No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Secure footing
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 May 2011
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Zeiler appreciates my organism-centered approach but believes that it issues from the wrong framework and focuses on the wrong phenomena. He is a “sharpener,” I a “leveler”; I believe that the full complexities of organisms in their natural environments should be the terminus, not the origin of our scientific enquiry. The study of schedule performance is oblique but not orthogonal to that terminus, and offers us a secure footing for the next step upward in complexity.
Information
- Type
- Author's Response
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996
References
Bolles, R. C. (1994) The response problem. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17: 135–136. [MDZ]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killeen, Peter R. (1994a) Mathematical principles of reinforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17: 105–172. [PRK, MDZ]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, B. F. (1950) Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review 57: 193–216. [PRK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Skinner, B. F. (1969) Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts. [PRK]Google Scholar
Timberlake, W. (1994) Animal-centered models of reinforcement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 17: 153–154. [MDZ]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have
Access