Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 191
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Boos, Moritz Seer, Caroline Lange, Florian and Kopp, Bruno 2016. Probabilistic Inference: Task Dependency and Individual Differences of Probability Weighting Revealed by Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,


    Ganuthula, Venkat Ram Reddy and Dyaram, Lata 2016. Rationality and the reflective mind: A case for typical performance measure of cognitive ability. Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 49, p. 216.


    Grüne-Yanoff, Till and Hertwig, Ralph 2016. Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory?. Minds and Machines, Vol. 26, Issue. 1-2, p. 149.


    Neth, Hansjörg Sims, Chris R. and Gray, Wayne D. 2016. Rational Task Analysis: A Methodology to Benchmark Bounded Rationality. Minds and Machines, Vol. 26, Issue. 1-2, p. 125.


    Rottman, Benjamin M. and Hastie, Reid 2016. Do people reason rationally about causally related events? Markov violations, weak inferences, and failures of explaining away. Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 87, p. 88.


    Shao, Wanyun 2016. Are actual weather and perceived weather the same? Understanding perceptions of local weather and their effects on risk perceptions of global warming. Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 19, Issue. 6, p. 722.


    2016. Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation, Second Edition.


    Bohil, Corey J. and Wismer, Andrew J. 2015. Implicit learning mediates base rate acquisition in perceptual categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 586.


    Butler, Ainslie J. Thomas, M. Kate and Pintar, Katarina D.M. 2015. Systematic Review of Expert Elicitation Methods as a Tool for Source Attribution of Enteric Illness. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, Vol. 12, Issue. 5, p. 367.


    Cohen, Andrew L. and Staub, Adrian 2015. Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies. Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 81, p. 26.


    Domurat, Artur Kowalczuk, Olga Idzikowska, Katarzyna Borzymowska, Zuzanna and Nowak-Przygodzka, Marta 2015. Bayesian probability estimates are not necessary to make choices satisfying Bayes’ rule in elementary situations. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,


    Gastwirth, Joseph L. 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.


    Goodwin, Paul 2015. When simple alternatives to Bayes formula work well: Reducing the cognitive load when updating probability forecasts. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 68, Issue. 8, p. 1686.


    Güney, Şule and Newell, Ben R. 2015. Overcoming Ambiguity Aversion Through Experience. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, Vol. 28, Issue. 2, p. 188.


    Hafenbrädl, Sebastian and Hoffrage, Ulrich 2015. Toward an ecological analysis of Bayesian inferences: how task characteristics influence responses. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,


    Handley, Simon J. and Trippas, Dries 2015.


    Hastie, Reid 2015. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making.


    Hertwig, Ralph 2015. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making.


    Johnson, Eric D. and Tubau, Elisabet 2015. Comprehension and computation in Bayesian problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,


    Juslin, Peter Lindskog, Marcus and Mayerhofer, Bastian 2015. Is there something special with probabilities? – Insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk combination. Cognition, Vol. 136, p. 282.


    ×

The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Descriptive, normative, and methodological challenges

  • Jonathan J. Koehler (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041157
  • Published online: 01 February 2010
Abstract
Abstract

We have been oversold on the base rate fallacy in probabilistic judgment from an empirical, normative, and methodological standpoint. At the empirical level, a thorough examination of the base rate literature (including the famous lawyer–engineer problem) does not support the conventional wisdom that people routinely ignore base rates. Quite the contrary, the literature shows that base rates are almost always used and that their degree of use depends on task structure and representation. Specifically, base rates play a relatively larger role in tasks where base rates are implicitly learned or can be represented in frequentist terms. Base rates are also used more when they are reliable and relatively more diagnostic than available individuating information. At the normative level, the base rate fallacy should be rejected because few tasks map unambiguously into the narrow framework that is held up as the standard of good decision making. Mechanical applications of Bayes's theorem to identify performance errors are inappropriate when (1) key assumptions of the model are either unchecked or grossly violated, and (2) no attempt is made to identify the decision maker's goals, values, and task assumptions. Methodologically, the current approach is criticized for its failure to consider how the ambiguous, unreliable, and unstable base rates of the real world are and should be used. Where decision makers' assumptions and goals vary, and where performance criteria are complex, the traditional Bayesian standard is insufficient. Even where predictive accuracy is the goal in commonly defined problems, there may be situations (e.g., informationally redundant environments) in which base rates can be ignored with impunity. A more ecologically valid research program is called for. This program should emphasize the development of prescriptive theory in rich, realistic decision environments.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. G. Adair (1984) The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact, Journal of Applied Psychology 69:334–45. [aJJK]

J. E. Adler (1994) More on race and crime. Journal of Social Philosophy 25:105–14. [JEA]

I. Ajzen (1977) Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base-rate information on prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35:303–13. [aJJK]

R. H. Ashton (1986) Combining the judgments of experts: How many and which ones? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 38:405–14. [VLQ]

F. Bacchus , H. E. Kyburg & M. Thalos (1990) Against conditionalization. Synthese 85:475506. [HEK]

M. Bar-Hillel (1980) The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica 44:211–33. [aJJK, SEE, CCRM]

M. Bar-Hillel & B. Fischhoff (1981) When do base rates affect predictions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41:671–80. [aJJK]

D. Bar-tal , C. G. Cravmann , A. W. Kruglanski & W. Stroebe (1989) Stereotyping and prejudice: Changing conceptions. Springer-Verlag. [DCF]

R. F. Baumeister & L. S. Newman (1994) Self-regulation of cognitive inference and decision processes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20:319. [PF–B]

L. R. Beach & T. R. Mitchell (1987) Image theory: Principles, goals, and plans in decision making. Acta Psychologica 66:201–20. [KMG]

P. Beck , I. Solomon & L. Tomassini (1985) Subjective prior probability distributions and audit risk. Jotimal of Accounting Research 23:3756. [LK]

R. Beyth-Marom & H. R. Arkes (1983) Being accurate but not necessarily Bayesian: Comments on Christensen-Szalanski and Beach. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 31:255–57. [SEE]

R. Beyth-Marom & B. Fischoff (1983) Diagnosticity and pseudodiagnosticity. Journal of Personality and Sodal Psychology 45:1185–95. [aJJK, YK]

M. Biernat (1993) Gender and height: Developmental patterns in knowledge and use of an accurate stereotype. Sex Roles 29:691713. [aJJK, JK]

M. H. Birnbaum (1983) Base rates in Bayesian inference: Signal detection analysis of the cab problem. American Journal of Psychology 96:8593. [aJJK]

M. H. Bimbaum & B. A. Mellers (1983) Bayesian inference: Combining base rates with opinions of sources who vary in credibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45:792803. [aJJK]

N. Brekke & E. Borgida (1988) Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55:372–86. [aJJK]

J. Butt (1988) Frequency judgments in an auditing-related task. Jotimal of Accounting Research 26:315–30. [aJJK, LK]

B. J. Calder , L. W. Phillips & A. M. Tybout (1981) Designing research for application. Journal of Consumer Research 8:197207. [rJJK]

R. A. Caldwell , G. A. Bogat & W. S. Davidson (1988) The assessment of child abuse potential and the prevention of child abuse and neglect: A policy analysis. American Journal of Community Psychology 16:609–24. [aJJK]

C. K. Cannon & V. L. Quinsey (1995) The likelihood of violent behaviour: Predictions, postdictions, and hindsight bias. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 27:92106. [VLQ]

W. Casscells , A. Schoenberger & T. B. Graboys (1978) Interpretations by physicians of clinical laboratory results. New England journal of Medicine 299:991001. [aJJK]

L. G. Chapman & J. P. Chapman (1959) Atmosphere effect re-exainined. journal of Experimental Psychology 58:220–26. [aJJK]

J. J. J. Christensen-Szalanski & L. R. Beach (1982) Experience and the baserate fallacy. Organization Behavior and Human Performance 29:270–78. [aJJK, SEE]

J. J. J. Christensen-Szalanski & L. R. Beach (1984) The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature. American Psychologist 39:7578. [aJJK, NHA]

L. J. Cohen (1977) The probable and the provable. Clarendon. [CDK]

L. J. Cohen (1979) On the psychology of prediction: Whose is the fallacy? Cognition 7:385407. [aJJK]

L. J. Cohen (1986a) Twelve questions about Keynes's concept of weight. The British journal for the Philosophy of Science 37:263–78. [LJC]

L. Cosmides (1989) The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Cognition 31:187276. [FRP]

L. J. Cronbach (1975) Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology. American Psychologist 30:116–27. [CK]

R. M. Dawes , D. Faust & P. E. Meehl (1989) Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science 243:1668–73. [aJJK, VLQ]

R. M. Dawes , H. L. Mirels , E. Cold & E. Donahue (1993) Equating inverse probabilities in implicit personality judgments. Psychological Science 4:396400. [aJJK]

D. Dubois & H. Prade (1988) Possibility theory. Plenum. [LRG]

D. Duncan & W. C. Snow (1987) Base rates in neuropsychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 18:368–70. [aJJK]

B. Duthie & K. R. Vincent (1986) Diagnostic hit rates of high point codes for the diagnostic inventory of personality and symptoms using random assignment, base rates, and probability scales. Journal of Clinical Psychology 42:612–14. [aJJK]

D. M. Eddy (1982) Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, ed. D. Ktihneman , P. Slovic & A. Tversky . Cambridge University Press. [aJJK]

S. E. Edgell & J. E. Hennessey (1980) Irrelevant information and utilization of event base rates in nonmetric multiple-cue probability learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 26:16. [SEE]

W. Edwards (1990) Unfinished tasks: A research agenda for behavioral decision theory. In: Insights in decision making, ed. R. M. Hogarth . University of Chicago Press. [aJJK]

J. St. B. T. Evans & H. Bradshaw (1986) Estimating sample-size requirements in research design: A study of intuitive statistical judgment. Current Psychological Research and Reviews 5:1019. [arJJK]

I. W. Evett (1986) A Bayesian approach to the problem of interpreting glass evidence in forensic science casework. Journal of the Forensic Science Society 26:318. [aJJK]

M. Finkelstein & W. Fairly (1970) A Baysesian approach to identification evidence. Harvard Law Review 83:489517. [aJJK]

B. Fischoff & M. Bar-Hillel (1984) Diagnosticity and the base-rate effect. Memory and Cognition 12:402–10. [aJJK]

B. Fischoff & R. Beyth-Marom (1983) Hypothesis evaluation from a Bayesian perspective. Psychological Review 90:239–60. [arJJK]

B. FischofT , P. Slovic & S. Lichtenstein (1979) Subjective sensitivity analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 23:339–59. [aJJK, NHA]

G. T. Fong , D. H. Krantz & R. E. Nisbett (1986) The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology 18:253–92. [aJJK]

M. Fuller & P. J. McLeod (1995) Judgements of control over a contingently responsive animation by students with and without learning disabilities. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 27(2):171–86. [PJM]

D. C. Funder (1987) Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment1. Psychological Bulletin 101:7590. [aJJK]

D. C. Funder (1993) Judgments as data from personality and developmental psychology: Error versus accuracy. In: Studying lives through time: Approaches to personality and development, ed. D. C. Funder , R. Parke , C. Tomlinson-Keasey & K. Widaman . American Psychological Association. [aJJK]

W. K. Gabrenya & R. M. Arkin (1979) Motivation, heuristics, and the psychology of prediction. Motivation and Emotion 3:117. [aJJK, FRP]

K. M. Galotti (1989) Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 105:331–51. [KMG]

I. Gavanski & C. Hui (1992). Natural sample spaces and uncertain belief. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63:766–80. [aJJK, YK]

G. Gigerenzer (1991) How to make cognitive illusions disappear: Beyond “heuristic and biases.” European Review of Social Psychology 2:83115. [aJJK, PF-B]

T. Gilovich , R. Vallone & A. Tversky (1985) The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences. Cognitive Psychology 17:295313. [aJJK]

Z. Ginossar & Y. Trope (1987) Problem solving in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52:464–73. [arJJK]

M. A. Gluck & C. Bower (1988) From conditioning to category learning: An adaptive network model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 117:227–47. [PF-B, BAS]

A. S. Goodie & E. Fantino (1995) An experientially derived base-rate error in humans. Psychological Science 6:101–6. [BAS]

J. D. Graham (1989) Communicating about chemical hazards. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 8:307–13. [LRG]

D. M. Grether (1980) Bayes rule as a descriptive model: The representativeness heuristic. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 95:537–57. [aJJK]

R. M. Hamm (1993) Explanations for common responses to the blue/green cab probabilistic inference word problem Psychological Reports 72:219–42. [arJJK]

G. T. Harris , M. E. Rice & V. L. Quinsey (1993) Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders: The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behavior 20:315–35. [VLQ]

J. L. Hilton & S. Fein (1989) The role of diagnosticity in stereotype-based judgments. journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57:201–11. [aJJK, JK]

V. B. Hinsz , R. S. Tindale , D. H. Nagao , J. H. Davis & B. A. Robertson (1988) The influence of the accuracy of individuating information on the use of base rate information in probability judgment. Journal of Experimentnl Social Psychology 24:127–45. [aJJK]

D. L. Hintzman , C. Nozawa & M. Irmscher (1982) Frequency as a nonpropositional attribute of memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21:127–41. [aJJK]

K. J. Holyoak & B. A. Spellman (1993) Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology 44:265315. [aJJK, PF-B, BAS]

S. K. Jones , K. T. Jones & D. Frisch (1995) Biases of probability assessment: A comparison of frequency and single case judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 61:109–22. [rJJK]

E. Joyce & G. Biddle (1981) Are auditors' judgments sufficiently regressive? Journal of Accounting Research 19:323–49. [aJJK, LK]

D. Kahneman (1991) Judgment and decision making: A personal view. Psychological Science 2:142–45. [BJG]

D. Kahneman & D. Lovallo (1993) Bold forecasting and timid decisions: A cognitive perspective on risk taking. Management Science 39:1731. [rJJK]

D. Kahneman & A. Tversky (1973) On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review 80:237–51. [aJJK, DCF, GK, GDK, LK, YK, PJM]

T. Kida (1984) The effect of causality and specificity on data use. Journal of Accounting Research 22:145–52. [LK]

Y. Klar (1990) Linking structures and sensitivity to judgment-relevant information in statistical and logical reasoning tasks. Jou mal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:841–58. [YK]

G. A. Klein , J. Orasanu , R. Calderwood & C. E. Zsambok (1993). Decision making in action: Models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex. [KJV]

G. D. Kleiter (1992) Bayesian diagnosis in expert systems. Artificial Intelligence 54:132. [GDK]

G. D. Kleiter (1994a) Natural sampling: Rationality without base rates. In: Contributions to mathematical psychology, psychometrics and methodology, ed. C. Fischer & D. Laming . Springer-Verlag. [GDK]

J. J. Koehler (1993d) The influence of prior beliefs on scientific judgments of evidence quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 56:2855. [aJJK]

J. J. Koehler , B. J. Gibbs & R. M. Hogarth (1994) Shattering the illusion of control: Multi-shot versus single-shot gambles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7:183–91. [aJJK]

J. Krueger & M. Rothbart (1988) Use of categorical and individuating information in making inferences about personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55:187–95. [aJJK, JK]

E. J. Langer (1975) The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32:311–28. [aJJK]

D. R. Lehman , R. O. Lempert & R. E. Nisbett (1988) The effects of graduate training on reasoning: formal discipline and thinking about every-day life events. American Psychologist 43:431–42. [aJJK]

R. Labby (1985) Availability and the generation of hypotheses in analytical review. Journal of Accounting Research 23:648–67. [LK]

R. Libby & D. Frederick (1990) Experience and the ability to explain audit findings. Journal of Accounting Research 28:348–67. [LK]

S. T. Lindeman , W. P. Van Den Brink & J. Hoogstraten (1988) Effect of feedback on base-rate utilization. Perceptual and Motor Skilk 67:343–50. [aJJK]

D. V. LindJey (1982) Scoring rules and the inevitability of probability. International Statistical Review 50:126. [LRG]

A. Locksley , E. Borgida , N. Brekke & C. Hepburn (1980) Sex stereotypes and social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:821–31. [aJJK, JK, CM]

L. L. Lopes (1987) Procedural debiasing. Ada Psychologica 64:167–85. [aJJK]

L. L. Lopes (1991) The rhetoric of irrationality. Theory and Psychology 1:65.82. [aJJK]

J. C. Lynch & C. Ofir (1989) Effects of cue consistency and value on base-rate utilization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56:170–81. [aJJK, NPM]

D. Lyon & P. Slovic (1976) Dominance of accuracy information and neglect of base rates in probability estimation. Ada Psychologica 40:287–98. [aJJK]

L. Macchi (1995) Pragmatic aspects of the base-rate fallacy. Quarterly Journal of xperimental Psychology 48A(1):188207. [aJJK]

M. Manis , I. Dovalina , N. E. Avis & S. Cardoze (1980) Base rates can affect individual predictions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38:231–48. [aJJK, SEE, BAS]

M. Manis (1981) Reply to Bar-Hillel and Fischoff1. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 41:681–83. [aJJK]

C. McCauley , C. L. Stitt & M. Segal (1980). Stereotyping: From prejudice to prediction. Psychological Bulletin 87:195208. [CM]

L. McDaniel (1990) The effects of time pressure and audit program structure on audit performance1. Journal of Accounting Research 28:267–87. [LK]

C. R. M. McKenzie (1994a) The accuracy of intuitive judgment strategies: Covariation assessment and Bayesian inference. Cognitive Psychology 26:209–39. [arJJK]

D. L. Medin & J. G. Bettger (1991) Sensitivity to changes in base-rate information. American Journal of Psychology 104:311–32. [aJJK]

P. E. Meehl & A. Rosen (1955) Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. Psychological Bulletin 52:194216. [aJJK]

N. Moray (1959) Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 11:5660. [KJV]

D. Navon (1978) The importance of being conservative: Some reflections on human Bayesian behavior. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 31:3348. [aJJK]

C. Nesson (1985) The evidence or the event? On judicial proof and the acceptability of verdicts. Harvard Law Review 98:13571392. [aJJK]

R. E. Nisbett & E. Borgida (1975) Attribution and the psychology of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32:932–43. [arJJK, PDW]

R. E. Nisbett , E. Borgida , R. Crandall & H. Reed (1982) Popular induction: Information is not necessarily informative. Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, ed. D. Kahneman , P. Slovic & A. Tversky . Cambridge University Press. [aJJK]

R. E. Nisbett , G. T. Fong , D. R. Lehman & P. W. Cheng (1987) Teaching reasoning. Science 238:625–31. [aJJK]

R. E. Nisbett , D. H. Krantz , C. Jepson & Z. Kunda (1983) The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning. Psychological Review 90:339–63. [aJJK]

R. E. Nisbett & S. Schachter (1966) Cognitive manipulation of pain. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2:227–36. [aJJK]

C. Ofir (1988) Pseudodiagnosticity in judgment under uncertainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 42:343–63. [aJJK]

J. W. Payne , J. R. Bettman & E. J. Johnson (1992) Behavioral decision research: A constructive processing perspective. Annual Review of sychology 43:87131. [aJJK]

L. D. Phillips & W. Edwards (1966). Conservatism in simple probability inference tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology 72:346–57. [NPM]

S. L. Pimm & A. Redfeam (1988). The variability of animal populations. Nature 268:329–31. [LRG]

V. L. Quinsey & R. Ambtman (1979) Variables affecting psychiatrists' and teachers' assessments of the dangerousness of mentally ill offenders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 47:353–62. [VLQ]

V. L. Quinsey & M. Cyr (1986) Perceived dangerousness and treatability of offenders: The effects of internal versus external attributions of crime causality. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 1:458—71. [VLQ]

V. L. Quinsey & A. Maguire (1986) Maximum security psychiatric patients: Actuarial and clinical prediction of dangerousness. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 1:143—71. [VLQ]

A. S. Reber (1993) The cognitive unconscious: An evolutionary perspective. Consciousness and Cognition 1:93133. [BAS]

D. A. Schum & A. W. Martin (1982) Formal and empirical research on cascaded inference in jurisprudence. Law and Society Review 17:105–51. [aJJK]

C. A. Seger (1994) Implicit learning. Psychological Bulletin 115:163–96. [BAS]

D. R. Shanks (1992) Connectionist accounts of the inverse base-rate effect in categorization. Connection Science 4:318. [PF-B]

P. Slovic , B. Fischhoff & S. Uchtenstein (1977) Behavioral decision theory. Annual Review of Psychology 28:139. [NHA]

P. Slovic & S. Lichtenstein (1971) Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment. Organization Behavior and Human Performance 6:649743. [aJJK]

R. Swieringa & M. Gibbins , L. Larsson & J. Sweeney (1976) Experiments in the heuristics of human information processing. Journal of Accounting 14:159–87. [aJJK]

J. K. Swim (1994) Perceived versus meta-analytic effect sizes: An assessment of the accuracy of gender stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66:2136. [DCF]

P. E. Tetlock (1992b) Is it a bad idea to study good judgment? Political Psychology 13:429–34. [CJT]

J. T. Todd & E. K. Morris (1992) Case histories in the great power of steady misrepresentation. American Psychologist 47:1441–53. [aJJK]

L. Tomassini , I. Solomon , M. Romney & J. Krogstad (1982) Calibration of auditors' probabilistic judgments: Some empirical evidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 30:391406. [LK]

L. H. Tribe (1971) Trial by mathematics: Precision and ritual in the legal process. Harvard Law Review 84:1329–93. [aJJK]

A. Tversky & D. Kahneman (1971) Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychological Bulletin 76:105–10. [aJJK, SEE]

A. Tversky (1982a) Evidential impact of base rates. In: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, ed. D. Kahneman , P. Slovic & A. Tversky . Cambridge University Press. [aJJK, BAS]

A. Tversky (1982b) Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases In: Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, ed. D. Kahneman , P. Slovic & A. Tversky . Cambridge University Press. [LRG]

S. Ungar & A. Shev'er (1989) ‘Say it ain't so, Ben’: Attributions for a fallen hero. Social Psychology Quarterly 52:207–12. [aJJK]

K. J. Vicente & W. F. Brewer (1993). Reconstructive remembering of the scientific literature. Cognition 46:101–28. [KJV]

W. A. Wagenaar (1988) The proper seat: A Bayesian discussion of the position of expert witnesses. Law and Human Behavior 12:499510. [aJJK]

J. B. Watson & R. Rayner (1920) Conditioned emotional reactions1. Journal of Experimental Psychology 3:115. [KJV]

C. L. Wells (1992) Naked statistical evidence of liability: Is subjective probability enough? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62:739–52. [PDW]

G. L. Wells & J. H. Harvey (1977) Do people use consensus information in making causal attributions? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35:279–93. [aJJK, JK, PDW]

G. L. Wells (1978) Naive attributors' attributions and predictions: What is informative and when is an effect an effect? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36:483–90. [aJJK, GK]

W. G. Willis (1984) Reanalysis of an actuarial approach to neuropsychological diagnosis in consideration of base rates. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 52:567–67. [aJJK]

C. R. Wolfe (1995) Information seeking on Bayesian conditioned probability problems: A fuzzy-trace theory account. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 8:85108. [aJJK]

H. Zukier & A. Pepitone (1984) Social roles and strategies in prediction: Some determinants of the use of base-rate information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47:349–60. [aJJK]

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: