Skip to main content Accessibility help

Propositional learning is a useful research heuristic but it is not a theoretical algorithm

  • A. G. Baker (a1), Irina Baetu (a1) and Robin A. Murphy (a2)

Mitchell et al.'s claim, that their propositional theory is a single-process theory, is illusory because they relegate some learning to a secondary memory process. This renders the single-process theory untestable. The propositional account is not a process theory of learning, but rather, a heuristic that has led to interesting research.

Hide All
Anderson, J. R. & Lebiere, C. J. (1998) Hybrid modeling of cognition: Review of the atomic components of thought. Erlbaum.
Baetu, I. & Baker, A. G. (in press) Human judgments of positive and negative causal chains. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes.
Baeyens, F., Eelen, P. & Van den Bergh, O. (1990a) Contingency awareness in evaluative conditioning: A case for unaware affective-evaluative learning. Cognition and Emotion 4:318.
Baker, A. G. & Mackintosh, N. J. (1979) Pre-exposure to the CS alone, US alone, or CS and US uncorrelated: Latent inhibition, blocking by context or learned irrelevance? Learning and Motivation 10:278–94.
Baker, A. G., Murphy, R. A. & Mehta, R. (2003) Learned irrelevance and retrospective correlation learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 56:90101.
Bouton, M. E. (2004) Context and behavioral processes in extinction. Learning and Memory 11:485–94.
Brewer, W. F. (1974) There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In: Cognition and the symbolic processes, ed. Weimer, W. B. & Palermo, D. S., pp. 142. Erlbaum.
Cheng, P. W. (1997) From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review 104:367405.
De Houwer, J. & Beckers, T. (2003) Secondary task difficulty modulates forward blocking in human contingency learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 56B:345–57.
Diez-Chamizo, V., Sterio, D. & Mackintosh, N. J. (1985) Blocking and overshadowing between intra-maze and extra-maze cues: A test of the independence of locale and guidance learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37B:235–53.
Marr, D. (1982) Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. Freeman.
McCulloch, W. S. & Pitts, W. H. (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics 5:115–33.
Murphy, R. A. & Baker, A. G. (2004) A role for CS-US contingency in Pavlovian conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 30:229–39.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1973) What the mind's eye tells the mind's brain: A critique of mental imagery. Psychological Bulletin 80:124.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1970) On the generality of the laws of learning. Psychological Review 77:406–18.
Shultz, T. R. (2003) Computational developmental psychology. MIT Press.
Shultz, T. R., Mareschal, D. & Schmidt, W. C. (1994) Modeling cognitive development on balance scale phenomena. Machine Learning 16:5786.
Swartzentruber, D. & Rescorla, M. E. (1994) Modulation of trained and extinguished stimuli by facilitators and inhibitors. Animal Learning and Behavior 22:309–16.
Tolman, E. C. (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review 55:189208.
Waldmann, M. R. & Walker, J. M. (2005) Competence and performance in causal learning. Learning and Behavior 33:211–29.
Wasserman, E. A., Elek, S. M., Chatlosh, D. L. & Baker, A. G. (1993) Rating causal relations: Role of probability in judgments of response-outcome contingency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19:174–88.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed