Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

On language and evolution: Why neo-adaptationism fails

  • Eric Reuland (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

I identify a number of problematic aspects of Christiansen & Chater's (C&C's) contribution. These include their suggestion that subjacency and binding reflect non-domain-specific mechanisms; that proto-language is a “cultural product”; and that non-adaptationism requires overly rich innate structures, and is incompatible with acceptable evolutionary processes. It shows that a fully UG (Universal Grammar)-free version of the authors' neo-adaptationism would be incoherent.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Baddeley A. D. (2007) Working memory, thought and action. Oxford University Press.
Berwick R. C. & Weinberg A. S. (1984) The grammatical basis of linguistic performance: Language use and acquisition. MIT Press.
Chomsky N. (1981) Lectures on government and binding. Foris.
Chomsky N. (1986) Knowledge of language. Praeger.
Chomsky N. (1995) The minimalist program. MIT Press.
de Saussure F. (1916) Cours de linguistique générale [Course in general linguistics], ed. Bally C. & Sechehaye A., with the collaboration of A. Riedlinger. Payot. (Original publication).
Ellefson M. R. & Christiansen M. H. (2000) Subjacency constraints without universal grammar: Evidence from artificial language learning and connectionist modeling. In: The Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Cognitive Science Society Conference, ed. Gleitman L. R. & Joshi A. K., pp. 645–50. Erlbaum.
Hauser M. D., Chomsky N. & Fitch W. T. (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 298(5598):1569–79.
Khomitsevich O. (2008) Dependencies across phases. LOT International Series.
Pinker S. & Bloom P. (1990) Natural language and natural selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13:707–27; discussion 727–84. Available at: http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/OldArchive/bbs.pinker.html.
Reuland E. (2005a) On the evolution and genesis of language: The force of imagination. Lingue e Linguaggio 1:81110.
Reuland E. (2005b) Binding conditions: How are they derived? In: Proceedings of the HPSG05 Conference Department of Informatics, University of Lisbon, ed. Müller S.. CSLI Publications. Available at: http://cslipublications.stanford.edu/.
Reuland E. (in press) Language – Symbolization and beyond. In: The prehistory of language, ed. Knight C. & Botha R.. Oxford University Press.
Reuland E. (forthcoming) Imagination, planning and working memory: The emergence of language. In: Extended working memory and the evolution of modern thinking, ed. Coolidge F. & Wynn T.. Berger.
Reuland E. (under contract) Anaphora and language design. MIT Press.
Slioussar N. (2007) Grammar and information structure. LOT International Series.
Szabolcsi A. (2005) Strong vs. weak islands. In: The Blackwell companion to syntax, ed. Everaert M. & Riemsdijk H.. Blackwell.
Ullman M. T. (2004) Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition 92:231–70.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 16
Total number of PDF views: 15 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 66 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.