Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studies

  • Robert Rosenthal (a1) and Donald B. Rubin (a2)

Abstract

The research area of interpersonal expectancy effects originally derived from a general consideration of the effects of experimenters on the results of their research. One of these is the expectancy effect, the tendency for experimenters to obtain results they expect, not simply because they have correctly anticipated nature's response but rather because they have helped to shape that response through their expectations. When behavioral researchers expect certain results from their human (or animal) subjects they appear unwittingly to treat them in such a way as to increase the probability that they will respond as expected.

In the first few years of research on this problem of the interpersonal (or interorganism) self-fulfilling prophecy, the “prophet” was always an experimenter and the affected phenomenon was always the behavior of an experimental subject. In more recent years, however, the research has been extended from experimenters to teachers, employers, and therapists whose expectations for their pupils, employees, and patients might also come to serve as interpersonal self-fulfilling prophecies.

Our general purpose is to summarize the results of 345 experiments investigating interpersonal expectancy effects. These studies fall into eight broad categories of research: reaction time, inkblot tests, animal learning, laboratory interviews, psychophysical judgments, learning and ability, person perception, and everyday life situations. For the entire sample of studies, as well as for each specific research area, we (1) determine the overall probability that interpersonal expectancy effects do in fact occur, (2) estimate their average magnitude so as to evaluate their substantive and methodological importance, and (3) illustrate some methods that may be useful to others wishing to summarize quantitatively entire bodies of research (a practice that is, happily, on the increase).

Copyright

References

Hide All
Anderson, D. F. Mediation of teachers' expectancy with normal and retarded children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1971.
Barber, T. X.Pitfalls in Human Research: Ten Pivotal Points. New York: Pergamon Press. 1976.
Barber, T. X. and Silver, M. J.Fact, fiction, and the experimenter bias effect. Psychological Bulletin Monograph Supplement 70:129. 1968.
Beez, W. V. Influence of biased psychological reports on “teacher” behavior and pupil performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1970.
Blake, B. F., and Heslin, R.Evaluation apprehension and subject bias in experiments. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality 5:5763. 1971.
Burnham, J. R. Experimenter bias and lesion labeling. Unpublished manuscript, Purdue University, 1966.
Carter, R. M. Locus of control and teacher expectancy as related to achievement of young school children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, 1969.
Cohen, J.Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1969; Rev. ed., 1977.
Cooper, J., Eisenberg, L., Robert, J., and Dohrenwend, B. S.The effect of experimenter expectancy and preparatory effort on belief in the probable occurrence of future events. Journal of Social Psychology. 71:221–26. 1967.
Elashoff, J. D., and Snow, R. E. A case study in statistical inference: Reconsideration of the Rosenthal-Jacobson data on teacher expectancy. Technical Report No. 15, Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching, School of Education, Stanford University, December, 1970.
Elashoff, J. D., and Snow, R. E. (eds.), Pygmalion Reconsidered. Worthington, Ohio: Charles A. Jones, 1971.
Glass, G. V.Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research.Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association,San Francisco, April, 1976.
Gravitz, H. L. Examiner expectancy effects in psychological assessment: The Bender Visual Motor Gestalt Test. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tennessee, 1969.
Hall, J. A.Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin. 85:845–57. 1978.
Hall, J. A., Rosenthal, R., Archer, D., DiMatteo, M. R., and Rogers, P. L. The profile of nonverbal sensitivity. In: McReynolds, P. (ed.), Advances in Psychological Assessment, vol. 4. Pp. 179221. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1978.
Hawthorne, J. W. The influence of the set and dependence of the data collector on the experimenter bias effect. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Duke University, 1972.
Jensen, A. R.How much can we boost IQ and scholastic achievement? Harvard Educational Review. 39:1123. 1969.
Johnson, R. W. Inducement of expectancy and set of subjects as determinants of subjects' responses in experimenter expectancy research. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Manitoba, 1970.
Johnson, R. W. and Adair, J. G.The effects of systematic recording error vs. experimenter bias on latency of word association. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality. 4:270–75. 1970.
Johnson, R. W.Experimenter expectancy vs. systematic recording error under automated and nonautomated stimulus presentation. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality. 6:8894. 1972.
Keshock, J. D. An investigation of the effects of the expectancy phenomenon upon the intelligence, achievement and motivation of inner-city elementary school children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, 1970.
Marwit, S. J. An investigation of the communication of tester-bias by means of modeling. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1968.
Maxwell, M. L. A study of the effects of teacher expectation on the I.Q. and academic performance of children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve University, 1970.
Mayo, C. C. External conditions affecting experimental bias. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Houston, 1972.
Miller, K. A. A study of “experimenter bias” and “subject awareness” as demand characteristic artifacts in attitude change experiments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bowling Green State University, 1970.
Mosteller, F., and Bush, R. R. Selected quantitative techniques. In: Lindzey, G. (ed.), Handbook of Social Psychology, vol. I. Pp. 289334. Cambridge, Mass.: Addis on-Wesley, 1954.
Page, J. S. Experimenter-subject interaction in the verbal conditioning experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, 1970.
Rosenthal, R.Experimenter expectancy and the reassuring nature of the null hypothesis decision procedure. Psychological Bulletin Monograph Supplement. 70:3047. 1968.
Rosenthal, R.Empirical vs. decreed validation of clocks and tests. American Educational Research Journal. 6:689–91. 1969a.
Rosenthal, R. Interpersonal expectations: Effects of the experimenter's hypothesis. In: Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R. L. (eds.), Artifact in Behavioral Research. Pp. 181277. New York: Academic Press, 1969b.
Rosenthal, R. Teacher expectations and their effects upon children. In: Lesser, G. S. (ed.), Psychology and Educational Practice. Pp. 6787. Glenview, Ill.: Scott, Foresman, 1971.
Rosenthal, R.On the Social Psychology of the Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: Further Evidence for Pygmalion Effects and Their Mediating Mechanisms. New York: MSS Modular Publication, Module 53, 1973.
Rosenthal, R.Experimenter Effects in Behavioral Research. New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts, 1966. Rev. ed., New York: Irvington, 1976.
Rosenthal, R.Combining results of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin 85:185–93. 1978.
Rosenthal, R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, in press, 1979.
Rosenthal, R. How often are our numbers wrong? American Psychologist, in press, 1979a.
Rosenthal, R. and Fode, K. L.The effect of experimenter bias on the performance of the albino rat. Behavioral Science 8:183–89. 1963.
Rosenthal, R.Hall, J. A., Archer, D., DiMatteo, M. R., and Rogers, P. L. The PONS test: Measuring sensitivity to nonverbal cues. In: Weitz, S. (ed.), Nonverbal communication. Rev. ed., Oxford University Press, in press.
Rosenthal, R., Hall, J. A., DiMatteo, M. R., Rogers, P. L., and Archer, D.Sensitivity to Nonverbal Communication: The PONS Test. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, in press.
Rosenthal, R. and Jacobson, L.Pygmalion in the Classroom. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1968.
Rosenthal, R. and Lawson, R.A longitudinal study of the effects of experimenter bias on the operant learning of laboratory rats. Journal of Psychiatric Research 2:6172. 1964.
Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R. L.The Volunteer Subject. New York: Wiley- Interscience, 1975.
Rosenthal, R. and Rubin, D. B. Pygmalion reaffirmed. In: Elashoff, J. D. and Snow, R. E. (eds.), Pygmalion Reconsidered. Pp. 139155. Worthington, Ohio: Charles A. Jones, 1971.
Seaver, W. B. Jr. Effects of naturally induced teacher expectancies on the academic performance of pupils in primary grades. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, 1971.
Smith, M. L. and Glass, G. V.Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist. 32:752–60. 1977.
Snedecor, G. W. and Cochran, W. G.Statistical Methods. 6th ed.Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press, 1967.
Thorndike, R. L.Review of Pygmalion in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal 5:708–11. 1968.
Todd, J. L. Social evaluation orientation, task orientation, and deliberate cuing in experimenter bias effect. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles, 1971.
Wellons, K. W. The expectancy component in mental retardation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1973.
Yarom, N. Temporal localization and communication of experimenter expectancy effect with 10–11 year old children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1971.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed