Skip to main content
×
Home

Thinking about kinship and thinking

  • Doug Jones (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The target article proposes a theory uniting the anthropological study of kin terminology with recent developments in linguistics and cognitive science. The response to comments reaches two broad conclusions. First, the theory may be relevant to several current areas of research, including (a) the nature and scope of the regular, “grammatical” side of language, (b) the organization of different domains of conceptual structure, including parallels across domains, their taxonomic distribution and implications for evolution, and (c) the influence of conceptual structure on social structure. Second, the theory compares favorably with alternatives, including (a) the theory that kin terminology is not really that complicated, (b) the theory that kin terms mirror social categories, (c) componential analysis, and (d) kinship algebra. If further research in anthropology, linguistics, and other fields supports the theory, and confirms the psychological reality of proposed mechanisms, then kinship may emerge as a model system for the study of important issues in cognition and social organization.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alvard M. (2003) Kinship, lineage identity, and an evolutionary perspective on the structure of cooperative big game hunting groups in Indonesia. Human Nature 14:129–63.
Bennardo G. & Read D. (2010) Salience of verticality and horizontality in American and Tongan kinship terminologies. In: Kinship, language, and prehistory: Per Hage and the renaissance in kinship studies, ed. Jones D. & Milicic B., pp. 173–91. University of Utah.
Brentari D. (1998) A prosodic model of sign language phonology. MIT Press.
Cheney D. L. & Seyfarth R. M. (2007) Baboon metaphysics: The evolution of a social mind. University of Chicago Press.
Coult A. (1966) A simplified method for the transformational analysis of kin terms. American Anthropologist 68:1476–83.
Godelier M. Trautmann T. R. & Tjon Sie Fat F. E., ed. (1998) Introduction. In: Transformations of kinship, pp. 126. Smithsonian.
Gould S. (2000) A new system for the formal analysis of kinship. University Press of America.
Héritier F. (2002) Two sisters and their mother: The anthropology of incest. Zone Books.
Jackendoff R. (2002) Foundations of language:Bbrain, meaning, grammar, and evolution. Oxford University Press.
Jones D. (2000) Group nepotism and human kinship. Current Anthropology 41:779809.
Jones D. (2003b) The generative psychology of kinship: Part II. Generating variation from universal building blocks with optimality theory. Evolution and Human Behavior 24:320–50.
Jones D. (2004) The universal psychology of kinship: Evidence from language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(5):211–15.
Jones D. (2010) Grammars of kinship and color: Cognitive universals and optimal communication. In: Kinship, language, and prehistory: Per Hage and the renaissance in kinship studies, ed. Jones D. & Milicic B., pp. 196211. University of Utah.
Kay P. (1975) The generative analysis of kinship semantics: A reanalysis of the Seneca data. Foundations of Language 13:201–14.
Legendre G., Sorace A. & Smolensky P. (2006) The optimality theory – harmonic grammar connection. In: The harmonic mind: From neural computation to optimality-theoretic grammar, vol. 2: Linguistic and philosophical implications, ed. Smolensky P. & Legendre G., pp. 339402. MIT Press.
Lounsbury F. (1965) Another view of Trobriand kinship categories. In: Formal semantic analysis, ed. Hammel E. A., pp. 142–86. American Anthropological Association.
Mikhail J. (2007) Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11:143–52.
Morgan L. H. (1997/1871) Systems of consanguinity and affinity of the human family. University of Nebraska Press.
Murdock G. P. (1949) Social structure. The Free Press.
Pinker S. (2007) The stuff of thought: Language as a window into human nature. Viking.
Read D. (2008) Working memory: A cognitive limit to non-human primate recursive thinking prior to hominid evolution. Evolutionary Psychology 6:676724.
Sperber D. (1996) Explaining culture: A naturalistic approach. Wiley-Blackwell.
Sperber D. & Hirschfeld L. (2004) The cognitive foundations of cultural stability and diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:4046.
Whiting J. W. M., Burton M. L., Romney A. K., Moore C. C. & White D. R. (1988) A reanalysis of Murdock's model for social structure based on optimal scaling. Behavior Science Research 22:2340.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 20 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 72 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.