Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-mblfh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-26T09:05:40.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interpreting self-ascriptions

Review products

Commentary onCopnikAlison (1993) How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality. BBS 16:1–14.

Commentary onGoldmanAlvin I. (1993) The psychology of folk psychology. BBS 16:15–28.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

J. van Brakel
Affiliation:
Institute of Philosophy, University of Leuven, Kardinaal Mercierplein 2, 3000 Leuven, Belgium, brakel@phil.ruu.nl

Abstract

I argue that the same general principles apply in ascribing mental states and their contents to self and to others. Nevertheless Goldman is right that there is such a thing as FPA (First Person Authority). But Gopnik is right that FPA cannot be explained by reference to a special way of knowing or a special land of knowledge.

Information

Type
Continuing Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable