Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 35
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Bob, Petr Pec, Ondrej Mishara, Aaron L. Touskova, Tereza and Lysaker, Paul H. 2016. Conscious brain, metacognition and schizophrenia. International Journal of Psychophysiology, Vol. 105, p. 1.

    Thill, Serge and Twomey, Katherine E. 2016. What's on the Inside Counts: A Grounded Account of Concept Acquisition and Development. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,

    van der Velde, Frank 2016. Concepts and Relations in Neurally Inspired In Situ Concept-Based Computing. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, Vol. 10,

    Dehaene, Stanislas Meyniel, Florent Wacongne, Catherine Wang, Liping and Pallier, Christophe 2015. The Neural Representation of Sequences: From Transition Probabilities to Algebraic Patterns and Linguistic Trees. Neuron, Vol. 88, Issue. 1, p. 2.

    van der Velde, Frank 2015. Computation and dissipative dynamical systems in neural networks for classification. Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 64, p. 44.

    van der Velde, Frank 2015. Communication, concepts and grounding. Neural Networks, Vol. 62, p. 112.

    Goertzel, Ben 2014. 2014 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). p. 2587.

    Hammer, Barbara 2014. Academic Press Library in Signal Processing: Volume 1 - Signal Processing Theory and Machine Learning.

    Gong, Tao and Shuai, Lan 2013. Computer simulation as a scientific approach in evolutionary linguistics. Language Sciences, Vol. 40, p. 12.

    Pinkas, Gadi Lima, Priscila and Cohen, Shimon 2013. Representing, binding, retrieving and unifying relational knowledge using pools of neural binders. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, Vol. 6, p. 87.

    Rachkovskij, Dmitri A. Kussul, Ernst M. and Baidyk, Tatiana N. 2013. Building a world model with structure-sensitive sparse binary distributed representations. Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, Vol. 3, p. 64.

    Reggia, James A. 2013. The rise of machine consciousness: Studying consciousness with computational models. Neural Networks, Vol. 44, p. 112.

    de Kamps, Marc 2012. Towards truly human-level intelligence in artificial applications. Cognitive Systems Research, Vol. 14, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Takac, Martin Benuskova, Lubica and Knott, Alistair 2012. Mapping sensorimotor sequences to word sequences: A connectionist model of language acquisition and sentence generation. Cognition, Vol. 125, Issue. 2, p. 288.

    Braze, David Mencl, W. Einar Tabor, Whitney Pugh, Kenneth R. Todd Constable, R. Fulbright, Robert K. Magnuson, James S. Van Dyke, Julie A. and Shankweiler, Donald P. 2011. Unification of sentence processing via ear and eye: An fMRI study. Cortex, Vol. 47, Issue. 4, p. 416.

    Cavanagh, Patrick 2011. Visual cognition. Vision Research, Vol. 51, Issue. 13, p. 1538.

    Starzyk, Janusz A. 2011. The 2011 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. p. 495.

    Stewart, Terrence C. Tang, Yichuan and Eliasmith, Chris 2011. A biologically realistic cleanup memory: Autoassociation in spiking neurons. Cognitive Systems Research, Vol. 12, Issue. 2, p. 84.

    van der Velde, Frank and de Kamps, Marc 2011. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL). p. 1.

    Kukleta, M. Bob, P. Brázdil, M. Roman, R. and Rektor, I. 2010. The level of frontal-temporal beta-2 band EEG synchronization distinguishes anterior cingulate cortex from other frontal regions. Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 19, Issue. 4, p. 879.


Neural blackboard architectures of combinatorial structures in cognition

  • Frank van der Velde (a1) and Marc de Kamps (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2006

Human cognition is unique in the way in which it relies on combinatorial (or compositional) structures. Language provides ample evidence for the existence of combinatorial structures, but they can also be found in visual cognition. To understand the neural basis of human cognition, it is therefore essential to understand how combinatorial structures can be instantiated in neural terms. In his recent book on the foundations of language, Jackendoff described four fundamental problems for a neural instantiation of combinatorial structures: the massiveness of the binding problem, the problem of 2, the problem of variables, and the transformation of combinatorial structures from working memory to long-term memory. This paper aims to show that these problems can be solved by means of neural “blackboard” architectures. For this purpose, a neural blackboard architecture for sentence structure is presented. In this architecture, neural structures that encode for words are temporarily bound in a manner that preserves the structure of the sentence. It is shown that the architecture solves the four problems presented by Jackendoff. The ability of the architecture to instantiate sentence structures is illustrated with examples of sentence complexity observed in human language performance. Similarities exist between the architecture for sentence structure and blackboard architectures for combinatorial structures in visual cognition, derived from the structure of the visual cortex. These architectures are briefly discussed, together with an example of a combinatorial structure in which the blackboard architectures for language and vision are combined. In this way, the architecture for language is grounded in perception. Perspectives and potential developments of the architectures are discussed.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *