Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Access
  • Cited by 320
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Arbib, Michael A. 2016. Towards a Computational Comparative Neuroprimatology: Framing the language-ready brain. Physics of Life Reviews, Vol. 16, p. 1.


    Bánréti, Zoltán Hoffmann, Ildikó and Vincze, Veronika 2016. Recursive Subsystems in Aphasia and Alzheimer's Disease: Case Studies in Syntax and Theory of Mind. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,


    Blevins, James P. Ackerman, Farrell and Malouf, Robert 2016. Morphological Metatheory.


    Christensen, Peer Fusaroli, Riccardo and Tylén, Kristian 2016. Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization. Cognition, Vol. 146, p. 67.


    Corballis, Michael C. 2016. Precursors to Language. Topoi,


    Corballis, Michael C. 2016. The evolution of language: Sharing our mental lives. Journal of Neurolinguistics,


    de Boer, Bart 2016. Modeling Co-evolution of Speech and Biology. Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 459.


    Elder, Chi-Hé and Jaszczolt, Kasia M. 2016. Towards a pragmatic category of conditionals. Journal of Pragmatics, Vol. 98, p. 36.


    Everett, Daniel L. 2016. An Evaluation of Universal Grammar and the Phonological Mind1. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,


    Fedzechkina, Maryia Newport, Elissa L. and Jaeger, T. Florian 2016. Balancing Effort and Information Transmission During Language Acquisition: Evidence From Word Order and Case Marking. Cognitive Science, p. n/a.


    Floyd, Simeon Manrique, Elizabeth Rossi, Giovanni and Torreira, Francisco 2016. Timing of Visual Bodily Behavior in Repair Sequences: Evidence From Three Languages. Discourse Processes, Vol. 53, Issue. 3, p. 175.


    Gatt, Albert and Portet, François 2016. Multilingual generation of uncertain temporal expressions from data: A study of a possibilistic formalism and its consistency with human subjective evaluations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 285, p. 73.


    Goldberg, Adele E. 2016. Subtle Implicit Language Facts Emerge from the Functions of Constructions. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,


    Gustison, Morgan L. Semple, Stuart Ferrer-i-Cancho, Ramon and Bergman, Thore J. 2016. Gelada vocal sequences follow Menzerath’s linguistic law. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue. 19, p. E2750.


    Hammarström, Harald 2016. Linguistic diversity and language evolution. Journal of Language Evolution, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 19.


    Jaszczolt, Katarzyna M. 2016. Conceptualizations of Time.


    Kemmerer, David 2016. Categories of object concepts across languages and brains: the relevance of nominal classification systems to cognitive neuroscience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, p. 1.


    Klinger, Jörn Mayor, Julien and Bannard, Colin 2016. Children's Faithfulness in Imitating Language Use Varies Cross-Culturally, Contingent on Prior Experience. Child Development, Vol. 87, Issue. 3, p. 820.


    Kravchenko, A.V. 2016. Two views on language ecology and ecolinguistics. Language Sciences, Vol. 54, p. 102.


    LaPolla, Randy J. 2016. Evans, Vyvyan. 2014.The language myth: Why language is not an instinct.. Studies in Language, Vol. 40, Issue. 1, p. 235.


    ×

The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science

  • Nicholas Evans (a1) and Stephen C. Levinson (a2)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999094X
  • Published online: 26 October 2009
Abstract
Abstract

Talk of linguistic universals has given cognitive scientists the impression that languages are all built to a common pattern. In fact, there are vanishingly few universals of language in the direct sense that all languages exhibit them. Instead, diversity can be found at almost every level of linguistic organization. This fundamentally changes the object of enquiry from a cognitive science perspective. This target article summarizes decades of cross-linguistic work by typologists and descriptive linguists, showing just how few and unprofound the universal characteristics of language are, once we honestly confront the diversity offered to us by the world's 6,000 to 8,000 languages. After surveying the various uses of “universal,” we illustrate the ways languages vary radically in sound, meaning, and syntactic organization, and then we examine in more detail the core grammatical machinery of recursion, constituency, and grammatical relations. Although there are significant recurrent patterns in organization, these are better explained as stable engineering solutions satisfying multiple design constraints, reflecting both cultural-historical factors and the constraints of human cognition.

Linguistic diversity then becomes the crucial datum for cognitive science: we are the only species with a communication system that is fundamentally variable at all levels. Recognizing the true extent of structural diversity in human language opens up exciting new research directions for cognitive scientists, offering thousands of different natural experiments given by different languages, with new opportunities for dialogue with biological paradigms concerned with change and diversity, and confronting us with the extraordinary plasticity of the highest human skills.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science
      Your Kindle email address
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

K. Aoki & M. W Feldman . (1989) Pleiotropy and preadaptation in the evolution of human language capacity. Theoretical Population Biology 35:181–94.

