Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 127
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Apostolou, Menelaos and Stephen, Ian 2016. Size did not matter: An evolutionary account of the variation in penis size and size anxiety. Cogent Psychology, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 1147933.


    Apostolou, Menelaos 2016. An evolutionary account of the prevalence of personality traits that impair intimate relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 94, p. 140.


    Arden, Rosalind Luciano, Michelle Deary, Ian J Reynolds, Chandra A Pedersen, Nancy L Plassman, Brenda L McGue, Matt Christensen, Kaare and Visscher, Peter M 2016. Authors’ Response to Kaufman and Muntaner. International Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 45, Issue. 2, p. 578.


    Daly, Mark J. Robinson, Elise B. and Neale, Benjamin M. 2016. Genomics, Circuits, and Pathways in Clinical Neuropsychiatry.


    Frankenhuis, Willem E. Panchanathan, Karthik and Belsky, Jay 2016. A mathematical model of the evolution of individual differences in developmental plasticity arising through parental bet-hedging. Developmental Science, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 251.


    Giudice, Marco Del and Ellis, Bruce J. 2016. Developmental Psychopathology.


    Kitayama, Shinobu King, Anthony Hsu, Ming Liberzon, Israel and Yoon, Carolyn 2016. Dopamine-system genes and cultural acquisition: the norm sensitivity hypothesis. Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 8, p. 167.


    Knežević, Goran Lazarević, Ljiljana B. Bosnjak, Michael Purić, Danka Petrović, Boban Teovanović, Predrag Opačić, Goran and Bodroža, Bojana 2016. Towards a personality model encompassing a Disintegration factor separate from the Big Five traits: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 95, p. 214.


    Taub, Daniel R. and Page, Joshua 2016. Molecular Signatures of Natural Selection for Polymorphic Genes of the Human Dopaminergic and Serotonergic Systems: A Review. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,


    Vall, Gemma Gutiérrez, Fernando Peri, Josep M. Gárriz, Miguel Baillés, Eva Garrido, Juan Miguel and Obiols, Jordi E. 2016. Seven dimensions of personality pathology are under sexual selection in modern Spain. Evolution and Human Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 169.


    Zietsch, Brendan P 2016. Individual differences as the output of evolved calibration mechanisms: does the theory make sense in view of empirical observations?. Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 7, p. 71.


    Burri, Andrea Spector, Tim and Rahman, Qazi 2015. Common Genetic Factors among Sexual Orientation, Gender Nonconformity, and Number of Sex Partners in Female Twins: Implications for the Evolution of Homosexuality. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, Vol. 12, Issue. 4, p. 1004.


    Durisko, Zachary Mulsant, Benoit H. and Andrews, Paul W. 2015. An adaptationist perspective on the etiology of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 172, p. 315.


    Haysom, Hannah J. Verweij, Karin J.H. and Zietsch, Brendan P. 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.


    Lukaszewski, Aaron W. and von Rueden, Christopher R. 2015. The extraversion continuum in evolutionary perspective: A review of recent theory and evidence. Personality and Individual Differences, Vol. 77, p. 186.


    Manson, Joseph H. and Fairbanks, Lynn A. 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.


    Merner, Nancy D. Dion, Patrick A. and Rouleau, Guy A. 2015. The Genetics of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.


    Millan, Mark J. Goodwin, Guy M. Meyer-Lindenberg, Andreas and Ove Ögren, Sven 2015. Learning from the past and looking to the future: Emerging perspectives for improving the treatment of psychiatric disorders. European Neuropsychopharmacology, Vol. 25, Issue. 5, p. 599.


    Mitchell, Kevin J. 2015. The Genetics of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.


    Moore, Holly and Robbins, Trevor W. 2015. Psychiatry.


    ×

Resolving the paradox of common, harmful, heritable mental disorders: Which evolutionary genetic models work best?

  • Matthew C. Keller (a1) and Geoffrey Miller (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06009095
  • Published online: 09 November 2006
Abstract

Given that natural selection is so powerful at optimizing complex adaptations, why does it seem unable to eliminate genes (susceptibility alleles) that predispose to common, harmful, heritable mental disorders, such as schizophrenia or bipolar disorder? We assess three leading explanations for this apparent paradox from evolutionary genetic theory: (1) ancestral neutrality (susceptibility alleles were not harmful among ancestors), (2) balancing selection (susceptibility alleles sometimes increased fitness), and (3) polygenic mutation-selection balance (mental disorders reflect the inevitable mutational load on the thousands of genes underlying human behavior). The first two explanations are commonly assumed in psychiatric genetics and Darwinian psychiatry, while mutation-selection has often been discounted. All three models can explain persistent genetic variance in some traits under some conditions, but the first two have serious problems in explaining human mental disorders. Ancestral neutrality fails to explain low mental disorder frequencies and requires implausibly small selection coefficients against mental disorders given the data on the reproductive costs and impairment of mental disorders. Balancing selection (including spatio-temporal variation in selection, heterozygote advantage, antagonistic pleiotropy, and frequency-dependent selection) tends to favor environmentally contingent adaptations (which would show no heritability) or high-frequency alleles (which psychiatric genetics would have already found). Only polygenic mutation-selection balance seems consistent with the data on mental disorder prevalence rates, fitness costs, the likely rarity of susceptibility alleles, and the increased risks of mental disorders with brain trauma, inbreeding, and paternal age. This evolutionary genetic framework for mental disorders has wide-ranging implications for psychology, psychiatry, behavior genetics, molecular genetics, and evolutionary approaches to studying human behavior.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: