Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-pjp64 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-25T07:37:44.964Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Motion as a reference for positions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

Wim van de Grind
Wim van de Grind
Affiliation:
Department of Functional Neurobiology, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands. w.a.vandegrind@uu.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Is the position of a moving target “predicted”? I argue that we should regard moving targets as the natural (veridical) position references. Motion is probably perceptually absolute, whereas position and time are relative quantities, as in physics. According to this view, processing delays are incorporated in the abstract local signs of motion signals. The flash-lag effect is one case in point.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 218 - 219
Copyright
Copyright ©Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Berry, M. J., Brivanlou, I. H., Jordan, T. A. & Meister, M. (1999) Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina. Nature 398(6725):334–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cantor, C. R. L. & Schor, C. M. (2007) Stimulus dependence of the flash-lag effect. Vision Research 47:2841–54.Google Scholar
Hazelhoff, F. & Wiersma, H. (1924) Die Wahrnehmungszeit I. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 96:171–88.Google Scholar
Hazelhoff, F. & Wiersma, H. (1925) Die Wahrnehmungszeit II. Zeitschrift für Psychologie 97:174–90.Google Scholar
Koenderink, J. J. (1984a) The concept of local sign. In: Limits in perception, ed. van Doorn, A. J., van de Grind, W.A. & Koenderink, J. J., pp. 495–547. VNU Science Press.Google Scholar
Koenderink, J. J. (1984b) Simultaneous order in nervous nets from a functional standpoint. Biological Cybernetics 50:35–41.Google Scholar
Lankheet, M. J. M. & van de Grind, W. (in press) Simultaneity versus asynchrony of visual motion and luminance changes. In: Space and time in perception and action, ed. Nijhawan, R. & Khurana, B., Ch. 18. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Metzger, W. (1932) Versuch einer gemeinsamen Theorie der Phänomene Fröhlichs und Hazelhoffs und Kritik ihrer Verfahren zur Messung der Empfindungszeit. Psychologische Forschung 16:176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, G., Taylor, S., Fisher, C., Harris, R. & Berry, M. J. 2nd. (2007b) Synchronized firing among retinal ganglion cells signals motion reversal. Neuron 55(6):958–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van de Grind, W. (2002) Physical, neural, and mental timing. Consciousness and Cognition 11(2):241–64; discussion 308–13.Google Scholar
van de Grind, W. A. (2006) Representing times of the past, present and future in the brain. In: Timing the future. A case for time-based prospective memory, ed. Glicksohn, J. & Myslobodski, M. S.. World Scientific Publishing Company.Google Scholar