Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The underinformative formulation of conditional probability

  • Laura Macchi (a1) and Maria Bagassi (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The formulation of the conditional probability in classical tasks does not guarantee the effective transmission of the independence of the hit rate from the base rate. In these kinds of tasks, data are all available, but subjects are able to understand them in the specific meanings proper to a specialized language only if these are adequately transmitted. From this perspective, the partitive formulation should not be considered a facilitation, but rather, a way of effectively transmitting the conditional probability.

Consider the following two phrases: 1

The death-rate among men is twice that for women.

2

In the deaths registered last month there were twice as many men as women.

Are these two different ways of saying the same or are these different events? In fact, they are different events. (Lindley 1985, p. 44)

Copyright
References
Hide All
Birnbaum M. H. (1983) Base rates in Bayesian inference: Signal detection analysis of the cab problem. American Journal of Psychology 96:8594.
Dawes R. M. (1988) Rational choice in an uncertain world. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Girotto V. & Gonzalez M. (2001) Solving probabilistic and statistical problems: A matter of information structure and question form. Cognition 78:247–76.
Grice H. P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts, ed Cole P. & Morgan J. L..Academic Press.
Levinson S. C. (1995) Interactional biases in human thinking. In: Social intelligence and interaction, ed Goody E..Cambridge University Press.
Larkin J. H. & Simon H. A. (2000) Presumptive meanings. MIT Press.
Lindley D. V. (1985) Making decisions. Wiley.
Macchi L. (1995) Pragmatic aspects of the base rate fallacy. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 A(1):188207.
Macchi L. (2000) Partitive formulation of information in probabilistic problems: Beyond heuristics and frequency format explanations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82:217–36.
Macchi L. (2003) The partitive conditional probability. In: Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making, ed Hardman D. & Macchi L., pp. 165–87. Wiley.
Macchi L., Bagassi M. & Ciociola P. B. (2007) The pragmatic approach versus the dual-process theories on probabilistic reasoning. (Unpublished manuscript.)
Macchi L. & Mosconi G. (1998) Computational features vs frequentist phrasing in the base-rate fallacy. Swiss Journal of Psychology 57:7985.
Stanovich K. E. West R. F. (2000) Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23:645726.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 5 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 96 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.