Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Linguistics, cognitive psychology, and the Now-or-Never bottleneck

  • Ansgar D. Endress (a1) and Roni Katzir (a2)
Abstract

Christiansen & Chater (C&C)'s key premise is that “if linguistic information is not processed rapidly, that information is lost for good” (sect. 1, para. 1). From this “Now-or-Never bottleneck” (NNB), C&C derive “wide-reaching and fundamental implications for language processing, acquisition and change as well as for the structure of language itself” (sect. 2, para. 10). We question both the premise and the consequentiality of its purported implications.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Börschinger, B. & Johnson, M. (2011) A particle filter algorithm for Bayesian word segmentation. In: Proceedings of the Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop, Canberra, Australia, ed. Mollá, D. & Martinez, D., pp. 1018.
Carey, S. & Bartlett, E. (1978) Acquiring a single word. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development 15:1729.
Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. (2008) Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 31(05):489–58.
Elman, J. L. (1990) Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14(2):179211.
Endress, A. D. & Potter, M. C. (2014b) Something from (almost) nothing: Buildup of object memory from forgettable single fixations. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 76:2413–23.
Evans, N. & Levinson, S. (2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32:429–92.
Frank, M., Goldwater, S., Griffiths, T. & Tenenbaum, J. (2010) Modeling human performance in statistical word segmentation. Cognition 117:107–25.
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982) Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Departments of Linguistics and Philosophy, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Levy, R. (2008) Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106:1126–77.
Major, G. & Tank, D. (2004) Persistent neural activity: Prevalence and mechanisms. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14(6):675–84.
Markson, L. & Bloom, P. (1997) Evidence against a dedicated system for word learning in children. Nature 385:813–15.
McCauley, S. M. & Christiansen, M. H. (2011) Learning simple statistics for language comprehension and production: The CAPPUCCINO model. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA, July 2011. pp. 1619–24, ed. Carlson, L. A., Hölscher, C. & Shipley, T. F.. Cognitive Science Society.
Niyogi, P. & Berwick, R. C. (2009) The proper treatment of language acquisition and change in a population setting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:10124–29.
Pulman, S. G. (1986) Grammars, parsers, and memory limitations. Language and Cognitive Processes 1(3):197225.
Rizzi, L. (1990) Relativized minimality. MIT Press.
Ross, J. R. (1967) Constraints on variables in syntax. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Linguistics, MIT.
Schwab, E. C., Nusbaum, H. C. & Pisoni, D. B. (1985) Some effects of training on the perception of synthetic speech. Human Factors 27:395408.
Seitz, A. R. & Watanabe, T. (2003) Psychophysics: Is subliminal learning really passive? Nature 422:36.
Watanabe, T., Náñez, J. E. & Sasaki, Y. (2001) Perceptual learning without perception. Nature 413:844–48.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed