Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 921
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Badets, Arnaud Koch, Iring and Philipp, Andrea M. 2016. A review of ideomotor approaches to perception, cognition, action, and language: advancing a cultural recycling hypothesis. Psychological Research, Vol. 80, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Boyer, Ty W. and Bertenthal, Bennett I. 2016. Infants' observation of others' actions: Brief movement-specific visual experience primes motor representations. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, Vol. 34, Issue. 1, p. 38.

    Brandt, Valerie Cathérine Patalay, Praveetha Bäumer, Tobias Brass, Marcel and Münchau, Alexander 2016. Tics as a model of over-learned behavior-imitation and inhibition of facial tics. Movement Disorders,

    Butz, Martin V. 2016. Toward a Unified Sub-symbolic Computational Theory of Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,

    Carraro, Luciana Castelli, Luigi and Negri, Paolo 2016. The hand in motion of liberals and conservatives reveals the differential processing of positive and negative information. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 168, p. 78.

    Classen, Claudia and Kibele, Armin 2016. Action induction by visual perception of rotational motion. Psychological Research, Vol. 80, Issue. 5, p. 785.

    D'Angelo, Maria C. Thomson, David R. Tipper, Steven P. and Milliken, Bruce 2016. Negative priming 1985 to 2015: a measure of inhibition, the emergence of alternative accounts, and the multiple process challenge. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, p. 1.

    D'Ascenzo, Stefania Rubichi, Sandro Di Gregorio, Gianluca and Tommasi, Luca 2016. Social modulation of spatial judgment: The case of line bisection task. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 167, p. 24.

    Eckert, David and Bermeitinger, Christina 2016. Response Priming with More or Less Biological Movements as Primes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, Vol. 78, Issue. 5, p. 1414.

    Eder, Andreas B. and Dignath, David 2016. Influence of verbal instructions on effect-based action control. Psychological Research,

    Eder, Andreas B. Rothermund, Klaus and Hommel, Bernhard 2016. Commentary: Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: on the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,

    Eder, Andreas B. Pfister, Roland Dignath, David and Hommel, Bernhard 2016. Anticipatory affect during action preparation: evidence from backward compatibility in dual-task performance. Cognition and Emotion, p. 1.

    Eitam, Baruch and Tory Higgins, E 2016. From reaction (‘priming’) to motivated selection: changing conceptualizations of accessibility. Current Opinion in Psychology, Vol. 12, p. 58.

    Ferretti, Gabriele 2016. Through the forest of motor representations. Consciousness and Cognition, Vol. 43, p. 177.

    Finkbeiner, Matthew and Heathcote, Andrew 2016. Distinguishing the time- and magnitude-difference accounts of the Simon effect: Evidence from the reach-to-touch paradigm. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, Vol. 78, Issue. 3, p. 848.

    Frank, Cornelia 2016. Sport and Exercise Psychology Research.

    Frank, Cornelia Land, William M. and Schack, Thomas 2016. Perceptual-Cognitive Changes During Motor Learning: The Influence of Mental and Physical Practice on Mental Representation, Gaze Behavior, and Performance of a Complex Action. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,

    García, Adolfo M. and Ibáñez, Agustín 2016. A touch with words: Dynamic synergies between manual actions and language. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 68, p. 59.

    García, Adolfo M. and Ibáñez, Agustín 2016. Hands typing what hands do: Action–semantic integration dynamics throughout written verb production. Cognition, Vol. 149, p. 56.

    Gentsch, Antje Weber, Arne Synofzik, Matthis Vosgerau, Gottfried and Schütz-Bosbach, Simone 2016. Towards a common framework of grounded action cognition: Relating motor control, perception and cognition. Cognition, Vol. 146, p. 81.


The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning

  • Bernhard Hommel (a1) (a2), Jochen Müsseler (a2), Gisa Aschersleben (a2) and Wolfgang Prinz (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 October 2001

Traditional approaches to human information processing tend to deal with perception and action planning in isolation, so that an adequate account of the perception-action interface is still missing. On the perceptual side, the dominant cognitive view largely underestimates, and thus fails to account for, the impact of action-related processes on both the processing of perceptual information and on perceptual learning. On the action side, most approaches conceive of action planning as a mere continuation of stimulus processing, thus failing to account for the goal-directedness of even the simplest reaction in an experimental task. We propose a new framework for a more adequate theoretical treatment of perception and action planning, in which perceptual contents and action plans are coded in a common representational medium by feature codes with distal reference. Perceived events (perceptions) and to-be-produced events (actions) are equally represented by integrated, task-tuned networks of feature codes – cognitive structures we call event codes. We give an overview of evidence from a wide variety of empirical domains, such as spatial stimulus-response compatibility, sensorimotor synchronization, and ideomotor action, showing that our main assumptions are well supported by the data.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *