Skip to main content
×
Home

Languages of thought need to be distinguished from learning mechanisms, and nothing yet rules out multiple distinctively human learning systems

  • Michael Tetzlaff (a1) and Peter Carruthers (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

We distinguish the question whether only human minds are equipped with a language of thought (LoT) from the question whether human minds employ a single uniquely human learning mechanism. Thus separated, our answer to both questions is negative. Even very simple minds employ a LoT. And the comparative data reviewed by Penn et al. actually suggest that there are many distinctively human learning mechanisms.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Barrett H. C. & Kurzban R. (2006) Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate. Psychological Review 113:628–47.
Carruthers P. (2006) The architecture of the mind: Massive modularity and the flexibility of thought. Oxford University Press.
Collett M. & Collett T. S. (2000) How do insects use path integration for their navigation? Biological Cybernetics 83(3):245–59.
Collett M., Harland D. & Collett T. S. (2002) The use of landmarks and panoramic context in the performance of local vectors by navigating honeybees. The Journal of Experimental Biology 205(6):807–14.
Collett T. S., Fry S. N. & Wehner R. (1993) Sequence learning by honey bees. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 172(6):693706.
Dyer F. C. & Dickinson J. A. (1996) Sun-compass learning in insects: Representation in a simple mind. Current Directions in Psychological Science 5(3):6772.
Fodor J. A. (1987) Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. MIT Press.
Gallistel C. R. (1998) Symbolic processes in the brain: The case of insect navigation. In: An invitation to cognitive science, vol. 4: Methods, models, and conceptual issues, 2nd edition, ed. Osherson D.. MIT Press.
Giurfa M., Zhang S., Jenett A., Menzel R. & Srinivasan M. V. (2001) The concepts of “sameness” and “difference” in an insect. Nature 410(6831):930–33.
Marcus G. F. (2001) The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science. MIT Press.
Menzel R., Greggers U., Smith A., Berger S., Brandt R., Brunke S., Bundrock G., Hülse S., Plümpe T., Schaupp F., Schüttler E., Stach S., Stindt J., Stollhoff N. & Watzl S. (2005) Honeybees navigate according to a map-like spatial memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102(8):3040–45.
Riley J. R., Greggers U., Smith A. D., Stach S., Reynolds D. R., Stollhoff N., Brandt R., Schaupp F. & Menzel R. (2003) The automatic pilot of honeybees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 270(1532):2421–24.
Tetzlaff M. J. (2006) Bee-ing there: The systematicity of honeybee navigation supports a classical theory of honeybee cognition. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1903/3507.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 11 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 88 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.