Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-sd5qd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T17:58:40.918Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Naturally nested, but why dual process?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2007

Ben Newell  and
Brett Hayes
Ben Newell
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia. ben.newell@unsw.edu.aub.hayes@unsw.edu.auhttp://www2.psy.unsw.edu.au/Users/BNewell
Brett Hayes
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia. ben.newell@unsw.edu.aub.hayes@unsw.edu.auhttp://www2.psy.unsw.edu.au/Users/BNewell
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The article by Barbey & Sloman (B&S) provides a valuable framework for integrating research on base-rate neglect and respect. The theoretical arguments and data supporting the nested set model are persuasive. But we found the dual-process account to be under-specified and less compelling. Our concerns are based on (a) inconsistencies within the literature cited by B&S, and (b) studies of base-rate neglect in categorization.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 2007 , pp. 276 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brase, G. L., Fiddick, L. & Harries, C. (2006) Participant recruitment methods and statistical reasoning performance. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 59:965–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gluck, M. A. & Bower, G. H. (1988) From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117:227–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruschke, J. K. (1996) Base rates in category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 22:3–26.Google Scholar
Medin, D. L. & Edelson, S. M. (1988) Problem structure and the use of base-rate information from experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117:68–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newstead, S. E. (1989) Interpretational errors in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language 28:78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar