Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 284
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Adlof, Suzanne Frishkoff, Gwen Dandy, Jennifer and Perfetti, Charles 2016. Effects of induced orthographic and semantic knowledge on subsequent learning: a test of the partial knowledge hypothesis. Reading and Writing, Vol. 29, Issue. 3, p. 475.


    Al-Zanoon, Noor Dambacher, Michael and Kuperman, Victor 2016. Evidence for a global oculomotor program in reading. Psychological Research,


    D’Mello, Sidney K. 2016. Giving Eyesight to the Blind: Towards Attention-Aware AIED. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, Vol. 26, Issue. 2, p. 645.


    de Leeuw, Linda Segers, Eliane and Verhoeven, Ludo 2016. The Effect of Student-Related and Text-Related Characteristics on Student’s Reading Behaviour and Text Comprehension: An Eye Movement Study. Scientific Studies of Reading, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 248.


    Fischer-Baum, Simon and Englebretson, Robert 2016. Orthographic units in the absence of visual processing: Evidence from sublexical structure in braille. Cognition, Vol. 153, p. 161.


    Goldinger, Stephen D. Papesh, Megan H. Barnhart, Anthony S. Hansen, Whitney A. and Hout, Michael C. 2016. The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,


    Heinzle, Jakob Aponte, Eduardo A and Stephan, Klaas Enno 2016. Computational models of eye movements and their application to schizophrenia. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 11, p. 21.


    Henderson, John M. Choi, Wonil Lowder, Matthew W. and Ferreira, Fernanda 2016. Language structure in the brain: A fixation-related fMRI study of syntactic surprisal in reading. NeuroImage, Vol. 132, p. 293.


    Kim, Esther S. and Lemke, Shannon F. 2016. Behavioural and eye-movement outcomes in response to text-based reading treatment for acquired alexia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 60.


    Korinth, Sebastian Peter Dimigen, Olaf Sommer, Werner and Breznitz, Zvia 2016. Reading training by means of disappearing text: effects on reading performance and eye movements. Reading and Writing, Vol. 29, Issue. 6, p. 1245.


    Kuperman, Victor Van Dyke, Julie A. and Henry, Regina 2016. Eye-Movement Control in RAN and Reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, Vol. 20, Issue. 2, p. 173.


    Liversedge, Simon P. Drieghe, Denis Li, Xin Yan, Guoli Bai, Xuejun and Hyönä, Jukka 2016. Universality in eye movements and reading: A trilingual investigation. Cognition, Vol. 147, p. 1.


    Marx, Christina Hutzler, Florian Schuster, Sarah and Hawelka, Stefan 2016. On the Development of Parafoveal Preprocessing: Evidence from the Incremental Boundary Paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,


    Mock, J. Huber, S. Klein, E. and Moeller, K. 2016. Insights into numerical cognition: considering eye-fixations in number processing and arithmetic. Psychological Research, Vol. 80, Issue. 3, p. 334.


    O'Brien, Edward J. and Cook, Anne E. 2016.


    Sheridan, Heather and Reichle, Erik D. 2016. An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading. Cognitive Science, Vol. 40, Issue. 3, p. 522.


    Sheridan, Heather Reichle, Erik D. and Reingold, Eyal M. 2016. Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,


    Silva, Susana Faísca, Luís Araújo, Susana Casaca, Luis Carvalho, Loide Petersson, Karl Magnus and Reis, Alexandra 2016. Too little or too much? Parafoveal preview benefits and parafoveal load costs in dyslexic adults. Annals of Dyslexia, Vol. 66, Issue. 2, p. 187.


    Spichtig, Alexandra N. Hiebert, Elfrieda H. Vorstius, Christian Pascoe, Jeffrey P. David Pearson, P. and Radach, Ralph 2016. The Decline of Comprehension-Based Silent Reading Efficiency in the United States: A Comparison of Current Data With Performance in 1960. Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 51, Issue. 2, p. 239.


    Wallot, Sebastian 2016. Understanding reading as a form of language-use: A language game hypothesis. New Ideas in Psychology, Vol. 42, p. 21.


    ×

The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models

  • Erik D. Reichle (a1), Keith Rayner (a2) and Alexander Pollatsek (a3)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X03000104
  • Published online: 01 August 2003
Abstract

The E-Z Reader model (Reichle et al. 1998; 1999) provides a theoretical framework for understanding how word identification, visual processing, attention, and oculomotor control jointly determine when and where the eyes move during reading. In this article, we first review what is known about eye movements during reading. Then we provide an updated version of the model (E-Z Reader 7) and describe how it accounts for basic findings about eye movement control in reading. We then review several alternative models of eye movement control in reading, discussing both their core assumptions and their theoretical scope. On the basis of this discussion, we conclude that E-Z Reader provides the most comprehensive account of eye movement control during reading. Finally, we provide a brief overview of what is known about the neural systems that support the various components of reading, and suggest how the cognitive constructs of our model might map onto this neural architecture.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: