Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 72
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Cowell, Jason M. Lee, Kang Malcolm-Smith, Susan Selcuk, Bilge Zhou, Xinyue and Decety, Jean 2016. The development of generosity and moral cognition across five cultures. Developmental Science,

    Dyble, Mark Thompson, James Smith, Daniel Salali, Gul Deniz Chaudhary, Nikhil Page, Abigail E. Vinicuis, Lucio Mace, Ruth and Migliano, Andrea Bamberg 2016. Networks of Food Sharing Reveal the Functional Significance of Multilevel Sociality in Two Hunter-Gatherer Groups. Current Biology,

    Fieder, Martin and Huber, Susanne 2016. The Adapting Mind in the Genomic Era. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7,

    Fieder, Martin and Huber, Susanne 2016. The association between religious homogamy and reproduction. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 283, Issue. 1834, p. 20160294.

    Gurven, Michael Jaeggi, Adrian V. White, Frances J. and Boose, Klaree J. 2016. Obstacles and catalysts of cooperation in humans, bonobos, and chimpanzees: behavioural reaction norms can help explain variation in sex roles, inequality, war and peace. Behaviour,

    Jaeggi, Adrian V. Hooper, Paul L. Beheim, Bret A. Kaplan, Hillard and Gurven, Michael 2016. Reciprocal Exchange Patterned by Market Forces Helps Explain Cooperation in a Small-Scale Society. Current Biology,

    Jensen, K. 2016.

    Katz, Keziah and Naug, Dhruba 2016. Dancers and followers in a honeybee colony differently prioritize individual and colony nutritional needs. Animal Behaviour, Vol. 119, p. 69.

    Paul, Catherine E. Rapaport, Lisa G. and Gerard, Patrick 2016. Hwæt!: adaptive benefits of public displays of generosity and bravery in Beowulf. Behaviour,

    Powers, Simon T. van Schaik, Carel P. and Lehmann, Laurent 2016. How institutions shaped the last major evolutionary transition to large-scale human societies. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 371, Issue. 1687, p. 20150098.

    Smith, Jennifer E. Gavrilets, Sergey Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff Hooper, Paul L. Mouden, Claire El Nettle, Daniel Hauert, Christoph Hill, Kim Perry, Susan Pusey, Anne E. van Vugt, Mark and Smith, Eric Alden 2016. Leadership in Mammalian Societies: Emergence, Distribution, Power, and Payoff. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, Vol. 31, Issue. 1, p. 54.

    Smith, Daniel Dyble, Mark Thompson, James Major, Katie Page, Abigail E. Chaudhary, Nikhil Salali, Gul Deniz Vinicius, Lucio Migliano, Andrea Bamberg and Mace, Ruth 2016. Camp stability predicts patterns of hunter–gatherer cooperation. Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 3, Issue. 7, p. 160131.

    Sznycer, Daniel Tooby, John Cosmides, Leda Porat, Roni Shalvi, Shaul and Halperin, Eran 2016. Shame closely tracks the threat of devaluation by others, even across cultures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 113, Issue. 10, p. 2625.

    Undurraga, Eduardo A. Nica, Veronica Zhang, Rebecca Mensah, Irene C. and Godoy, Ricardo A. 2016. Individual health and the visibility of village economic inequality: Longitudinal evidence from native Amazonians in Bolivia. Economics & Human Biology, Vol. 23, p. 18.

    Wright, Brianna M. Stredulinsky, Eva H. Ellis, Graeme M. and Ford, John K.B. 2016. Kin-directed food sharing promotes lifetime natal philopatry of both sexes in a population of fish-eating killer whales, Orcinus orca. Animal Behaviour, Vol. 115, p. 81.

    2016. The Primate Origins of Human Nature.

    Apicella, Coren L. and Crittenden, Alyssa N. 2015. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology.

    Cosmides, Leda and Tooby, John 2015. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology.

    Gurven, Michael and Jaeggi, Adrian V. 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    Hames, Raymond 2015. The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology.


To give and to give not: The behavioral ecology of human food transfers

  • Michael Gurven (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 August 2004

The transfer of food among group members is a ubiquitous feature of small-scale forager and forager-agricultural populations. The uniqueness of pervasive sharing among humans, especially among unrelated individuals, has led researchers to evaluate numerous hypotheses about the adaptive functions and patterns of sharing in different ecologies. This article attempts to organize available cross-cultural evidence pertaining to several contentious evolutionary models: kin selection, reciprocal altruism, tolerated scrounging, and costly signaling. Debates about the relevance of these models focus primarily on the extent to which individuals exert control over the distribution of foods they acquire, and the extent to which donors receive food or other fitness-enhancing benefits in return for shares given away. Each model can explain some of the variance in sharing patterns within groups, and so generalizations that ignore or deny the importance of any one model may be misleading. Careful multivariate analyses and cross-cultural comparisons of food transfer patterns are therefore necessary tools for assessing aspects of the sexual division of labor, human life history evolution, and the evolution of the family. This article also introduces a framework for better understanding variation in sharing behavior across small-scale traditional societies. I discuss the importance of resource ecology and the degree of coordination in acquisition activities as a key feature that influences sharing behavior.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *