Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-tbj44 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T05:54:54.535Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Residual normality: Friend or foe?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 August 2003

Michael Thomas  and
Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Michael Thomas
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom m.thomas@bbk.ac.uk
Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Affiliation:
Neurocognitive Development Unit, Institute of Child Health, London WC1N 1EH, United Kingdom a.karmiloff-smith@ich.ucl.ac.uk http://www.ich.ucl.ac.uk/units/ncdu/NDU_homepage.htm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In response to our target article, many of the commentators concentrated on our notion of Residual Normality. In our response, we focus on the questions raised by this idea. However, we also examine broader issues concerning the importance of incorporating a realistic theory of the process of development into explanations of developmental deficits.

Information

Type
Author's Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 25 , Issue 6 , December 2002 , pp. 772 - 780
Copyright
© 2002 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable