Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Suboptimality in Perceptual Decision Making

  • Dobromir Rahnev (a1) and Rachel N. Denison (a2)
Abstract

Human perceptual decisions are often described as optimal. Critics of this view have argued that claims of optimality are overly flexible and lack explanatory power. Meanwhile, advocates for optimality have countered that such criticisms single out a few selected papers. To elucidate the issue of optimality in perceptual decision making, we review the extensive literature on suboptimal performance in perceptual tasks. We discuss eight different classes of suboptimal perceptual decisions, including improper placement, maintenance, and adjustment of perceptual criteria, inadequate tradeoff between speed and accuracy, inappropriate confidence ratings, misweightings in cue combination, and findings related to various perceptual illusions and biases. In addition, we discuss conceptual shortcomings of a focus on optimality, such as definitional difficulties and the limited value of optimality claims in and of themselves. We therefore advocate that the field drop its emphasis on whether observed behavior is optimal and instead concentrate on building and testing detailed observer models that explain behavior across a wide range of tasks. To facilitate this transition, we compile the proposed hypotheses regarding the origins of suboptimal perceptual decisions reviewed here. We argue that verifying, rejecting, and expanding these explanations for suboptimal behavior – rather than assessing optimality per se – should be among the major goals of the science of perceptual decision making.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Correspondence Dobromir Rahnev, School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, 130 J.S. Coon Building, Atlanta, GA 30332 drahnev@gmail.com rahnevlab.gatech.edu
Rachel Denison, Department of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003 rachel.denison@nyu.edu racheldenison.com
Footnotes
Hide All
*

Authors contributed equally to this work

Footnotes
References
Hide All

* Authors contributed equally to this work

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 111
Total number of PDF views: 1417 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1848 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 27th February 2018 - 21st August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.