Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Boice, Robert
and
Jones, Ferdinand
1984.
Why Academicians Don't Write.
The Journal of Higher Education,
Vol. 55,
Issue. 5,
p.
567.
Boice, Robert
Pecker, Gayle
Zaback, Ellen
and
Barlow, David H.
1985.
A challenge to Peters and Ceci's conclusions with an examination of editorial files for reviewer appropriateness.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
744.
Berry, Russell L.
1985.
Administrative freedom versus academic freedom and peer reviews.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
743.
Cofer, Charles N.
1985.
Some reactions to manuscript review from a questionnaire study.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
745.
Peters, Douglas P.
and
Ceci, Stephen J.
1985.
Peer review: Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
747.
Sternberg, Robert J.
1985.
Tacit agreements between authors and editors.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
746.
Cohen, Patricia
1991.
Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
139.
Zentall, Thomas R.
1991.
What to do about peer review: Is the cure worse than the disease?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
166.
Eckberg, Douglas Lee
1991.
When nonreliability of reviews indicates solid science.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
145.
Adams, Kenneth M.
1991.
Peer review: An unflattering picture.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
135.
Cone, John D.
1991.
Evaluating scholarly works: How many reviewers? How much anonymity?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
142.
Cole, Stephen
1991.
Consensus and the reliability of peer-review evaluations.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
140.
Kraemer, Helena Chmura
1991.
Do we really want more “reliable” reviewers?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
152.
Marsh, Herbert W.
and
Ball, Samuel
1991.
Reflections on the peer review process.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
157.
Hargens, Lowell L.
1991.
Referee agreement in context.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
150.
Salzinger, Kurt
1991.
Now that we know how low the reliability is, what shall we do?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
162.
Cicchetti, Domenic V.
1991.
Reflections from the peer review mirror.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
167.
Tyrer, Peter
1991.
Chairman's action: The importance of executive decisions in peer review.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
164.
Cicchetti, Domenic V.
1991.
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
119.
Roediger, Henry L.
1991.
Is unreliability in peer review harmful?.
Behavioral and Brain Sciences,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 1,
p.
159.