Seegelke, Christian Hughes, Charmayne Mary Lee and Schack, Thomas 2014. Manual (a)symmetries in grasp posture planning: a short review. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5,
Kemmerer, David Rudrauf, David Manzel, Ken and Tranel, Daniel 2012. Behavioral patterns and lesion sites associated with impaired processing of lexical and conceptual knowledge of actions. Cortex, Vol. 48, Issue. 7, p. 826.
Thomaschke, Roland Miall, R. Christopher Rueß, Miriam Mehta, Puja R. and Hopkins, Brian 2017. Visuomotor and motorvisual priming with different types of set-level congruency: evidence in support of ideomotor theory, and the planning and control model (PCM). Psychological Research,
Mendoza, Jocelyn E. Elliott, Digby Meegan, Daniel V. Lyons, James L. and Welsh, Timothy N. 2006. The effect of the Müller-Lyer illusion on the planning and control of manual aiming movements.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 32, Issue. 2, p. 413.
Creem-Regehr, Sarah H. and Kunz, Benjamin R. 2010. Perception and action. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, Vol. 1, Issue. 6, p. 800.
Kilintari, M. Raos, V. and Savaki, H. E. 2011. Grasping in the Dark Activates Early Visual Cortices. Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 21, Issue. 4, p. 949.
Koester, Dirk Schack, Thomas and Westerholz, Jan 2016. Neurophysiology of Grasping Actions: Evidence from ERPs. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,
Yuen, I. Davis, M. H. Brysbaert, M. and Rastle, K. 2010. Activation of articulatory information in speech perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 107, Issue. 2, p. 592.
Tahej, Pierre-Karim Ferrel-Chapus, Carole Olivier, Isabelle Ginhac, Dominique and Rolland, Jean-Pierre 2012. Multiple representations and mechanisms for visuomotor adaptation in young children. Human Movement Science, Vol. 31, Issue. 6, p. 1425.
Tucker, Mike and Ellis, Rob 2004. Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 116, Issue. 2, p. 185.
Bub, Daniel N. Masson, Michael E.J. and Cree, George S. 2008. Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition, Vol. 106, Issue. 1, p. 27.
Hommel, Bernhard 2015. The theory of event coding (TEC) as embodied-cognition framework. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,
van Kampen, P.M. Ledebt, A. Smorenburg, A.R.P. Vermeulen, R.J. Kelder, M.E. van der Kamp, J. and Savelsbergh, G.J.P. 2012. Gaze behaviour during interception in children with Spastic Unilateral Cerebral Palsy. Research in Developmental Disabilities, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 45.
Jax, Steven A. Buxbaum, Laurel J. Lie, Eunhui and Coslett, H. Branch 2009. More than (where the target) meets the eyes: Disrupted visuomotor transformations in optic ataxia. Neuropsychologia, Vol. 47, Issue. 1, p. 230.
Niermeyer, Madison A. Suchy, Yana and Ziemnik, Rosemary E. 2017. Motor sequencing in older adulthood: relationships with executive functioning and effects of complexity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 598.
van Kampen, Paulien M. Ledebt, Annick and Savelsbergh, Geert J.P. 2010. Planning of an interceptive movement in children. Neuroscience Letters, Vol. 473, Issue. 2, p. 110.
Króliczak, Grzegorz Heard, Priscilla Goodale, Melvyn A. and Gregory, Richard L. 2006. Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion. Brain Research, Vol. 1080, Issue. 1, p. 9.
Heurley, LoÃ¯c P. and Ferrier, Laurent P. 2015. What are memory-perception interactions for? Implications for action. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 5,
Velde, Arenda F. Kamp, John. and Savelsbergh, Geert J. P. 2008. Five- to twelve-year-olds' control of movement velocity in a dynamic collision avoidance task. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 33.
Boy, F. Palluel-Germain, R. Orliaguet, J.-P. and Coello, Y. 2005. Dissociation between “where” and “how” judgements of one's own motor performance in a video-controlled reaching task. Neuroscience Letters, Vol. 386, Issue. 1, p. 52.
BRISCOE, ROBERT 2009. Egocentric Spatial Representation in Action and Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Vol. 79, Issue. 2, p. 423.
Buxbaum, Laurel J. Kyle, Kathleen M. Tang, Kathy and Detre, John A. 2006. Neural substrates of knowledge of hand postures for object grasping and functional object use: Evidence from fMRI. Brain Research, Vol. 1117, Issue. 1, p. 175.
Singhal, Anthony Monaco, Simona Kaufman, Liam D. Culham, Jody C. and Baker, Chris I. 2013. Human fMRI Reveals That Delayed Action Re-Recruits Visual Perception. PLoS ONE, Vol. 8, Issue. 9, p. e73629.
Kemmerer, David Castillo, Javier Gonzalez Talavage, Thomas Patterson, Stephanie and Wiley, Cynthia 2008. Neuroanatomical distribution of five semantic components of verbs: Evidence from fMRI. Brain and Language, Vol. 107, Issue. 1, p. 16.
Oláh, Katalin Elekes, Fruzsina Pető, Réka Peres, Krisztina and Király, Ildikó 2016. 3-Year-Old Children Selectively Generalize Object Functions Following a Demonstration from a Linguistic In-group Member: Evidence from the Phenomenon of Scale Error. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,
Kessler, Klaus Biermann-Ruben, Katja Jonas, Melanie Roman Siebner, Hartwig Bäumer, Tobias Münchau, Alexander and Schnitzler, Alfons 2006. Investigating the human mirror neuron system by means of cortical synchronization during the imitation of biological movements. NeuroImage, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 227.
Frey, Scott H. 2007. What Puts the How in Where? Tool Use and the Divided Visual Streams Hypothesis. Cortex, Vol. 43, Issue. 3, p. 368.
Ware, Elizabeth A. Uttal, David H. and DeLoache, Judy S. 2010. Everyday scale errors. Developmental Science, Vol. 13, Issue. 1, p. 28.
Caljouw, Simone R. Veldkamp, Renee and Lamoth, Claudine J. C. 2016. Implicit and Explicit Learning of a Sequential Postural Weight-Shifting Task in Young and Older Adults. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,
Taghizadeh, Bahareh and Gail, Alexander 2014. Spatial task context makes short-latency reaches prone to induced Roelofs illusion. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 8,
Dötsch, Dominik Vesper, Cordula and Schubö, Anna 2017. How You Move Is What I See: Planning an Action Biases a Partner’s Visual Search. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8,
Butz, Martin V. 2016. Toward a Unified Sub-symbolic Computational Theory of Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,
Caljouw, Simone R. van der Kamp, John and Savelsbergh, Geert J.P. 2006. The impact of task-constraints on the planning and control of interceptive hitting movements. Neuroscience Letters, Vol. 392, Issue. 1-2, p. 84.
Snyder, Janice J. and Bischof, Walter F. 2010. Knowing where we're heading — When nothing moves. Brain Research, Vol. 1323, p. 127.
Rosengren, Karl S. Carmichael, Caitlin Schein, Stevie S. Anderson, Kathy N. and Gutiérrez, Isabel T. 2009. A method for eliciting scale errors in preschool classrooms. Infant Behavior and Development, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 286.
Spiegel, M.A. Koester, D. Weigelt, M. and Schack, T. 2012. The costs of changing an intended action: Movement planning, but not execution, interferes with verbal working memory. Neuroscience Letters, Vol. 509, Issue. 2, p. 82.
Lindemann, Oliver Stenneken, Prisca van Schie, Hein T. and Bekkering, Harold 2006. Semantic activation in action planning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 633.
Bakker, M. De Lange, F.P. Helmich, R.C. Scheeringa, R. Bloem, B.R. and Toni, I. 2008. Cerebral correlates of motor imagery of normal and precision gait. NeuroImage, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 998.
Toates, Frederick 2006. A model of the hierarchy of behaviour, cognition, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 75.
Wenderoth, Nicole Toni, Ivan Bedeleem, Sigrid Debaere, Filiep and Swinnen, Stephan P. 2006. Information processing in human parieto-frontal circuits during goal-directed bimanual movements. NeuroImage, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 264.
Fuelscher, Ian Williams, Jacqueline Wilmut, Kate Enticott, Peter G. and Hyde, Christian 2016. Modeling the Maturation of Grip Selection Planning and Action Representation: Insights from Typical and Atypical Motor Development. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,
Zhang, Y. Fan, L. Zhang, Y. Wang, J. Zhu, M. Zhang, Y. Yu, C. and Jiang, T. 2014. Connectivity-Based Parcellation of the Human Posteromedial Cortex. Cerebral Cortex, Vol. 24, Issue. 3, p. 719.
Buhr, Anthony and Zebrowski, Patricia 2009. Sentence position and syntactic complexity of stuttering in early childhood: A longitudinal study. Journal of Fluency Disorders, Vol. 34, Issue. 3, p. 155.
Forti, Sara Valli, Angela Perego, Paolo Nobile, Maria Crippa, Alessandro and Molteni, Massimo 2011. Motor planning and control in autism. A kinematic analysis of preschool children. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, Vol. 5, Issue. 2, p. 834.
Franz, V. H. Scharnowski, F. and Gegenfurtner, K. R. 2005. Illusion Effects on Grasping Are Temporally Constant Not Dynamic.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 31, Issue. 6, p. 1359.
Olthuis, Raimey Van Der Kamp, John and Caljouw, Simone 2017. Verbalizations Affect Visuomotor Control in Hitting Objects to Distant Targets. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 8,
Galea, V. 2012. Motor planning and control in autism. A kinematic analysis of preschool children. Yearbook of Sports Medicine, Vol. 2012, p. 380.
Buxbaum, Laurel J. and Kalénine, Solène 2010. Action knowledge, visuomotor activation, and embodiment in the two action systems. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 1191, Issue. 1, p. 201.
Bruno, Nicola Bernardis, Paolo and Gentilucci, Maurizio 2008. Visually guided pointing, the Müller-Lyer illusion, and the functional interpretation of the dorsal-ventral split: Conclusions from 33 independent studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 423.
Vishton, Peter M. Ware, Elizabeth A. and Badger, Amy N. 2005. Different Gestalt processing for different actions? Comparing object-directed reaching and looking time measures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, Vol. 90, Issue. 2, p. 89.
Caniard, Franck BÃ¼lthoff, Heinrich H. and Thornton, Ian M. 2015. Action can amplify motion-induced illusory displacement. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 8,
Boutin, Arnaud Panzer, Stefan Salesse, Robin N. and Blandin, Yannick 2012. Testing promotes effector transfer. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 141, Issue. 3, p. 400.
Glover, Scott Wall, Matthew B. and Smith, Andrew T. 2012. Distinct cortical networks support the planning and online control of reaching-to-grasp in humans. European Journal of Neuroscience, Vol. 35, Issue. 6, p. 909.
Taylor, Lawrence J. and Zwaan, Rolf A. 2010. Grasping spheres, not planets. Cognition, Vol. 115, Issue. 1, p. 39.
Molteni, Erika Cimolin, V. Preatoni, E. Rodano, R. Galli, M. and Bianchi, A. M. 2012. Towards a Biomarker of Motor Adaptation: Integration of Kinematic and Neural Factors. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 258.
Fantoni, Carlo Rigutti, Sara and Gerbino, Walter 2016. Bodily action penetrates affective perception. PeerJ, Vol. 4, p. e1677.
Rjosk, Viola Lepsien, Jöran Kaminski, Elisabeth Hoff, Maike Sehm, Bernhard Steele, Christopher J. Villringer, Arno and Ragert, Patrick 2017. Neural Correlates of Mirror Visual Feedback-Induced Performance Improvements: A Resting-State fMRI Study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 11,
Bullinaria, John A. 2007. Understanding the Emergence of Modularity in Neural Systems. Cognitive Science, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 673.
Evidence for a dichotomy between the planning of an action and its on-line control in humans is reviewed. This evidence suggests that planning and control each serve a specialized purpose utilizing distinct visual representations. Evidence from behavioral studies suggests that planning is influenced by a large array of visual and cognitive information, whereas control is influenced solely by the spatial characteristics of the target, including such things as its size, shape, orientation, and so forth. Evidence from brain imaging and neuropsychology suggests that planning and control are subserved by separate visual centers in the posterior parietal lobes, each constituting part of a larger network for planning and control. Planning appears to rely on phylogenetically newer regions in the inferior parietal lobe, along with the frontal lobes and basal ganglia, whereas control appears to rely on older regions in the superior parietal lobe, along with the cerebellum.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.