. Rubin (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2010

The research area of interpersonal expectancy effects originally derived from a general consideration of the effects of experimenters on the results of their research. One of these is the expectancy effect, the tendency for experimenters to obtain results they expect, not simply because they have correctly anticipated nature's response but rather because they have helped to shape that response through their expectations. When behavioral researchers expect certain results from their human (or animal) subjects they appear unwittingly to treat them in such a way as to increase the probability that they will respond as expected.

In the first few years of research on this problem of the interpersonal (or interorganism) self-fulfilling prophecy, the “prophet” was always an experimenter and the affected phenomenon was always the behavior of an experimental subject. In more recent years, however, the research has been extended from experimenters to teachers, employers, and therapists whose expectations for their pupils, employees, and patients might also come to serve as interpersonal self-fulfilling prophecies.

Our general purpose is to summarize the results of 345 experiments investigating interpersonal expectancy effects. These studies fall into eight broad categories of research: reaction time, inkblot tests, animal learning, laboratory interviews, psychophysical judgments, learning and ability, person perception, and everyday life situations. For the entire sample of studies, as well as for each specific research area, we (1) determine the overall probability that interpersonal expectancy effects do in fact occur, (2) estimate their average magnitude so as to evaluate their substantive and methodological importance, and (3) illustrate some methods that may be useful to others wishing to summarize quantitatively entire bodies of research (a practice that is, happily, on the increase).

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

. : . .T. X. Barber Pitfalls in Human Research: Ten Pivotal Points New YorkPergamon Press1976

J. Cooper , L. Eisenberg , J. Robert , and B. S. Dohrenwend The effect of experimenter expectancy and preparatory effort on belief in the probable occurrence of future events. Journal of Social Psychology. 71:221–26. 1967.

J. A. Hall Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin. 85:845–57. 1978.

A. R. Jensen How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review. 39:1123. 1969.

R. Rosenthal Empirical vs. decreed validation of clocks and tests. American Educational Research Journal. 6:689–91. 1969a.

R. Rosenthal Combining results of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin 85:185–93. 1978.

R. Rosenthal and K. L. Fode The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat. Behavioral Science 8:183–89. 1963.

R. Rosenthal and R. Lawson A longitudinal study of the effects of experimenter bias on the operant learning of laboratory rats. Journal of Psychiatric Research 2:6172. 1964.

M. L. Smith and G. V. Glass Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist. 32:752–60. 1977.

R. L. Thorndike Review of Pygmalion in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal 5:708–11. 1968.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *