Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:19:58.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sex differences in aggression: What does evolutionary theory predict?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2009

Elizabeth Cashdan
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0060. cashdan@anthro.utah.eduhttp://www.anthro.utah.edu/people/faculty/elizabeth-cashdan.html

Abstract

The target article claims that evolutionary theory predicts the emergence of sex differences in aggression in early childhood, and that there will be no sex difference in anger. It also finds an absence of sex differences in spousal abuse in Western societies. All three are puzzling from an evolutionary perspective and warrant further discussion.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Campbell, A. (1999) Staying alive: Evolution, culture and women's intra-sexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:203–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M. & Wilson, M. (1988) Homicide. Aldine de Gruyter.Google ScholarPubMed
Dobash, R. P., Dobash, R. E., Wilson, M. & Daly, M. (1992) The myth of sexual symmetry in marital violence. Social Problems 39:7191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. P. (2006) Conflict and control: Gender symmetry and asymmetry in domestic violence. Violence Against Women 12:1003–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. P. & Leone, J. M. (2005) The differential effects of intimate terrorism and common/situational couple violence: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Journal of Family Issues 26:322–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, M. & Daly, M. (1996) Male sexual proprietariness and violence against wives. Current Directions in Psychological Science 5:27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar