Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-h5th4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-26T01:08:12.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Semantic cognition or data mining?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2008

Denny Borsboom
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.borsboom@uva.nlhttp://users.fmg.uva.nl/dborsboom/i.visser@uva.nlhttp://users.fmg.uva.nl/ivisser/
Ingmar Visser
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018WB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.borsboom@uva.nlhttp://users.fmg.uva.nl/dborsboom/i.visser@uva.nlhttp://users.fmg.uva.nl/ivisser/

Abstract

We argue that neural networks for semantic cognition, as proposed by Rogers & McClelland (R&M), do not acquire semantics and therefore cannot be the basis for a theory of semantic cognition. The reason is that the neural networks simply perform statistical categorization procedures, and these do not require any semantics for their successful operation. We conclude that this has severe consequences for the semantic cognition views of R&M.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable