Skip to main content Accessibility help

Shamanism within a general theory of religious action (no cheesecake needed)

  • Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi (a1)


Singh places the understanding of shamanism within the cognitive/evolutionary psychology of religion but is then sidetracked by presenting unhelpful analogies. The concepts of “superstition” as a general term for religious rituals and of “superstitious learning” as a mechanism accounting for the creation of rituals in humans reflect an underestimation of the human imagination, which is guided by cognitive/evolutionary constraints. Mentalizing, hypervigilance in agent detection, and anthropomorphism explain the behaviors involved in religious illusions (or delusions).



Hide All
Bandura, A., Grusec, J. E., & Menlove, F. L. (1966) Observational learning as a function of symbolization and incentive set. Child Development 37:499506.
Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2015). Psychological perspectives on religion and religiosity. London/New York: Routledge.
Burger, J. M. & Lynn, A. L. (2005) Superstitious behavior among American and Japanese professional baseball players. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 27:7176. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2701.
Carroll, J. (1998) Steven Pinker's cheesecake for the mind. Philosophy and Literature 22:478–85.
Davies, S. (2010) Why art is not a spandrel. The British Journal of Aesthetics 50:333–41.
Henslin, J. M. (1967) Craps and magic. American Journal of Sociology 73:316–30.
Legare, C. H., Evans, E. M., Rosengren, K. S. & Harris, P. L. (2012) The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations across cultures and development. Child Development 83:779–93. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01743.x.
Pinker, S. (1997) How the mind works. W. W. Norton.
Porterfield, A. (1987) Shamanism: A psychosocial definition. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 55:721–39.
Sanday, P.R. (1987). Divine hunger: Cannibalism as a cultural system. Cambridge University Press.
Skinner, B. Y. B. F. (1948) “Superstition” in the pigeon. Journal of Experimental Psychology 38:168–72.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed