Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-hqlzj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-08T12:20:21.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Processing demands associated with relational complexity: Testing predictions with dual-task methodologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 1998

Daniel B. Berch  and
Elizabeth J. Foley
Daniel B. Berch
Affiliation:
Child Development and Behavior Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD 20892-7510 db254g@nih.gov
Elizabeth J. Foley
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0376
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We discuss how modified dual-task approaches may be used to verify the degree to which cognitive tasks are capacity demanding. We also delineate some of the complexities associated with the use of the “double easy-to-hard” paradigm for testing claim of Halford, Wilson & Phillips that hierarchical reasoning imposes processing demands equivalent to those of transitive reasoning.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , December 1998 , pp. 832 - 833
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable