Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-xh45t Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-13T14:41:14.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sensorimotor contingencies do not replace internal representations, and mastery is not necessary for perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2002

Ernst Niebur
Ernst Niebur
Affiliation:
Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute and Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 niebur@jhu.edu http://www.cnslab.mb.jhu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sensorimotor contingencies are certainly of great importance for perception but they are no substitute for the internal representation of perceived information. I argue that internal, non-iconic representations of perceptions must, and do, exist and that sensorimotor contingencies are an integral part of them. Further, I argue that mastery of the sensory apparatus or environment is not a prerequisite for perception and that perception is possible in the absence of any control over the perceptual process.

Information

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , October 2001 , pp. 994 - 995
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable