Skip to main content
×
Home

Self-deception: Adaptation or by-product?

  • Hugo Mercier (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

By systematically biasing our beliefs, self-deception can endanger our ability to successfully convey our messages. It can also lead lies to degenerate into more severe damages in relationships. Accordingly, I suggest that the biases reviewed in the target article do not aim at self-deception but instead are the by-products of several other mechanisms: our natural tendency to self-enhance, the confirmation bias inherent in reasoning, and the lack of access to our unconscious minds.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Carruthers P. (2009b) How we know our own minds: The relationship between mindreading and metacognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(2):121–82.
DePaulo B. M., Lindsay J. J., Malone B. E., Muhlenbruck L., Charlton K. & Cooper H. (2003) Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin 129(1):74118.
Kim P. H., Ferrin D. L., Cooper C. D. & Dirks K. T. (2004) Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence-versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology 89(1):104.
Mercier H. & Landemore H. (in press) Reasoning is for arguing: Understanding the successes and failures of deliberation. Political Psychology.
Mercier H. & Sperber D. (in press) Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
Nickerson R. S. (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomena in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2:175220.
Raghunathan R. & Trope Y. (2002) Walking the tightrope between feeling good and being accurate: Mood as a resource in processing persuasive messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83(3):510–25.
Schwarz N. & Skurnik I. (2003) Feeling and thinking: Implications for problem solving. In: The nature of problem solving, ed. Davidson J. & Sternberg R. J., pp. 263–92. Cambridge University Press.
Schweitzer M. E., Hershey J. & Bradlow E. (2006) Promises and lies: Restoring violated trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 101:119.
Sperber D., Clément F., Heintz C., Mascaro O., Mercier H., Origgi G. & Wilson D. (2010) Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language 25(4):359–93.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 38 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 124 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.