K. Aoki & M. W Feldman . (1994) Cultural transmission of a sign language when deafness is caused by recessive alleles at two independent loci. Theoretical Population Biology 45:253–61.

M. A Arbib . (2005) From monkey-like action recognition to human language: An evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(2):105–24.

Q. D. Atkinson , A. Meade , C. Venditti , S. Greenhill & M Pagel . (2008) Languages evolve in punctuational bursts. Science: 319(5863):588.

M. C Baker . (2001) Atoms of language: The mind's hidden rules of grammar. Basic Books.

M. C Baker . (2003) Linguistic differences and language design. Trends in Cognitive Science 7:349–53.

J. Barwise & R Cooper . (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4:159219.

E. Bates , A. Devescovi & B Wulfeck . (2001) Psycholinguistics: A cross-language perspective. Annual Review of Psychology 52:369–96.

K. Baynes & M Gazzaniga . (2005) Lateralization of language: Toward a biologically based model of language. The Linguistic Review 22:303–26.

J. Bohnemeyer & P Brown . (2007) Standing divided: Dispositional verbs and locative predications in two Mayan languages. Linguistics 45 (5/6):1105–51.

L Boroditsky . (2001) Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43(1):122.

N Chomsky . (1955) Logical syntax and semantics: Their linguistic relevance. Language 31(1):3645.

M. H. Christiansen & S Kirby . (2003) Language evolution. Oxford University Press.

K. Christianson & F Ferreira . (2005) Conceptual accessibility and sentence production in a free word order language (Odawa). Cognition 98:105–35.

S Chung . (1989) On the notion “null anaphor” in Chamorro. In: The null subject parameter, ed. O. Jaeggli & K. Safir , pp. 143–84. Kluwer.

W Croft . (2001) Radical construction grammar. Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford University Press.

A. Cutler , J. Mehler , D. Norris & J Segui . (1989) Limits on bilingualism. Nature 340:229–30.

J. Davidoff , I. Davies & D Roberson . (1999) Color categories of a stone-age tribe. Nature 398:203204.

A. Dench & N Evans . (1988) Multiple case-marking in Australian languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 8(1):147.

M. Dunn , S. C. Levinson , E. Lindström , G. Reesink & A Terrill . (2008) Structural phylogeny in historical linguistics: Methodological explorations applied in Island Melanesia. Language 84(4):710–59.

M. Dunn , A. Terrill , G. Reesink , R. Foley & S. C Levinson . (2005) Structural phylogenetics and the reconstruction of ancient language history. Science 309:2072–75.

N Evans . (1995a) A grammar of Kayardild. Mouton de Gruyter.

N Evans . (2003b) Context, culture and structuration in the languages of Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology 32:1340.

N. Evans & H.-J Sasse ., eds. (2002) Problems of polysynthesis. Akademie.

D. L Everett . (2005) Cultural constraints on grammar and cognition in Pirahã. Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology 46:621–46.

W. T. Fitch , M. D. Hauser & N Chomsky . (2005) The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition 97:179210.

A François . (2005) A typological overview of Mwotlap, an Oceanic language of Vanuatu. Linguistic Typology 9(1):115–46.

A Friederici . (2004) Processing local transitions versus long-distance syntactic hierarchies. Trends in Cognitive Science 8:245–47.

L Gleitman . (1990) The structural sources of verb meanings. Language Acquisition 1:355.

P Gordon . (2004) Numerical cognition without words: Evidence from Amazonia. Science 306(5695):496–99.

R. D. Gray & Q. D Atkinson . (2003) Language-tree divergence times support the Anatolian theory of Indo-European origin. Nature 426:435–39.

J. H. Greenberg ed. (1986) On being a linguistic anthropologist. Annual Review of Anthropology 15:124.

P Hagoort . (2005) On Broca, brain and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Science 9:416–23.

K. L Hale . (1983) Warlpiri and the grammar of non-configurational languages. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 1:547.

M Haspelmath . (1993) A grammar of Lezgian [Mouton Grammar Library, 9]. Mouton de Gruyter.

M Haspelmath . (1999) Optimality and diachronic adaptation. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 18(2):180205.

M Haspelmath . (2007) Pre-established categories don't exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11(1):119–32.

M. D. Hauser , N. Chomsky & W. T Fitch . (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it and how did it evolve? Science 298(5598):1569–79.

K Hengeveld . (1992) Parts of speech. In: Layered structure and reference in a functional perspective, ed. M. Fortescue , P. Harder & L. Kristofferson , pp. 2956. John Benjamins.

N Himmelmann . (1997) Deiktikon, Artikel, Nominalphrase, Zur Emergenz Syntaktischer Struktur. Niemeyer.

R Jackendoff . (2002) Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford University Press.

P. Kay & W Kempton . (1984) What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? American Anthropologist 86:6579.

S. Knecht , M. Deppe , B. Dräger , L. Bobe , H. Lohmann , E.-B. Ringelstein & H Henningsen . (2000) Language lateralization in healthy right-handers. Brain 123(1):7481.

J. Koster & R May . (1982) On the constituency of infinitives. Language 58:116–43.

P. K Kuhl . (2004) Early language acquisition: Cracking the speech code. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5:831–43.

B. Landau & R Jackendoff . (1993) “What” and “where” in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16:217–65.

W. J. M Levelt . (2008) Formal grammars in linguistics and psycholinguistics, vol.1-3. Benjamins.

S. C. Levinson & S Meira . (2003) “Natural concepts” in the spatial topological domain – adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective: An exercise in semantic typology. Language 79(3):485516.

P. Li & L. R Gleitman . (2002) Turning the tables: Language and spatial reasoning. Cognition 83(3):265–94.

R. Mace & M Pagel . (1995) A latitudinal gradient in the density of human languages in North America. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 261:117–21.

A. MacLarnon & G Hewitt . (2004) Increased breathing control: another factor in the evolution of human language. Evolutionary Anthropology 13:181–97.

M. MacSweeney , B. Woll , R. Campbell , P. K. McGuire , A. S. David , C. R. Williams , J. Suckling , G. A. Calvert & M. J Brammer . (2002) Neural systems underlying British Sign Language and audio-visual English processing in native users. Brain 125:1583–93.

E. Maguire , D. Gadian , I Johnsrude , D. Good , J. Ashburner , R. Frackowiak & C Frith . (2000) Navigation-related structural changes in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. PNAS 97(8):43984403.

A. Majid , M. Bowerman , S. Kita , D. B. Haun & S. C Levinson . (2004) Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Science 8(3):108–14.

M Mithun . (1984) How to avoid subordination. Berkeley Linguistic Society 10:493509.

F. J Newmeyer . (1986) Linguistic theory in America, 2nd edition. Academic Press.

J Nichols . (1992) Language diversity in space and time. University of Chicago Press.

H. Nishimura , K. Hashikawa , K. Doi , T. Iwaki , Y. Watanabe , H. Kusuoka , T. Nishimura & T Kubo . (1999) Sign language “heard” in the auditory cortex. Nature 397(6715):116.

R. Nordlinger & L Sadler . (2004) Nominal tense in crosslinguistic perspective. Language 80:776806.

T. O'Donnell , M. Hauser & W. T Fitch . (2005) Using mathematical models of language experimentally. Trends in Cognitive Science 9:284–89.

C. Padden & D Perlmutter . (1987) American Sign Language and the architecture of phonological theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5:335–75.

M. Pagel , Q. D. Atkinson & A Meade . (2007) Frequency of word-use predicts rates of lexical evolution throughout Indo-European history. Nature 449:717–20.

A Parker . (2006) Evolving the narrow language faculty: Was recursion the pivotal step? In: The evolution of language. Proceedings of the 6th international conference on the evolution of language, ed. A. Cangelosi , A. D. M. Smith & K. Smith , pp. 239–46. World Scientific Press.

B. H Partee . (1995) Quantificational structures and compositionality. In: Quantification in natural languages, ed. E. Bach , E. Jelinek , A. Kratzer & B. H. Partee , pp. 541602. Kluwer.

R. Port & A Leary . (2005) Against formal phonology. Language 81:927–64.

W. Sandler , I. Meir , C. Padden & M Aronoff . (2005) The emergence of grammar in a new sign language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102(7):2661–65.

A. Senghas , S. Kita & A Özyürek . (2004) Children creating core properties of language: Evidence from an emerging sign language in Nicaragua. Science 305(5691):1779–82.

L. Steels & T Belpaeme . (2005) Coordinating perceptually grounded categories through language: A case study for colour. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28:469529.

E. C. Teeling , M. S. Springer , O. Madsen , P. Bates , S. J. O'Brien & W. J Murphy . (2005) A molecular phylogeny for bats illuminates biogeography and the fossil record. Science 307:580–84.

M Tomasello . (1995) Language is not an instinct. Cognitive Development 10:131–56.

G. Vigliocco , D. P. Vinson , F. Paganelli & K Dworzynski . (2005) Grammatical gender effects on cognition: Implications for language learning and language use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134:501–20.

J. D. Wall & S. K. Kim (2007) Inconsistencies in Neanderthal genomic DNA sequences. PLoS Genetics 3 (10):e175.

J. F. Werker & R. C Tees . (2005) Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Developmental Psychobiology 46(3):233–51.

U Zeshan . (2002) Indo-Pakistani sign language grammar: A typological outline. Sign Language Studies 3(2):157212.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: