Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7cz98 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-22T20:56:22.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A note on methodology in linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Robert Freidin
Affiliation:
Program in Linguistics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544-5264. freidin@princeton.edu

Abstract

Evans & Levinson's (E&L's) critique of Universal Grammar fails because their methodology is flawed, as illustrated in their discussion of the Subjacency Condition. The lack of explicit analysis leads the authors to a false conclusion that is refuted by work published in this journal twenty years ago. They miss the point that unanalyzed data cannot disprove grammatical hypotheses.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable