Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-lm65w Total loading time: 0.006 Render date: 2025-07-27T19:52:53.704Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is the significance of The Origin of Concepts for philosophers' and psychologists' theories of concepts?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Edouard Machery
Edouard Machery
Affiliation:
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. machery@pitt.eduwww.pitt.edu/~machery/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Carey holds that the study of conceptual development bears on the theories of concepts developed by philosophers and psychologists. In this commentary, I scrutinize her claims about the significance of the study of conceptual development.

Information

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , June 2011 , pp. 137 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Carey, S. (2009) The origin of concepts. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. (2009) Doing without concepts. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E. (2010a) Précis of Doing without concepts . Behavioral & Brain Sciences 33(2–3):195–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machery, E. (2010b) Replies to Barbara Malt and Jesse Prinz. Mind & Language 25:633–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machery, E., Mallon, R., Nichols, S. & Stich, S. P. (2004) Semantics, cross-cultural style. Cognition 92:B1–B12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Machery, E., Olivola, C. Y. & de Blanc, M. (2009) Linguistic and metalinguistic intuitions in the philosophy of language. Analysis 69:689–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallon, R., Machery, E., Nichols, S. & Stich, S. P. (2009) Against arguments from reference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79:332–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, G. L. (2002) The big book of concepts. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRefGoogle Scholar