Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-kp629 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T03:16:03.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The missing dimension: The relevance of people's conception of time

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2014

Sarah H. Norgate ,
Nigel Davies ,
Chris Speed ,
Tom Cherrett  and
Janet Dickinson
Sarah H. Norgate
Affiliation:
School of Health Sciences, University of Salford, Greater Manchester M6 6PU, United Kingdom. S.H.Norgate@salford.ac.uk http://www.seek.salford.ac.uk:80/pp.jsp?NorgateSarah1374
Nigel Davies
Affiliation:
School of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YR, United Kingdom. nigel@comp.lancs.ac.uk
Chris Speed
Affiliation:
Edinburgh College of Art, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 9DF, Scotland, United Kingdom. c.speed@ed.ac.uk
Tom Cherrett
Affiliation:
Transportation Research Group, University of Southampton, Southampton S017 1BJ, United Kingdom. T.J.Cherrett@soton.ac.uk
Janet Dickinson
Affiliation:
School of Tourism, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth BH12 5BB, United Kingdom. JDickinson@bournemouth.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

While a timely conceptual innovation for the digital age, the “map” proposed by Bentley et al. would benefit from strengthening through the inclusion of a non–clock-time perspective. In this way, there could be new hypotheses developed which could be applied and tested relevant to more diverse societies, cultures, and individuals.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 37 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 93 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Avnet, T. & Sellier, A.-L. (2011) Clock time vs. event time: Temporal culture or self-regulation? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47:665–67. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2011.01.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dake, K. (1991) Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 22:61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Güss, C. D. & Dörner, D. (2011) Cultural differences in dynamic decision-making strategies in a non-linear, time-delayed task. Cognitive Systems Research 12:365–76. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.12.003.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1959) The silent language. Doubleday.Google Scholar
Levine, R. (1997) A geography of time: The temporal misadventures of a social psychologist. Or how every culture keeps time just a little bit differently. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lindquist, J. D. & Kaufman-Scarborough, C. J. (2007) The Polychronic-Monochronic Tendency Model: PMTS scale development and validation. Time and Society 16 (2/3):269–301. doi: 10.1177/0961463X07080270.Google Scholar
MMG (Miniwatts Marketing Group) (2013) Asia Internet use, population data and Facebook statistics. [Online publication.] Available at: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm Google Scholar
Norgate, S. H., Winstanley, C., Davies, N., Smith, L., Harding, M., Speed, C., et al. (2013) Smarter cities for pedestrians: Innovating real-time information systems to promote walking school buses. Paper presented at DE2013: Open Digital – The Fourth Annual Digital Economy All Hands Meeting. MediaCity, UK, Salford, November 4–6, 2013.Google Scholar
Tsuji, Y. (2006) Railway Time and Rubber Time: The paradox in the Japanese conception of time. Time and Society 15 (2/3):177–95. doi: 10.1177/0961463X06066950.Google Scholar
Zerubavel, E. (1982) The standardization of time: A sociohistorical perspective. The American Journal of Sociology 88(1):1–23.Google Scholar
Zimbardo, P. G. & Boyd, J. N. (1999) Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual differences metric. Journal of Personality a Social Psychology 77(6):1271–88.Google Scholar