Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 21
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Wang, Yanlu Msghina, Mussie and Li, Tie-Qiang 2016. Studying Sub-Dendrograms of Resting-State Functional Networks with Voxel-Wise Hierarchical Clustering. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 10,


    Palmisano, Stephen Allison, Robert S. Schira, Mark M. and Barry, Robert J. 2015. Future challenges for vection research: definitions, functional significance, measures, and neural bases. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6,


    Wiltshire, Travis J. Lobato, Emilio J. C. McConnell, Daniel S. and Fiore, Stephen M. 2015. Prospects for direct social perception: a multi-theoretical integration to further the science of social cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 8,


    Cohen, M. D. Levinthal, D. A. and Warglien, M. 2014. Collective performance: modeling the interaction of habit-based actions. Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 329.


    Kulasegaram, Kulamakan M Grierson, Lawrence E M and Norman, Geoffrey R 2013. The roles of deliberate practice and innate ability in developing expertise: evidence and implications. Medical Education, Vol. 47, Issue. 10, p. 979.


    Kubovy, Michael Epstein, William and Gepshtein, Sergei 2012. Handbook of Psychology, Second Edition.


    Avraamides, Marios N. and Kelly, Jonathan W. 2008. Multiple systems of spatial memory and action. Cognitive Processing, Vol. 9, Issue. 2, p. 93.


    Liu, Geniva Chua, Romeo and Enns, James T. 2008. Attention for perception and action: task interference for action planning, but not for online control. Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 185, Issue. 4, p. 709.


    Raftopoulos, Athanasios 2008. Perceptual systems and realism. Synthese, Vol. 164, Issue. 1, p. 61.


    Yoon, J. M. D. Johnson, M. H. and Csibra, G. 2008. Communication-induced memory biases in preverbal infants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 105, Issue. 36, p. 13690.


    Mounoud, Pierre Duscherer, Katia Moy, Guénaël and Perraudin, Sandrine 2007. The influence of action perception on object recognition: a developmental study. Developmental Science, Vol. 10, Issue. 6, p. 836.


    You, Junyong Liu, Guizhong Sun, Li and Li, Hongliang 2007. A Multiple Visual Models Based Perceptive Analysis Framework for Multilevel Video Summarization. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 17, Issue. 3, p. 273.


    Alley, Thomas R. and Passinos-Coffman, Theodora 2006. Are Judgments of Linear Size More Accurate When Based on an Affordance?. Ecological Psychology, Vol. 18, Issue. 4, p. 243.


    FUKUI, TAKAO TAKEMURA, NAOHIRO and INUI, TOSHIO 2006. Visuomotor transformation process in goal-directed prehension: Utilization of online vision during preshaping phase of grasping. Japanese Psychological Research, Vol. 48, Issue. 3, p. 188.


    HIGUCHI, TAKAHIRO IMANAKA, KUNIYASU and PATLA, AFTAB E. 2006. Action-oriented representation of peripersonal and extrapersonal space: Insights from manual and locomotor actions. Japanese Psychological Research, Vol. 48, Issue. 3, p. 126.


    Raftopoulos, Athanassios and Muller, Vincent C. 2006. The Phenomenal Content of Experience. Mind <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&amp;"/> Language, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 187.


    Schenk, Thomas 2006. An allocentric rather than perceptual deficit in patient D.F.. Nature Neuroscience, Vol. 9, Issue. 11, p. 1369.


    Warren, William H. 2006. The dynamics of perception and action.. Psychological Review, Vol. 113, Issue. 2, p. 358.


    Glazebrook, Cheryl M. Dhillon, Victoria P. Keetch, Katherine M. Lyons, James Amazeen, Eric Weeks, Daniel J. and Elliott, Digby 2005. Perception-action and the M�ller-Lyer illusion: amplitude or endpoint bias?. Experimental Brain Research, Vol. 160, Issue. 1, p. 71.


    Li, Muhua and Clark, James J. 2004. A Temporal Stability Approach to Position and Attention-Shift-Invariant Recognition. Neural Computation, Vol. 16, Issue. 11, p. 2293.


    ×

Two visual systems and two theories of perception: An attempt to reconcile the constructivist and ecological approaches

  • Joel Norman (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0200002X
  • Published online: 01 February 2002
Abstract

The two contrasting theoretical approaches to visual perception, the constructivist and the ecological, are briefly presented and illustrated through their analyses of space and size perception. Earlier calls for their reconciliation and unification are reviewed. Neurophysiological, neuropsychological, and psychophysical evidence for the existence of two quite distinct visual systems, the ventral and the dorsal, is presented. These two perceptual systems differ in their functions; the ventral system's central function is that of identification, while the dorsal system is mainly engaged in the visual control of motor behavior. The strong parallels between the ecological approach and the functioning of the dorsal system, and between the constructivist approach and the functioning of the ventral system are noted. It is also shown that the experimental paradigms used by the proponents of these two approaches match the functions of the respective visual systems. A dual-process approach to visual perception emerges from this analysis, with the ecological-dorsal process transpiring mainly without conscious awareness, while the constructivist-ventral process is normally conscious. Some implications of this dual-process approach to visual-perceptual phenomena are presented, with emphasis on space perception.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: