Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language

  • Morten H. Christiansen (a1) (a2) and Nick Chater (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

Memory is fleeting. New material rapidly obliterates previous material. How, then, can the brain deal successfully with the continual deluge of linguistic input? We argue that, to deal with this “Now-or-Never” bottleneck, the brain must compress and recode linguistic input as rapidly as possible. This observation has strong implications for the nature of language processing: (1) the language system must “eagerly” recode and compress linguistic input; (2) as the bottleneck recurs at each new representational level, the language system must build a multilevel linguistic representation; and (3) the language system must deploy all available information predictively to ensure that local linguistic ambiguities are dealt with “Right-First-Time”; once the original input is lost, there is no way for the language system to recover. This is “Chunk-and-Pass” processing. Similarly, language learning must also occur in the here and now, which implies that language acquisition is learning to process, rather than inducing, a grammar. Moreover, this perspective provides a cognitive foundation for grammaticalization and other aspects of language change. Chunk-and-Pass processing also helps explain a variety of core properties of language, including its multilevel representational structure and duality of patterning. This approach promises to create a direct relationship between psycholinguistics and linguistic theory. More generally, we outline a framework within which to integrate often disconnected inquiries into language processing, language acquisition, and language change and evolution.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The Now-or-Never bottleneck: A fundamental constraint on language
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Allopenna P. D., Magnuson J. S. & Tanenhaus M. K. (1998) Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 38:419–39.
Altmann G. T. M. (2002) Learning and development in neural networks: The importance of prior experience. Cognition 85:4350.
Altmann G. T. M. (2004) Language-mediated eye movements in the absence of a visual world: The “blank screen paradigm.Cognition 93:7987.
Altmann G. T. M. & Kamide Y. (1999) Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73:247–64.
Altmann G. T. M. & Kamide Y. (2009) Discourse-mediation of the mapping between language and the visual world: Eye movements and mental representation. Cognition 111:5571.
Altmann G. T. M. & Mirkovic J. (2009) Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science 33:583609.
Altmann G. T. M. & Steedman M. J. (1988) Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition 30:191–38.
Anderson J. R. (1990) The adaptive character of thought. Erlbaum.
Arbib M. A. (2005) From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28:105–24.
Arnon I. & Christiansen M. H. (submitted) The role of multiword building blocks in explaining L1-L2 differences
Arnon I. & Clark E. V. (2011) Why brush your teeth is better than teeth – Children's word production is facilitated in familiar sentence-frames. Language Learning and Development 7:107–29.
Arnon I. & Cohen Priva U. (2013) More than words: The effect of multi-word frequency and constituency on phonetic duration. Language and Speech 56:349–73.
Arnon I. & Snider N. (2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62:6782.
Austin J. L. (1962) How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
Baker M. (2001) The atoms of language. Basic Books.
Bannard C. & Matthews D. (2008) Stored word sequences in language learning. Psychological Science 19:241–48.
Bar M. (2004) Visual objects in context. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5:617–29.
Bar M. (2007) The proactive brain: Using analogies and associations to generate predictions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11:280–89.
Baumann T. & Schlangen D. (2012) INPRO_iSS: A component for just-in-time incremental speech synthesis. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2012 System Demonstrations, pp. 103–108. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Beckner C., Blythe R., Bybee J., Christiansen M. H., Croft W., Ellis N., Holland J., Ke J., Larsen- Freeman D. & Schoenemann T. (2009) Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning 59(Suppl. 1):127.
Bellugi U. & Fisher S. (1972) A comparison of sign language and spoken language. Cognition 1:173200.
Berwick R. C. (1985) The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. MIT Press.
Berwick R. C., Friederici A. D., Chomsky N. & Bolhuis J. J. (2013) Evolution, brain, and the nature of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17:91100.
Berwick R. C. & Weinberg A. S. (1984) The grammatical basis of linguistic performance. MIT Press.
Bever T. (1970) The cognitive basis for linguistic structures. In: Cognition and the development of language, ed. Hayes J. R., pp. 279362. Wiley.
Bickerton D. (1984) The language bioprogram hypothesis. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 7:173221.
Bock J. K. (1982) Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review 89:147.
Bock J. K. (1986) Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12:575–86.
Bock J. K. & Loebell H. (1990) Framing sentences. Cognition 35:139.
Bock J. K. & Miller C. A. (1991) Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology 23:4593.
Bod R. (2009) From exemplar to grammar: A probabilistic analogy–based model of language learning. Cognitive Science 33:752–93.
Boeckx C. & Leivada E. (2013) Entangled parametric hierarchies: Problems for an overspecified universal grammar. PLOS ONE 8(9):e72357.
Borovsky A., Elman J. L. & Fernald A. (2012) Knowing a lot for one's age: Vocabulary skill and not age is associated with anticipatory incremental sentence interpretation in children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 112:417–36.
Boyd R. & Richerson P. J. (1987) The evolution of ethnic markers. Cultural Anthropology 2:6579.
Branigan H., Pickering M. & Cleland A. (2000) Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition 75:1325.
Bregman A. S. (1990) Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press.
Broadbent D. (1958) Perception and communication. Pergamon Press.
Brown G. D. A., Neath I. & Chater N. (2007) A temporal ratio model of memory. Psychological Review 114:539–76.
Brown-Schmidt S. & Konopka A. E. (2011) Experimental approaches to referential domains and the on-line processing of referring expressions in unscripted conversation. Information 2:302–26.
Brown-Schmidt S. & Konopka A. (2015) Processes of incremental message planning during conversation. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 22:833–43.
Brown-Schmidt S. & Tanenhaus M. K. (2008) Real-time investigation of referential domains in unscripted conversation: A targeted language game approach. Cognitive Science 32:643–84.
Bybee J. (2002) Word frequency and context of use in the lexical diffusion of phonetically conditioned sound change. Language Variation and Change 14:261–90.
Bybee J. (2006) From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition. Language 82:711–33.
Bybee J. (2007) Frequency of use and the organization of language. Oxford University Press.
Bybee J. (2009) Language universals and usage-based theory. In: Language universals, ed. Christiansen M. H., Collins C. & Edelman S., pp. 1739. Oxford University Press.
Bybee J. & Hopper P., eds. (2001) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. John Benjamins.
Bybee J. & McClelland J. L. (2005) Alternatives to the combinatorial paradigm of linguistic theory based on general principles of human cognition. The Linguistic Review 22:381410.
Bybee J., Perkins R. D. & Pagliuca W. (1994) The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. University of Chicago Press.
Bybee J. & Scheibman J. (1999) The effect of usage on degrees of constituency: The reduction of don't in English. Linguistics 37:575–96.
Bybee J. L. & Slobin D. I. (1982) Rules and schemas in the development and use of the English past tense. Language 58:265–89.
Campbell L. (2000) What's wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23:113–61.
Cann R. & Kempson R. (2008) Production pressures, syntactic change and the emergence of clitic pronouns. In: Language in flux: Dialogue coordination, language variation, change and evolution, ed. Cooper R. & Kempson R., pp. 221–63. College Publications.
Cann R., Kempson R. & Wedgwood D. (2012) Representationalism and linguistic knowledge. In: Philosophy of linguistics, ed. Kempson R., Fernando T. & Asher N., pp. 357402. Elsevier.
Carr M. F., Jadhav S. P. & Frank L. M. (2011) Hippocampal replay in the awake state: A potential substrate for memory consolidation and retrieval. Nature Neuroscience 14:147–53.
Carstairs-McCarthy A. (1992) Current morphology. Routledge.
Chang F., Dell G. S. & Bock K. (2006) Becoming syntactic. Psychological Review 113:234–72.
Chater N., Crocker M. J. & Pickering M. J. (1998) The rational analysis of inquiry: The case of parsing. In: Rational models of cognition, ed. Oaksford M. & Chater N., pp. 441–68. Oxford University Press.
Chater N., McCauley S. M. & Christiansen M. H. (2106) Language as skill: Intertwining comprehension and production. Journal of Memory and Language 89:244–54.
Chater N., Tenenbaum J. B. & Yuille A. (2006) Probabilistic models of cognition: Conceptual foundations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10:287–91.
Cherry E. C. (1953) Some experiments on the recognition of speech with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25:975–79.
Chomsky N. (1957) Syntactic structures. Mouton.
Chomsky N. (1965) Aspects of the theory of syntax. MIT Press.
Chomsky N. (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Mouton de Gruyter.
Christiansen M. H. & Chater N. (1999) Toward a connectionist model of recursion in human linguistic performance. Cognitive Science 23:157205.
Christiansen M. H. & Chater N. (2008) Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 31(05):489–58.
Christiansen M. H. & MacDonald M. C. (2009) A usage-based approach to recursion in sentence processing. Language Learning 59(Suppl. 1):126–61.
Clark A. (2013) Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36(3):181253.
Clark H. H. (1996) Using language. Cambridge University Press.
Clark J., Yallop C. & Fletcher J. (2007) An introduction to phonetics and phonology, third edition. Wiley-Blackwell.
Clément S., Demany L. & Semal C. (1999) Memory for pitch versus memory for loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106:2805–11.
Coltheart M. (1980) Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics 27:183228.
Cooper R. P. & Shallice T. (2006) Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behavior. Psychological Review 113:887916.
Cowan N. (2000) The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:87185.
Crick F. & Mitchison G. (1983) The function of dream sleep. Nature 304:111–14.
Croft W. (2001) Radical construction grammar. Oxford University Press.
Crowder R. G. & Neath I. (1991) The microscope metaphor in human memory. In: Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honour of Bennet B. Murdock, Jr., ed. Hockley W. E. & Lewandowsky S.. Erlbaum.
Culicover P. W. (1999) Syntactic nuts: Hard cases, syntactic theory, and language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Culicover P. W. (2013) The role of linear order in the computation of referential dependencies. Lingua 136:125–44.
Cutler A., ed. (1982) Slips of the tongue and language production. De Gruyter Mouton.
Dahan D. (2010) The time course of interpretation in speech comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19:121–26.
de Vries M. H., Christiansen M. H. & Petersson K. M. (2011) Learning recursion: Multiple nested and crossed dependencies. Biolinguistics 5:1035.
Dediu D., Cysouw M., Levinson S. C., Baronchelli A., Christiansen M. H., Croft W., Evans N., Garrod S., Gray R., Kandler A. & Lieven E. (2013) Cultural evolution of language. In: Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language and religion, ed. Richerson P. J. & Christiansen M. H., pp. 303–32. MIT Press.
Dehaene-Lambertz G., Dehaene S., Anton J. L., Campagne A., Ciuciu P., Dehaene G. P., Denghien I., Jobert A., Lebihan D., Sigman M., Pallier C. & Poline J.-P. (2006a) Functional segregation of cortical language areas by sentence repetition. Human Brain Mapping 27:360–71.
Dehaene-Lambertz G., Hertz-Pannier L., Dubois J., Meriaux S., Roche A., Sigman M. & Dehaene S. (2006b) Functional organization of perisylvian activation during presentation of sentences in preverbal infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103:14240–45.
Dell G. S., Burger L. K. & Svec W. R. (1997) Language production and serial order: A functional analysis and a model. Psychological Review 104:123–47.
Dell G. S. & Chang F. (2014) The P-chain: Relating sentence production and its disorders to comprehension and acquisition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369(1634):20120394.
DeLong K. A., Urbach T. P. & Kutas M. (2005) Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience 8:1117–21.
Dikker S., Rabagliati H., Farmer T. A. & Pylkkänen L. (2010) Early occipital sensitivity to syntactic category is based on form typicality. Psychological Science 21:629–34.
Dunn M., Greenhill S. J., Levinson S. C. & Gray R. D. (2011) Evolved structure of language shows lineage-specific trends in word-order universals. Nature 473:7982.
Durrant P. (2013) Formulaicity in an agglutinating language: The case of Turkish. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 9:138.
Elliott L. L. (1962) Backward and forward masking of probe tones of different frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 34:1116–17.
Ellis N. C. (2002) Frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24:143–88.
Elman J. L. (1990) Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science 14(2):179211.
Enfield N. J. (2013) Relationship thinking: Enchrony, agency, and human sociality. Oxford University Press.
Erickson T. A. & Matteson M. E. (1981) From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20:540–52.
Ericsson K. A., Chase W. G. & Faloon S. (1980) Acquisition of a memory skill. Science 208:1181–82.
Evans N. & Levinson S. (2009) The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32:429–92.
Farmer T. A., Christiansen M. H. & Monaghan P. (2006) Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103:12203–208.
Farmer T. A., Monaghan P., Misyak J. B. & Christiansen M. H. (2011) Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: A reply to Staub et al. (2009) Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37:1318–25.
Federmeier K. D. (2007) Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology 44:491505.
Ferreira F., Bailey K. G. & Ferraro V. (2002) Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 11(1):1115.
Ferreira V. (2008) Ambiguity, accessibility, and a division of labor for communicative success. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 49:209–46.
Ferrer i Cancho R. (2004) The Euclidean distance between syntactically linked words. Physical Review E 70:056135.
Ferrer i Cancho R. & Liu H. (2014) The risks of mixing dependency lengths from sequences of different length. Glottotheory 5:143–55.
Fine A. B., Jaeger T. F., Farmer T. A. & Qian T. (2013) Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension. PLOS ONE 8(10):e77661.
Fiske S. T. & Taylor S. E. (1984) Social cognition. Addison-Wesley.
Fitneva S. A., Christiansen M. H. & Monaghan P. (2009) From sound to syntax: Phonological constraints on children's lexical categorization of new words. Journal of Child Language 36:967–97.
Flanagan J. R. & Wing A. M. (1997) The role of internal models in motor planning and control: Evidence from grip force adjustments during movements of hand-held loads. Journal of Neuroscience 17:1519–28.
Fleischman S. (1982) The future in thought and language: Diachronic evidence from Romance. Cambridge University Press.
Fodor J. D. (1998) Unambiguous triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 29:136.
Ford M., Bresnan J. W. & Kaplan R. M. (1982) A competence-based theory of syntactic closure. In: The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. Bresnan J. W., pp. 727–96. MIT Press.
Frank S. L., Bod R. & Christiansen M. H. (2012) How hierarchical is language use? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279:4522–31.
Frazier L. & Fodor J. D. (1978) The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition 6:291–25.
French R. M. (1999) Catastrophic forgetting in connectionist networks. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3:128–35.
Gahl S. & Garnsey S. M. (2004) Knowledge of grammar, knowledge of usage: Syntactic probabilities affect pronunciation variation. Language 80:748–75.
Gallace A., Tan H. Z. & Spence C. (2006) The failure to detect tactile change: A tactile analogue of visual change blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13:300303.
Gibson E. (1998) Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68:176.
Gibson E., Bergen L. & Piantadosi S. T. (2013) Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:8051–56.
Gibson E. & Wexler K. (1994) Triggers. Linguistic Inquiry 25:407–54.
Gildea D. & Temperley D. (2010) Do grammars minimize dependency length? Cognitive Science 34:286310.
Givón T. (1971) Historical syntax and synchronic morphology: An archaeologist's field trip. Chicago Linguistic Society 7:394415.
Givón T. (1979) On understanding grammar. Academic Press.
Gobet F., Lane P. C. R., Croker S., Cheng P. C. H., Jones G., Oliver I. & Pine J. M. (2001) Chunking mechanisms in human learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5:236–43.
Gold E. M. (1967) Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10:447–74.
Goldberg A. (2006) Constructions at work. Oxford University Press.
Goldinger S. D. (1998) Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105:251–79.
Golinkoff R. M., Hirsh-Pasek K., Bloom L., Smith L., Woodward A., Akhtar N., Tomasello M. & Hollich G., eds. (2000) Becoming a word learner: A debate on lexical acquisition. Oxford University Press.
Gorrell P. (1995) Syntax and parsing. Cambridge University Press.
Graybiel A. M. (1998) The basal ganglia and chunking of action repertoires. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 70:119–36.
Grice H. P. (1967) Logic and conversation. James William Lectures. Manuscript, Harvard University.
Griffiths T. L. & Tenenbaum J. B. (2009) Theory-based causal induction. Psychological Review 116:661716.
Gurevich O., Johnson M. A. & Goldberg A. E. (2010) Incidental verbatim memory for language. Language and Cognition 2:4578.
Haber R. N. (1983) The impending demise of the icon: The role of iconic processes in information processing theories of perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 6:111.
Hagoort P. (2009) Reflections on the neurobiology of syntax. In: Biological foundations and origin of syntax. Strüngmann Forum Reports, volume 3, ed. Bickerton D. & Szathmáry E., pp. 279–96. MIT Press.
Hahn U. & Nakisa R. C. (2000) German inflection: Single route or dual route? Cognitive Psychology 41:313–60.
Hale J. (2001) A probabilistic Earley parser as a psycholinguistic model. Proceedings of the Second Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Pittsburgh, PA, June 2–7, 2001, pp. 159–66. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Hale J. (2006) Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science 30:609–42.
Haspelmath M. (1999) Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37:1043–68.
Hasson U., Yang E., Vallines I., Heeger D. J. & Rubin N. (2008) A hierarchy of temporal receptive windows in human cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience 28(10):2539–50.
Hauser M. D., Chomsky N. & Fitch W. T. (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298:1569–79.
Hawkins J. A. (2004) Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford University Press.
Hawkins J. A. (2009) Language universals and the performance-grammar correspondence hypothesis. In: Language universals, ed. Christiansen M. H., Collins C. & Edelman S., pp. 5478. Oxford University Press.
Hay J. (2000) Morphological adjacency constraints: A synthesis. Proceedings of Student Conference in Linguistics 9. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 36:1729.
Heathcote A., Brown S. & Mewhort D. J. K. (2000) The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 7:185207.
Heider P., Dery J. & Roland D. (2014) The processing of it object relative clauses: Evidence against a fine-grained frequency account. Journal of Memory and Language 75:5876.
Heine B. & Kuteva T. (2002) World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
Heine B. & Kuteva T. (2007) The genesis of grammar. Oxford University Press.
Hinojosa J. A., Moreno E. M., Casado P., Munõz F. & Pozo M. A. (2005) Syntactic expectancy: An event-related potentials study. Neuroscience Letters 378:3439.
Hintzman D. L. (1988) Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review 95:528–51.
Hinton G. E. & Sejnowski T. J. (1986) Learning and relearning in Boltzmann machines . In: Graphical models: Foundations of neural computation, ed. Irwin M. J. & Sejnowski T. J., pp. 4576. MIT Press.
Hoey M. (2005) Lexical priming: A new theory of words and language. Psychology Press.
Hofmeister P. & Sag I. A. (2010) Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86:366415.
Honey C. J., Thesen T., Donner T. H., Silbert L. J., Carlson C. E., Devinsky O., Doyle W. K., Rubin N., Heeger D. J. & Hasson U. (2012) Slow cortical dynamics and the accumulation of information over long timescales. Neuron 76(2):423–34.
Hopper P. J. & Traugott E. C. (1993) Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
Hruschka D., Christiansen M. H., Blythe R. A., Croft W., Heggarty P., Mufwene S. S., Pierrehumbert J. H. & Poplack S. (2009) Building social cognitive models of language change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13:464–69.
Hsu A., Chater N. & Vitányi P. (2011) The probabilistic analysis of language acquisition: Theoretical, computational, and experimental analysis. Cognition 120:380–90.
Hudson Kam C. L. & Newport E. L. (2005) Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning and Development 1:151–95.
Hurford J. (1999) The evolution of language and languages. In: The evolution of culture, ed. Dunbar R., Knight C. & Power C., pp. 173–93. Edinburgh University Press.
Jackendoff R. (2007) A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research 1146:222.
Jacoby L. L., Baker J. G. & Brooks L. R. (1989) The priority of the specific: Episodic effects in picture identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15:275–81.
Jaeger T. (2010) Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology 61:2362.
Jaeger T. F. & Tily H. (2011) On language “utility”: Processing complexity and communicative efficiency. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2:323–35.
Jensen M. S., Yao R., Street W. N. & Simons D. J. (2011) Change blindness and inattentional blindness. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 2:529–46.
Johnson-Laird P. N. (1983) Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press.
Jolsvai H., McCauley S. M. & Christiansen M. H. (2013) Meaning overrides frequency in idiomatic and compositional multiword chunks. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, ,Berlin, Germany, July 31–August 3, 2013,, ed. Knauff M., Pauen M., Sebanz N. & Wachsmuth I., pp. 692–97. Cognitive Science Society.
Jones G. (2012) Why chunking should be considered as an explanation for developmental change before short-term memory capacity and processing speed. Frontiers in Psychology 3:167. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00167.
Jurafsky D. (1996) A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive Science 20:137–94.
Jurafsky D., Bell A., Gregory M. L. & Raymond W. D. (2001) Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In: Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, ed. Bybee J. L. & Hopper P., pp. 229–54. John Benjamins.
Jurafsky D., Martin J. H., Kehler A., Vander Linden K. & Ward N. (2000) Speech and language processing: An introduction to natural language processing, computational linguistics, and speech recognition. Prentice Hall.
Kamide Y. (2008) Anticipatory processes in sentence processing. Language and Linguistic Compass 2:647–70.
Kamin L. J. (1969) Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In: Punishment and aversive behavior, ed. Campbell B. A., Church R. M., pp. 279–96. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Karlsson F. (2007) Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics 43:365–92.
Kempson R., Meyer-Viol W. & Gabbay D. (2001) Dynamic syntax: The flow of language understanding. Blackwell.
Kimball J. (1973) Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition 2:1547.
Kirby S., Cornish H. & Smith K. (2008) Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:10681–85.
Kluender R. & Kutas M. (1993) Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language & Cognitive Processes 8:573633.
Konopka A. E. (2012) Planning ahead: How recent experience with structures and words changes the scope of linguistic planning. Journal of Memory and Language 66:143–62.
Kraljic T. & Brennan S. (2005) Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the addressee? Cognitive Psychology 50:194231.
Kutas M., Federmeier K. D. & Urbach T. P. (2014) The “negatives” and “positives” of prediction in language. In: The Cognitive Neurosciences V, ed. Gazzaniga M. S. & Mangun G. R., pp. 649–56. MIT Press.
Lashley K. S. (1951) The problem of serial order in behavior. In: Cerebral mechanisms in behavior: The Hixon Symposium, ed. Jeffress L. A., pp. 112–46. Wiley.
Lerdahl F. & Jackendoff R. (1983) A generative theory of tonal music. MIT Press.
Lerner Y., Honey C. J., Silbert L. J. & Hasson U. (2011) Topographic mapping of a hierarchy of temporal receptive windows using a narrated story. Journal of Neuroscience 31:2906–15.
Levelt W. J. M. (2001) Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98:13464–71.
Levinson S. C. (2000) Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press.
Levinson S. C. (2013) Recursion in pragmatics. Language 89:149–62.
Levy R. (2008) Expectation-based syntactic comprehension. Cognition 106:1126–77.
Levy R., Bicknell K., Slattery T. & Rayner K. (2009) Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:21086–90.
Lightfoot D. (1989) The child's trigger experience: Degree-0 learnability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:321–34.
Logan G. D. (1988) Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review 95:492527.
Louwerse M. M., Dale R., Bard E. G. & Jeuniaux P. (2012) Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science 36:1404–26.
Lupyan G. & Christiansen M. H. (2002) Case, word order, and language learnability: Insights from connectionist modeling. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Fairfax, VA, August 2002, pp. 596–601, ed. Gray W. D. & Schunn C.. Erlbaum.
MacDonald M. C. (1994) Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution. Language and Cognitive Processes 9:157201.
MacDonald M. C. (2013) How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology 4:226. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00226.
MacDonald M. C. & Christiansen M. H. (2002) Reassessing working memory: A comment on Just & Carpenter (1992) and Waters & Caplan (1996). Psychological Review 109:3554.
MacDonald M. C., Pearlmutter M. & Seidenberg M. (1994) The lexical nature of ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 101:676703.
MacKay D. J. (2003) Information theory, inference and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press.
Magyari L. & de Ruiter J. P. (2012) Prediction of turn-ends based on anticipation of upcoming words. Frontiers in Psychology 3:376. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00376
Mani N. & Huettig F. (2012) Prediction during language processing is a piece of cake – but only for skilled producers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38:843–47.
Manning C. D. & Schütze H. (1999) Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT press.
Marchman V. A. & Fernald A. (2008) Speed of word recognition and vocabulary knowledge in infancy predict cognitive and language outcomes in later childhood. Developmental Science 11:F9–16.
Marcus M. P. (1980) Theory of syntactic recognition for natural languages. MIT Press.
Marr D. (1976) Early processing of visual information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B: Biological Sciences 275:483519.
Marr D. (1982) Vision. W. H. Freeman.
Marslen-Wilson W. D. (1975) Sentence perception as an interactive parallel process. Science 189:226–28.
Marslen-Wilson W. D., Tyler L. K. & Koster C. (1993) Integrative processes in utterance resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 32:647–66.
Martin R. C. & He T. (2004) Semantic STM and its role in sentence processing: A replication. Brain and Language 89:7682.
Martin R. C., Shelton J. R. & Yaffee L. S. (1994) Language processing and working memory: Neuropsychological evidence for separate phonological and semantic capacities. Journal of Memory and Language 33:83111.
McCauley S. M. & Christiansen M. H. (2011) Learning simple statistics for language comprehension and production: The CAPPUCCINO model. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA, July 2011. pp. 619–24, ed. Carlson L. A., Hölscher C. & Shipley T. F.. Cognitive Science Society.
McCauley S. M. & Christiansen M. H. (2014b) Reappraising lexical specificity in children's early syntactic combinations. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. pp. 1000–1005. ed. Bello P., Guarini M., McShane M., & Scassellati B.. Cognitive Science Society.
McCloskey M. & Cohen N. J. (1989) Catastrophic interference in connectionist networks: The sequential learning problem. Psychology of Learning and Motivation 24:109–65.
Mermillod M., Bugaïska A. & Bonin P. (2013) The stability-plasticity dilemma: Investigating the continuum from catastrophic forgetting to age-limited learning effects. Frontiers in Psychology 4:504. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00504.
Meyer D. E. & Schvaneveldt R. W. (1971) Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90:227–34.
Meyer A. S. (1996) Lexical access in phrase and sentence production: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language 35:477–96.
Miller G. A. (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2):8197.
Miller G. A., Galanter E. & Pribram K. H. (1960) Plans and the structure of behavior. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Miller G. A. & Taylor W. G. (1948) The perception of repeated bursts of noise. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 20:171–82.
Misyak J. B. & Christiansen M. H. (2010) When “more” in statistical learning means “less” in language: Individual differences in predictive processing of adjacent dependencies. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, Portland, OR, August 11–14, 2010, ed. Catrambone R. & Ohlsson S., pp. 2686–91. Cognitive Science Society.
Monaghan P. & Christiansen M. H. (2008) Integration of multiple probabilistic cues in syntax acquisition. In: Trends in corpus research: Finding structure in data (TILAR Series), ed. Behrens H., pp. 139–63. John Benjamins.
Morgan J. L. & Demuth K. (1996) Signal to syntax: Bootstrapping from speech to grammar in early acquisition. Erlbaum.
Morrill G. (2010) Categorial grammar: Logical syntax, semantics, and processing. Oxford University Press.
Mufwene S. (2008) Language evolution: Contact, competition and change. Continuum International Publishing Group.
Murdock B. B. Jr., (1968) Serial order effects in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monograph Supplement 115.
Nadig A. S. & Sedivy J. C. (2002) Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychological Science 13:329–36.
Navon D. & Miller J. O. (2002) Queuing or sharing? A critical evaluation of the single-bottleneck notion. Cognitive Psychology 44:193251.
Neal R. M. & Hinton G. E. (1998) A view of the EM algorithm that justifies incremental, sparse, and other variants. In: Learning in graphical models, ed. Jordan M. I., pp. 355–68. Kluwer.
Nevins A. (2010) Locality in vowel harmony. MIT Press.
Newell A. & Rosenbloom P. S. (1981) Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In: Cognitive skills and their acquisition, ed. Anderson J. R., pp. 155. Erlbaum.
Nicol J. L., Forster K. I. & Veres C. (1997) Subject-verb agreement processes in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 36:569–87.
Niyogi P. & Berwick R. C. (1996) A language learning model for finite parameter spaces. Cognition 61:161–93.
Norman D. A. & Shallice T. (1986) Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In: Consciousness and self-regulation, ed. Davidson R. J., Schwartz G. E. & Shapiro D., pp. 118. Plenum Press.
Nosofsky R. M. (1986) Attention, similarity, and the identification–categorization relationship. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 115:39.
Noveck I. A. & Reboul A. (2008) Experimental pragmatics: A Gricean turn in the study of language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12:425–31.
Nygaard L. C., Sommers M. S. & Pisoni D. B. (1994) Speech perception as a talker-contingent process. Psychological Science 5:4246.
O'Grady W. (2005) Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. Erlbaum.
O'Grady W. (2013) The illusion of language acquisition. Approaches to Bilingualism 3:253–85.
O'Grady W. (2015a) Anaphora and the case for emergentism. In: The handbook of language emergence, ed. MacWhinney B. & O'Grady W., pp. 100–22. Wiley-Blackwell.
Oaksford M. & Chater N., eds. (1998) Rational models of cognition. Oxford University Press.
Oaksford M. & Chater N. (2007) Bayesian rationality. Oxford University Press.
Ohno T. & Mito S. (1988) Just-in-time for today and tomorrow. Productivity Press.
Orr D. B., Friedman H. L. & Williams J. C. C. (1965) Trainability of listening comprehension of speeded discourse. Journal of Educational Psychology 56:148–56.
Orwin M., Howes C. & Kempson R. (2013) Language, music and interaction. College Publications.
Padó U., Crocker M. W. & Keller F. (2009) A probabilistic model of semantic plausibility in sentence processing. Cognitive Science 33:794838.
Pani J. R. (2000) Cognitive description and change blindness. Visual Cognition 7:107–26.
Pashler H. (1988) Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception and Psychophysics 44:369–78.
Pavani F. & Turatto M. (2008) Change perception in complex auditory scenes. Perception and Psychophysics 70:619–29.
Pearlmutter N. J., Garnsey S. M. & Bock K. (1999) Agreement processes in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language 41:427–56.
Pellegrino F., Coupé C. & Marsico E. (2011) A cross-language perspective on speech information rate. Language 87:539–58.
Pereira P. & Schabes Y. (1992) Inside–outside reestimation from partially bracketed corpora. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, Newark, DE, June 28–July 2, 1992, pp. 128–35, ed. Thompson H. S.. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Phillips B. S. (2006) Word frequency and lexical diffusion. Palgrave Macmillan.
Phillips C. (1996) Merge right: An approach to constituency conflicts. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, volume 15, Los Angeles, CA, March 1994, pp. 381–95, ed. Camacho J., Choueiri L. & Watanabe M.. University of Chicago Press.
Phillips C. (2003) Linear order and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 34:3790.
Piantadosi S., Tily H. & Gibson E. (2011) Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108:3526–29.
Piantadosi S., Tily H. & Gibson E. (2012) The communicative function of ambiguity in language. Cognition 122:280–91.
Pickering M. J. & Branigan H. P. (1998) The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 39:633–51.
Pickering M. J. & Garrod S. (2004) Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:169226.
Pickering M. J. & Garrod S. (2007) Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11:105–10.
Pickering M. J. & Garrod S. (2013a) An integrated theory of language production and comprehension. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36: 329–47.
Pierrehumbert J. (2002) Word-specific phonetics. Laboratory Phonology VII. Mouton de Gruyter.
Pine J. M., Freudenthal D., Krajewski G. & Gobet F. (2013) Do young children have adult-like syntactic categories? Zipf's law and the case of the determiner. Cognition 127:345–60.
Pinker S. (1984) Language learnability and language development. Harvard University Press.
Pinker S. (1994) The language instinct: How the mind creates language. William Morrow.
Pinker S. & Bloom P. (1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13:707–27.
Pinker S. & Prince A. (1988) On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28:73193.
Potter M. C. & Lombardi L. (1998) Syntactic priming in immediate recall of sentences. Journal of Memory and Language 38:265–82.
Poulet J. F. A. & Hedwig B. (2006) New insights into corollary discharges mediated by identified neural pathways. Trends in Neurosciences 30:1421.
Pulman S. G. (1985) A parser that doesn't. Proceedings of the Second European Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Geneva, Switzerland, March 1985, pp. 128–35, Association for Computational Linguistics.
Ratcliff R. (1990) Connectionist models of recognition memory: Constraints imposed by learning and forgetting functions. Psychological Review 97:285308.
Reali F. & Christiansen M. H. (2007a) Processing of relative clauses is made easier by frequency of occurrence. Journal of Memory and Language 57:123.
Reali F. & Christiansen M. H. (2007b) Word-chunk frequencies affect the processing of pronominal object-relative clauses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 60:161–70.
Redington M., Chater N. & Finch S. (1998) Distributional information: A powerful cue for acquiring syntactic categories. Cognitive Science 22:425469.
Remez R. E., Fellowes J. M. & Rubin P. E. (1997) Talker identification based on phonetic information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23:651–66.
Remez R. E., Ferro D. F., Dubowski K. R., Meer J., Broder R. S. & Davids M. L. (2010) Is desynchrony tolerance adaptable in the perceptual organization of speech? Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics 72:2054–58.
Richerson P. J. & Christiansen M. H., eds. (2013) Cultural evolution: Society, technology, language and religion. MIT Press.
Roland D., Elman J. & Ferreira V. (2006) Why is that? Structural prediction and ambiguity resolution in a very large corpus of English sentences. Cognition 98:245–72.
Rumelhart D. E. & McClelland J. L. (1986) On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In: Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 2: Psychological and biological models, ed. McClelland J. L., Rumelhart D. E. & the PDP Research Group, pp. 216–71. MIT Press.
Rumelhart D. E., McClelland J. L. & the PDP Research Group (1986a) Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, volumes 1 and 2. MIT Press.
Saad D., ed. (1998) On-line learning in neural networks. Cambridge University Press.
Sagarra N. & Herschensohn J. (2010) The role of proficiency and working memory in gender and number processing in L1 and L2 Spanish. Lingua 120:2022–39.
Sahin N. T., Pinker S., Cash S. S., Schomer D. & Halgren E. (2009) Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and articulatory information within Broca's area. Science 326:445.
Sandler W., Meir I., Padden C. & Aronoff M. (2005) The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102:2661–65.
Schmidt R. A. & Wrisberg C. A. (2004) Motor learning and performance, third edition. Human Kinetics.
Schultz W., Dayan P. & Montague P. R. (1997) A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275:1593–99.
Seidenberg M. S. (1997) Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science 275:1599–603.
Seidenberg M. S. & McClelland J. L. (1989) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review 96:523–68.
Shannon C. (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27:623–56.
Siegel D. (1978) The adjacency constraint and the theory of morphology. North East Linguistics Society 8:189–97.
Sigman M. & Dehaene S. (2005) Parsing a cognitive task: A characterization of the mind's bottleneck. PLOS Biology 3(2):e37. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030037.
Silbert L. J., Honey C. J., Simony E., Poeppel D. & Hasson U. (2014) Coupled neural systems underlie the production and comprehension of naturalistic narrative speech. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111:E4687–96.
Simon H. A. (1956) Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 63:129–38.
Simon H. A. (1982) Models of bounded rationality: Empirically grounded economic reason. MIT Press.
Simons D. J. & Levin D. T. (1998) Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 5:644–49.
Siyanova-Chanturia A., Conklin K. & Van Heuven W. J. B. (2011) Seeing a phrase “time and again” matters: The role of phrasal frequency in the processing of multiword sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 37:776784.
Smith K. & Kirby S. (2008) Cultural evolution: Implications for understanding the human language faculty and its evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363:3591–603.
Smith K. & Wonnacott E. (2010) Eliminating unpredictable variation through iterated learning. Cognition 116:444–49.
Smith M. & Wheeldon L. (1999) High level processing scope in spoken sentence production. Cognition 73:205–46.
Snedeker J. & Trueswell J. (2003) Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and referential context. Journal of Memory and Language 48:103–30.
Sperling G. (1960) The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 74:129.
Staub A. & Clifton C. Jr., (2006) Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: Evidence from either … or. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 32:425–36.
Steedman M. (1987) Combinatory grammars and parasitic gaps. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5:403–39.
Steedman M. (2000) The syntactic process. MIT Press.
Stephens G. J., Honey C. J. & Hasson U. (2013) A place for time: The spatiotemporal structure of neural dynamics during natural audition. Journal of Neurophysiology 110(9):2019–26.
Stephens G. J., Silbert L. J. & Hasson U. (2010) Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication. PNAS 107:14425–30.
Stivers T., Enfield N. J., Brown P., Englert C., Hayashi M., Heinemann T., Hoymann G., Rossano F., de Ruiter J. P., Yoon K.-Y. & Levinson S. C. (2009) Universals and cultural variation in turn-taking in conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106:10587–92.
Studdert-Kennedy M. (1986) Some developments in research on language behavior. In: Behavioral and social science: Fifty years of discovery: In commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of the “Ogburn Report,” recent social trends in the United States, ed. Smelser N. J. & Gerstein D. R., pp. 208–48. National Academy Press.
Sturt P. & Crocker M. W. (1996) Monotonic syntactic processing: A cross-linguistic study of attachment and reanalysis. Language and Cognitive Processes 11:449–94.
Swaab T., Brown C. M. & Hagoort P. (2003) Understanding words in sentence contexts: The time course of ambiguity resolution. Brain and Language 86:326–43.
Tanenhaus M. K., Spivey-Knowlton M. J., Eberhard K. M. & Sedivy J. C. (1995) Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 268:1632–34.
Tenenbaum J. B., Kemp C., Griffiths T. L. & Goodman N. D. (2011) How to grow a mind: Statistics, structure, and abstraction. Science 331:1279–85.
Thornton R., MacDonald M. C. & Gil M. (1999) Pragmatic constraint on the interpretation of complex noun phrases in Spanish and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25:1347–65.
Tomasello M. (1992) First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development. Cambridge University Press.
Tomasello M. (2003) Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
Townsend D. J. & Bever T. G. (2001) Sentence comprehension: The integration of habits and rules. MIT Press.
Treisman A. (1964) Selective attention in man. British Medical Bulletin 20:1216.
Treisman A. & Schmidt H. (1982) Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology 14:107–41.
Tremblay A. & Baayen H. (2010) Holistic processing of regular four-word sequences: A behavioral and ERP study of the effects of structure, frequency, and probability on immediate free recall. In: Perspectives on formulaic language, ed. Wood D., pp. 151–67. Continuum International Publishing.
Tremblay A., Derwing B., Libben G. & Westbury C. (2011) Processing advantages of lexical bundles: Evidence from self-paced reading and sentence recall tasks. Language Learning 61:569613.
Trudgill P. (2011) Sociolinguistic typology: Social determinants of linguistic complexity. Oxford University Press.
Trueswell J. C. & Tanenhaus M. K. (1994) Towards a lexicalist framework of constraint-based syntactic ambiguity resolution. In: Perspectives on sentence processing, ed. Clifton C., Frazier L. & Rayner K., pp. 155–79. Erlbaum.
Trueswell J. C., Sekerina I., Hill N. M. & Logrip M. L. (1999) The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 73:89134.
Trueswell J. C., Tanenhaus M. K. & Garnsey S. M. (1994) Semantic influences on parsing: Use of thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language 33:285318.
Trueswell J. C., Tanenhaus M. K. & Kello C. (1993) Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing: Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19:528–53.
Valian V., Solt S. & Stewart J. (2009) Abstract categories or limited-scope formulae? The case of children's determiners. Journal of Child Language 36:743–78.
Van Berkum J. J., Brown C. M., Zwitserlood P., Kooijman V. & Hagoort P. (2005) Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31:443–67.
van den Brink D., Brown C. M. & Hagoort P. (2001) Electrophysiological evidence for early contextual influences during spoken-word recognition: N200 versus N400 effects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13:967–85.
Van Everbroeck E. (1999) Language type frequency and learnability: A connectionist appraisal. In: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, August 1999, pp. 755–60, ed. Hahn M. & Stoness S. C.. Erlbaum.
van Gompel R. P. & Liversedge S. P. (2003) The influence of morphological information on cataphoric pronoun assignment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29:128–39.
Wang W. S.-Y. (1969) Competing changes as a cause of residue. Language 45:925.
Wang W. S.-Y., ed. (1977) The lexicon in phonological change. Mouton.
Wang W. S.-Y. & Cheng C.-C. (1977) Implementation of phonological change: The Shaung-feng Chinese case. In: The lexicon in phonological change, ed. Wang W. S.-Y., pp. 86100. Mouton.
Warren P. & Marslen-Wilson W. (1987) Continuous uptake of acoustic cues in spoken word recognition. Perception & Psychophysics 41:262–75.
Warren R. M., Obusek C. J., Farmer R. M. & Warren R. P. (1969) Auditory sequence: Confusion of patterns other than speech or music. Science 164:586–87.
Wasow T. & Arnold J. (2003) Post-verbal constituent ordering in English. In: Determinants of grammatical variation in English, ed. Rohdenburg G. & Mondorf B., pp. 119–54. Mouton de Gruyter.
Weissenborn J. & Höhle B., eds. (2001) Approaches to bootstrapping: Phonological, lexical, syntactic and neurophysiological aspects of early language acquisition. John Benjamins.
Wicha N. Y. Y., Moreno E. M. & Kutas M. (2004) Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16:1272–88.
Wilbur R. B. & Nolkn S. B. (1986) The duration of syllables in American Sign Language. Language and Speech 29:263–80.
Wilson M. & Emmorey K. (2006) Comparing sign language and speech reveals a universal limit on short-term memory capacity. Psychological Science 17:682–83.
Winograd T. (1972) Understanding natural language. Cognitive Psychology 3:1191.
Wolpert D. M., Diedrichsen J. & Flanagan J. R. (2011) Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 12:739–51.
Yang C. (2002) Knowledge and learning in natural language. Oxford University Press.
Yang C. (2013) Ontogeny and phylogeny of language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:6324–27.
Zhu L., Chen Y., Torrable A., Freeman W. & Yuille A. L. (2010) Part and appearance sharing: Recursive compositional models for multi-view multi-object detection. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPRW 2010), San Francisco, CA, June 2010, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE).
Zipf G. K. (1949) Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 132
Total number of PDF views: 951 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2519 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.