Skip to main content

Relation priming, the lexical boost, and alignment in dialogue

  • Claudine N. Raffray (a1), Martin J. Pickering (a1) and Holly P. Branigan (a1)

The authors' claim that analogical reasoning is the product of relational priming is compatible with language processing work that emphasizes the role of low-level automatic processes in the alignment of situation models in dialogue. However, their model ignores recent behavioral evidence demonstrating a “lexical boost” effect on relational priming. We discuss implications of these data.

Hide All
Branigan H. P., Pickering M. J. & Cleland A. A. (2000) Syntactic coordination in dialogue. Cognition 75:B1325.
Cleland A. A. & Pickering M. J. (2003) The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language 49:214–30.
Garrod S. C. & Anderson A. (1987) Saying what you mean in dialogue: A study in conceptual and semantic co-ordination. Cognition 27:181218.
Goswami U. & Brown A. L. (1989) Melting chocolate and melting snowmen: Analogical reasoning and causal relations. Cognition 35:6995.
Pickering M. J. & Branigan H. P. (1998) The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic persistence in written language production. Journal of Memory and Language 39:633–51.
Pickering M. J. & Garrod S. (2004) Towards a mechanistic theory of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:169226.
Raffray C. N., Pickering M. J. & Branigan H. P. (2007) Priming the interpretation of noun-noun combinations. Journal of Memory and Language 57:380–95.
Schober M. F. (1993) Spatial perspective-taking in conversation. Cognition 47:124.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 21 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 67 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.