Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Sins of omission and commission

  • Gerard O'Brien (a1) and Jon Opie (a1)

Abstract

O'Regan & Noë (O&N) fail to address adequately the two most historically important reasons for seeking to explain visual experience in terms of internal representations. They are silent about the apparently inferential nature of perception, and mistaken about the significance of the phenomenology accompanying dreams, hallucinations, and mental imagery.

Copyright

Type Description Title
PDF

 PDF (809 KB)
809 KB

Sins of omission and commission

  • Gerard O'Brien (a1) and Jon Opie (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed