Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 11
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Caplan, David Michaud, Jennifer and Hufford, Rebecca 2015. Mechanisms underlying syntactic comprehension deficits in vascular aphasia: new evidence from self-paced listening. Cognitive Neuropsychology, Vol. 32, Issue. 5, p. 283.


    Leiken, Kimberly and Pylkkänen, Liina 2014. MEG evidence that the LIFG effect of object extraction requires similarity-based interference. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, Vol. 29, Issue. 3, p. 381.


    Choi, So-Young 2012. The Effects of Increased Processing Demands on the Sentence Comprehension of Korean-speaking Adults with Aphasia. Journal of the Korean society of speech sciences, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 127.


    Gutman, Roee DeDe, Gayle Caplan, David and Liu, Jun S. 2011. Rasch Model and Its Extensions for Analysis of Aphasic Deficits in Syntactic Comprehension. Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 106, Issue. 496, p. 1304.


    Gutman, Roee DeDe, Gayle Michaud, Jennifer Liu, Jun S. and Caplan, David 2010. Rasch models of aphasic performance on syntactic comprehension tests. Cognitive Neuropsychology, Vol. 27, Issue. 3, p. 230.


    Eisenbeiß, Sonja 2009. Generative approaches to language learning. Linguistics, Vol. 47, Issue. 2,


    Caplan, David Stanczak, Louise and Waters, Gloria 2008. Syntactic and Thematic Constraint Effects on Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent Signal Correlates of Comprehension of Relative Clauses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 20, Issue. 4, p. 643.


    Caplan, David 2007. Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Syntactic Processing in Sentence Comprehension: A Critical Selective Review. Language and Linguistics Compass, Vol. 1, Issue. 1-2, p. 32.


    DeDe, Gayle and Caplan, David 2006. Factor analysis of aphasic syntactic comprehension disorders. Aphasiology, Vol. 20, Issue. 2-4, p. 123.


    Caplan, David Waters, Gloria and Alpert, Nathaniel 2003. Effects of age and speed of processing on rCBF correlates of syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 112.


    Caplan, David Vijayan, Sujith Kuperberg, Gina West, Caroline Waters, Gloria Greve, Doug and Dale, Anders M. 2002. Vascular responses to syntactic processing: Event-related fMRI study of relative clauses. Human Brain Mapping, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 26.


    ×

No evidence for traces in sentence comprehension

  • Martin J. Pickering (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00502398
  • Published online: 01 February 2000
Abstract

Grodzinsky claims that “normal language users demonstrate trace-antecedent relations in real-time tasks.” However, the cited evidence is equally compatible with a traceless account of processing. Moreover, Pickering and Barry (1991) and Traxler and Pickering (1996) have demonstrated that the processor does not wait until the purported trace location before forming the dependency. Grodzinsky's claims about Broca's area should be interpreted in terms of a transformation-free account.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×