Skip to main content

Universal Grammar: Hypothesis space or grammar selection procedures? Is UG affected by Critical Periods?

  • Gita Martohardjono (a1), Samuel David Epstein (a2) and Suzanne Flynn (a3)

Universal Grammar (UG) can be interpreted as a constraint on the form of possible grammars (hypothesis space) or as a constraint on acquisition strategies (selection procedures). In this response to Herschensohn we reiterate the position outlined in Epstein et al. (1996a, r), that in the evaluation of L2 acquisition as a UG- constrained process the former (possible grammars/ knowledge states) is critical, not the latter. Selection procedures, on the other hand, are important in that they may have a bearing on development in language acquisition. We raise the possibility that differences in first and second language acquisition pertaining to both attainment of the end-state and course of development may derive from differences in selection procedures. We further suggest that for these reasons age effects in the attainment of nativelike proficiency must necessarily be separated from UG effects.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • ISSN: 0140-525X
  • EISSN: 1469-1825
  • URL: /core/journals/behavioral-and-brain-sciences
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title

 PDF (57 KB)
57 KB


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 43 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 368 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.