Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-24T18:51:28.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Symbols in numbers: From numerals to magnitude information

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2009

Oliver Lindemann ,
Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer  and
Harold Bekkering
Oliver Lindemann
Affiliation:
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. o.lindemann@donders.ru.nls.rueschemeyer@donders.ru.nlh.bekkering@donders.ru.nl
Shirley-Ann Rueschemeyer
Affiliation:
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. o.lindemann@donders.ru.nls.rueschemeyer@donders.ru.nlh.bekkering@donders.ru.nl
Harold Bekkering
Affiliation:
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6500 HE Nijmegen, The Netherlands. o.lindemann@donders.ru.nls.rueschemeyer@donders.ru.nlh.bekkering@donders.ru.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A dual-code model of number processing needs to take into account the difference between a number symbol and its meaning. The transition of automatic non-abstract number representations into intentional abstract representations could be conceptualized as a translation of perceptual asemantic representations of numerals into semantic representations of the associated magnitude information. The controversy about the nature of number representations should be thus related to theories on embodied grounding of symbols.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 3-4 , August 2009 , pp. 341 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andres, M., Davare, M., Pesenti, M., Olivier, E. & Seron, X. (2004) Number magnitude and grip aperture interaction. NeuroReport 15(18):2773–77.Google ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K. & Wilson, C. D. (2008) Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In: Symbols, embodiment, and meaning, ed. De Vega, M., Glenberg, A. M. & Graesser, A. C., pp. 245–83. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen Kadosh, R. (2008a) Numerical representation: Abstract or non-abstract? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(8):1160–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, M. H. (2008) Finger counting habits modulate spatial-numerical associations. Cortex 44(4):386–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fischer, M. H. & Zwaan, R. A. (2008) Embodied language: A review of the role of motor system in language comprehension. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(6):825–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganor-Stern, D. & Tzelgov, J. (2008) Across-notation automatic numerical processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 34(2):430–37.Google ScholarPubMed
Glenberg, A.-M. & Kaschak, M.-P. (2002) Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 9(3):558–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ito, Y. & Hatta, T. (2003) Semantic processing of Arabic, Kanji, and Kana numbers: Evidence from interference in physical and numerical size judgments. Memory and Cognition 31(3):360–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindemann, O., Abolafia, J. M., Girardi, G. & Bekkering, H. (2007) Getting a grip on numbers: Numerical magnitude priming in object grasping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 33(6):1400–09.Google ScholarPubMed
Lindemann, O., Stenneken, P., van, Schie, H, T. & Bekkering, H. (2006) Semantic activation in action planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32(3):633–43.Google ScholarPubMed
Mahon, B. Z. & Caramazza, A. (2008) A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology – Paris 102:59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Lindemann, O., van Elk, M. & Bekkering, H. (in press a) Embodied cognition: The interplay between automatic resonance and selection-for-action mechanisms. European Journal of Social Psychology.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, S.-A., Rooij, D. V., Lindemann, O., Willems, R. & Bekkering, H. (in press b). The function of words: Distinct neural correlates for words denoting differently manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.Google Scholar
Walsh, V. (2003) A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(11):483–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwaan, R. A. & Taylor, L. J. (2006) Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 135(1):1–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed